- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Anyone concerned on the lack of sacks
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:24 pm
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:24 pm
Anyone concerned with the lack of sacks thru 3 lesser opponents. We have got to get more pressure on opposing QB's
11
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:24 pm to longboy
Mingo and Sam etc will shine in SEC play.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:25 pm to longboy
Considering the quick throw offenses...no. I'll take the domination over a sack any day.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:26 pm to longboy
Sacks are a pretty overrated stat, imo
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:26 pm to graychef
We need gonna our studs to step up against bama though.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:31 pm to CP3LSU25
I will worry about sacks never. I worry more about pressures. We have been getting qb pressure all season. You are not going to sack a qb when they are running plays to prevent a sack from happening!
Idaho ran a quick hit passing game just like WV and Oregon did against us last year. We won those despite giving up a lot of yards. Well facing the same kind of offensive philosophy so far our D hasn't given up much yardage at all.
Idaho ran a quick hit passing game just like WV and Oregon did against us last year. We won those despite giving up a lot of yards. Well facing the same kind of offensive philosophy so far our D hasn't given up much yardage at all.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:32 pm to CP3LSU25
Max Protect and 3 step drops aren't a stategy for winning, they are a strategy for not getting your QB killed.
Once a team actually tries to win against us, the sacks will come.
Once a team actually tries to win against us, the sacks will come.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:32 pm to graychef
quote:
Considering the quick throw offenses...no. I'll take the domination over a sack any day.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:34 pm to longboy
three step drop qb's. If we had the steel curtain in their hay day we couldn't get to the qb with that offense. The thinking is if we force them to be one dimensional and throw the ball, we will force turnovers and give the short field to our offense or score. Happens to the best of them. See Manning and Brees this weekend and last night.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:34 pm to longboy
quote:
Anyone concerned with the lack of sacks thru 3 lesser opponents. We have got to get more pressure on opposing QB's
NT and Idaho was throwing quick throws to avoid the pass rush. Not going to get sacks against that but we still shut them down. We had sacks against Udub and Price was running for his life all night.
To sum up, no I'm not concerned.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:35 pm to longboy
quote:
Anyone concerned on the lack of sacks
Not in the least.
quote:
We have got to get more pressure on opposing QB's
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:37 pm to PurpleAndGold86
To sum up everyones answer NO
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:40 pm to longboy
quote:
Anyone concerned with the lack of sacks thru 3 lesser opponents. We have got to get more pressure on opposing QB's
No, and if you watched all three games, you'd know that we regularly get pressure on the QBs.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:42 pm to longboy
I would like to see Mingo and co. Plant a few SEC QB's in the dirt. But, I would rather see us pressure the QB into making crap decisions.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:42 pm to omegaman66
quote:
I will worry about sacks never. I worry more about pressures. We have been getting qb pressure all season. You are not going to sack a qb when they are running plays to prevent a sack from happening!
Exactly. I can think of two situations where LSU players aborted their pass rush because they recognized a quick pass and made interceptions instead. One by Reid and one by LE.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:43 pm to longboy
quote:
We have got to get more pressure on opposing QB's
Did you watch any of the three games, or did you just stick your finger up your arse and sniff it for three hours at a time?
worst first post ever.
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:44 pm to Harry Caray
Also, is this thread topic the new JJ thread? I've only seen 65,000 of them started, most by new members. What is going on in here?
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:51 pm to therick711
This thread has some real football knowledge in it 
Posted on 9/18/12 at 5:54 pm to AtlantaLSUfan
I try 
Eric Reid's play was remarkable. He was in a delay blitz that gave him a open lane to the passer, but in a split second (because he is a terrific player who doesn't drop his head and charge blindly) diagnosed what was happening and simply stopped and waited. Then jumped and made a pretty tough play look remarkably simple.
Long story short, if you realize the play is a blitz beater and you can get in position to turn disadvantage in to catastrophic, demoralizing, soul crushing advantage, that is more impressive than 6 sacks.
Eric Reid's play was remarkable. He was in a delay blitz that gave him a open lane to the passer, but in a split second (because he is a terrific player who doesn't drop his head and charge blindly) diagnosed what was happening and simply stopped and waited. Then jumped and made a pretty tough play look remarkably simple.
Long story short, if you realize the play is a blitz beater and you can get in position to turn disadvantage in to catastrophic, demoralizing, soul crushing advantage, that is more impressive than 6 sacks.
This post was edited on 9/18/12 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 9/18/12 at 6:29 pm to longboy
quote:
Anyone concerned on the lack of sacks
ME!
I would much rather be 0-3 but have an asston of sacks
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News