- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Your opinion. One question
Posted on 11/15/09 at 11:38 am
Posted on 11/15/09 at 11:38 am
I have one question. This is more less a poll question therefore a one word answer will suffice. Who do you think is a better OC our of FISHER or CROWTON
This post was edited on 11/15/09 at 11:39 am
Posted on 11/15/09 at 11:41 am to eddieray
Fisher develops quarterbacks better...that's for sure. Both have their downs. AT the end of the day, I will take Jimbo.
Posted on 11/15/09 at 11:43 am to eddieray
I hated Fisher and at first I really liked crowton. Crowton > Fisher!
I just don't understand why we don't run more misdirections and stuff like that that keeps the defense guessing. How often have you lost track of the ball when watching teams do those type of plays.
Fisher I think was alergic to that sort of thing. Crowton seems to be coming down with the same thing although we do it occasionally.
I just don't understand why we don't run more misdirections and stuff like that that keeps the defense guessing. How often have you lost track of the ball when watching teams do those type of plays.
Fisher I think was alergic to that sort of thing. Crowton seems to be coming down with the same thing although we do it occasionally.
Posted on 11/15/09 at 11:45 am to PiscesTiger
Jimbo. He wasn't the most exciting or inovative play caller, but did a good job of developing the QB and we could consistantly move the ball.
Popular
Back to top
2






