- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

USC IN BCS ERA
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:12 pm
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:12 pm
USC has played in 2 national championship games and only won one. Against an Oklahoma team that should have been supplanted by undefeated Auburn. If Auburn makes it to that game USC is 0-2 in BCS title games.
The SEC is 4-0 in the title game while the PAC 10 is 1-1(with USC the only PAC 10 team to play)
Soon the SEC will be 5-0 in the national title game with 2 teams having won it twice. LSU-Florida who happen to play each other every year.
USC is a joke.
The SEC is 4-0 in the title game while the PAC 10 is 1-1(with USC the only PAC 10 team to play)
Soon the SEC will be 5-0 in the national title game with 2 teams having won it twice. LSU-Florida who happen to play each other every year.
USC is a joke.
This post was edited on 1/2/09 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:13 pm to Checkmateking2
quote:
If Auburn makes it to that game USC is 0-2 in BCS title games.
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:14 pm to Checkmateking2
quote:
If Auburn makes it to that game USC is 0-2 in BCS title games.
No way.
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:14 pm to Checkmateking2
quote:
If Auburn makes it to that game USC is 0-2 in BCS title games.
nah I think SC would have won, they were the best team that year, but it wouldn't have been the Stoopsian blowout that it was.
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:14 pm to Checkmateking2
ur dum.
USC would have beaten the crap out of Auburn.
USC would have beaten the crap out of Auburn.
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:14 pm to Checkmateking2
USC would have stomped Auburn.
ETA: Auburn wasn't in because of SOS, so Oklahoma was rightfully there.
ETA: Auburn wasn't in because of SOS, so Oklahoma was rightfully there.
This post was edited on 1/2/09 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:14 pm to Checkmateking2
Your envy or resentful obsession of USC only perpetuates the very problem you complain about...that USC gets too much hype.
USC is a really, really good team. There's no need to cry because ESPN gives them a lot of attention.
USC is a really, really good team. There's no need to cry because ESPN gives them a lot of attention.
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:14 pm to Checkmateking2
I'm trying to figure out who is more obsessed with USC....ESPN or the MSB.
It's neck and neck so far.
It's neck and neck so far.
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:16 pm to Checkmateking2
quote:
Against an Oklahoma team that should have been supplanted by undefeated Auburn.
What did Auburn do in the regular season that was more impressive than Oklahoma? OU had the same record and a tougher schedule by most measures.
And what evidence do you have to suggest AU would win?
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:16 pm to MStreetTiger
ESPN needs something to talk about since they don't want to pimp Fox's Bowl games THAT much.
Hence, why they talk all about USC.
Hence, why they talk all about USC.
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:16 pm to Checkmateking2
quote:
Against an Oklahoma team that should have been supplanted by undefeated Auburn. If Auburn makes it to that game USC is 0-2 in BCS title games.
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:17 pm to KosmoCramer
2004 Auburn team was the best team of the SEC of the decade
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:17 pm to lsumatt
quote:
What did Auburn do in the regular season that was more impressive than Oklahoma?
They beat the defending national champs that had held Oklahoma in January of 2004 to under 200 yards offense.
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:18 pm to Checkmateking2
quote:
If Auburn makes it to that game USC is 0-2 in BCS title games.
quote:
USC is a joke
7 straight BCS games is NOT a joke!!!!
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:19 pm to KosmoCramer
It's not the attention that bothers me. Its the persistent "BEST EVER" and "DYNASTY" comments that set me off. Oklahoma is more deserving of that kind of talk IMO.
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 AVE
Oklahoma 13 11 12 12 12 8 11 11 12 11.33
Texas 9 11 11 10 11 13 10 10 11 10.67
USC 5 6 11 12 13 12 11 11 12 10.33
Ohio ST 8 7 14 11 8 10 12 11 10 10.11
LSU 8 10 8 13 9 11 11 12 8 10.00
Florida 10 10 8 8 7 9 13 9 12 9.56
Miami 11 12 12 11 9 9 7 5 7 9.22
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 AVE
Oklahoma 13 11 12 12 12 8 11 11 12 11.33
Texas 9 11 11 10 11 13 10 10 11 10.67
USC 5 6 11 12 13 12 11 11 12 10.33
Ohio ST 8 7 14 11 8 10 12 11 10 10.11
LSU 8 10 8 13 9 11 11 12 8 10.00
Florida 10 10 8 8 7 9 13 9 12 9.56
Miami 11 12 12 11 9 9 7 5 7 9.22
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:19 pm to los angeles tiger
quote:
They beat the defending national champs that had held Oklahoma in January of 2004 to under 200 yards offense.
Who gives a shite. Arkansas beat the defending National Champs this year too. That was a different team in 2004
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:19 pm to dukke v
How can you not nake it to a BCS game when you play absolutely no one? They should play in the BCS title game every year. Oh yeah they can't because they get beat by 41 point underdogs at home.
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:20 pm to SoCalCajun
If all you have to do is win the PAC 10 to make it to the BCS, it kind of makes it not that great of an accomplishment.
Posted on 1/2/09 at 2:21 pm to Checkmateking2
USC and the Wac-10 are a joke.
Popular
Back to top

13




