- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Question: Would OU and UT still make a pee wee football league...
Posted on 6/14/10 at 2:55 pm
Posted on 6/14/10 at 2:55 pm
...without Texas A&M? Or will they go west if aTm comes to the SEC?
This post was edited on 6/14/10 at 2:56 pm
2
Posted on 6/14/10 at 2:57 pm to tuck
texas would probably prefer A&M left for the SEC - since they want the PAC and it would allow them to scapegoat A&M for the destruction of the Big 12
Posted on 6/14/10 at 2:59 pm to tuck
Without TAMU, that conference looks very pathetic.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 2:59 pm to molsusports
quote:So if this shitty league they are trying to come up with on short notice falls through, they are headed to the Pac?
texas would probably prefer A&M left for the SEC - since they want the PAC and it would allow them to scapegoat A&M for the destruction of the Big 12
The reason I ask is because I wonder if SEC schools would really want aTm if they knew that the Pac was basically going to stay the same and there would be this new shitty SWC and the Big 10 would have only 12 teams? There would be no need to take on someone new, would there?
This post was edited on 6/14/10 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 6/14/10 at 3:00 pm to tuck
I wouldn't mind adding TAMU regardless of the current situations.
Posted on 6/14/10 at 3:02 pm to tuck
Bingo.
Slive will not make the first move and allow A&M to come to the SEC without the destruction of the Big 12 occuring first. He won't be the catalyst for the destruction of the Big 12 and the creation of the PAC16. He will wait and watch.
If it's a shitty Big 12 conference that results, that's fine by us.
Slive will not make the first move and allow A&M to come to the SEC without the destruction of the Big 12 occuring first. He won't be the catalyst for the destruction of the Big 12 and the creation of the PAC16. He will wait and watch.
If it's a shitty Big 12 conference that results, that's fine by us.
This post was edited on 6/14/10 at 3:04 pm
Posted on 6/14/10 at 3:02 pm to tuck
quote:
I wonder if SEC schools would really want aTm if they knew that the Pac was basically going to stay the same
I think the thinking is A&M adds enough to the pie to make a lot of sense financially no matter what else changes
quote:
So if this shitty league they are trying to come up with on short notice falls through, they are headed to the Pac?
There's no reason to think teh PAC lost interest or that Texas lost their desire to move to the PAC
Posted on 6/14/10 at 3:10 pm to Duckie
I don't see where losing A&M has much of an impact on the PAC-10 deal. Everyone seemed perfectly happy discussing which team would replace A&M in the deal, Utah or Kansa. I think the only reason UT has started the save the Big-12 talk is because OU was going to go SEC rather than PAC-16. And that killed the PAC-16 deal.
Either way, I don't see this fairy tale working out. Snow White and the 7 dwarves are not going to create a conference with the evil queen and a bad apple.
Either way, I don't see this fairy tale working out. Snow White and the 7 dwarves are not going to create a conference with the evil queen and a bad apple.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News