Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Stephen Rivers...why no love? | Tiger Rant
Started By
Message
locked post

Stephen Rivers...why no love?

Posted on 8/2/12 at 11:28 pm
Posted by TXGunslinger10
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2011
18137 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 11:28 pm
After Mett, it seems like everyone just wants to skip over Rivers and move right on to Bolden/Randall. Miles always mentions Rivers when talking about backups.

I'm just wondering why the majority of the Rant doesn't feel like he's a viable backup...OTHER than the no experience factor.
Posted by Outlaw
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
3365 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 11:30 pm to
That you Stephen?
Posted by Tiger Authority
Member since Jul 2007
29476 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 11:31 pm to
quote:

After Mett, it seems like everyone just wants to skip over Rivers and move right on to Bolden/Randall.


I don't get this impression at all.
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 11:31 pm to
quote:

I'm just wondering why the majority of the Rant doesn't feel like he's a viable backup...


the rant is largely made up of idiots...pay no attention to them
Posted by Dodd
Member since Oct 2003
21121 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 11:32 pm to
because the majority of the rant, including myself, aint gotta clue about anything
Posted by TXGunslinger10
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2011
18137 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 11:33 pm to
Glad to hear that boys. I was a fan of us signing this guy and I think if he got a little experience and put on some weight, he could really set himself up well to be a 2 (possibly 3) year starter
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
65454 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 11:35 pm to
quote:

...OTHER than the no experience factor.


This, I think everyone thinks Miles will not won't to throw him in the gauntlet too soon, so the buzz is a little tampered based on the past. Bringing Bolden in just reaffirms this IMO. If Bolden wasn't here, I think you'd see more interest in his development, but right now, its a wait and see....
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
83697 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 11:36 pm to
Bc no one knows much about him?
Posted by TXGunslinger10
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2011
18137 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 11:38 pm to
The way I look at it, all 3 backups are inexperienced. Bolden is learning a completely new system. Not to mention I'm sure Krags is going to try and work out some of his issues that he had in Happy Valley, so he's going to have to backtrack a little in order to move forward
Posted by TXGunslinger10
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2011
18137 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 11:40 pm to
I'm just saying that where Rivers is now, barring any emergency situation, his development is right on course
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
79436 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 11:40 pm to
quote:

it seems like everyone just wants to skip over Rivers and move right on to Bolden/Randall.

Are you sure you read this board?
Posted by TXGunslinger10
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2011
18137 posts
Posted on 8/2/12 at 11:43 pm to
More than I probably should. Just trying to defy the atmosphere and have an intelligent convo regarding our most ready backup
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 8/3/12 at 12:27 am to
To me, it seems there's a reason we went after Bolden. That reason being the coaches not thinking Rivers is ready
Posted by bojabu
Member since Sep 2010
1275 posts
Posted on 8/3/12 at 12:35 am to
I think he's going to be one heck of a good Qb. He looked good, but inconsistant in the spring game, against the best secondary in the nation no less, with the second team offense.
Posted by Summer of George
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
6068 posts
Posted on 8/3/12 at 1:20 am to
quote:

To me, it seems there's a reason we went after Bolden. That reason being the coaches not thinking Rivers is ready


What about liggins not making it to campus and Les's preference for having 5 QBs on the roster? Let's just put it this way. If liggins was on campus bolden would not be. Bolden being here is not an indictment of rivers's ability.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
26664 posts
Posted on 8/3/12 at 3:02 am to
I agree that most here seem to be harsh on Rivers. It all boils down to the situation. Mett could go pro so regardless of whether he does or not is not relevant.... you must prepare for him going pro.

So Miles is not over confident in BOTH Rivers and Randall. Unless he is super confident in BOTH he will need a back up for... lets say Rivers next year. Without Bolden we don't have one.

It will be interesting to see if Bolden is redshirted or not! I am guessing he will be if everything goes as planned.
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 8/3/12 at 3:47 am to
he doesn't deserve it.
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
26377 posts
Posted on 8/3/12 at 5:49 am to
I think Stephen is coming along just great.
Posted by DEG
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2009
10772 posts
Posted on 8/3/12 at 6:58 am to
quote:

I think Stephen is coming along just great.


How could you possibly know this unless you're on the staff?

Miles is NEVER going to let another season come down to a freshman under center - even if it's a redshirt freshman. Our program should have enough depth to be able to run a Junior out there, even as a #2.

The man will not be doomed to repeat history.
Posted by HeadCoach
Shady's Parking Lot
Member since Mar 2009
5659 posts
Posted on 8/3/12 at 7:40 am to
:Miles hates white QB's meme:
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram