Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Metacritic vs. Rotten Tomatoes...which do you prefer? | Movie/TV Board
Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Metacritic vs. Rotten Tomatoes...which do you prefer?

Posted on 5/30/13 at 2:29 pm
Posted by betweenthebara
nowhere
Member since May 2013
6183 posts
Posted on 5/30/13 at 2:29 pm
Quick poll. I prefer metacritic.
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
58722 posts
Posted on 5/30/13 at 2:32 pm to
movies: tomatoes

everything else: metacritic
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 5/30/13 at 2:39 pm to
Rotten Tomatoes audience.
Posted by taylork37
Member since Mar 2010
15698 posts
Posted on 5/30/13 at 2:51 pm to
It is not one of the two answers, but I trust IMDB.
Anything above a 7 is worth a watch. Anything from 6-7 is a maybe watch if you have no other movies and anything below a 6 is not worth watching.
Posted by Minimus
Member since Jan 2013
160 posts
Posted on 5/30/13 at 3:02 pm to
Rotten Tomatoes for movies
IMDB for tv shows(and movies)
Metacritic for video games
Posted by LOCO5150
NWA
Member since Sep 2011
4867 posts
Posted on 5/30/13 at 3:39 pm to
I think there should be website that has professional and user reviews that rank the movie review websites.
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 5/30/13 at 3:42 pm to
Rottentomatoes is better, but only if you ignore the tomato meter. I really don't care if 90% of critics thought a movie was just slightly better than average. I'd rather quickly see that they all rate it 6/10 than a 90
Posted by LE610N
Red Stick
Member since Feb 2013
1199 posts
Posted on 5/30/13 at 4:30 pm to
Rotten Tomatoes. From What I remember metacritic tries to interpret scores from reviews that don't have a numerical value.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram