- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why can't there be single digital, secure voting machines
Posted on 11/8/16 at 5:57 pm
Posted on 11/8/16 at 5:57 pm
Throughout the country? It's 2016.
You mean to tell me that American Idol has a better way to count votes than for the office of the most powerful person in the country?
You mean to tell me that American Idol has a better way to count votes than for the office of the most powerful person in the country?
7
Posted on 11/8/16 at 5:58 pm to Prominentwon
Because the bid for production of these machines would be awarded to the highest Clinton Foundation donor
This post was edited on 11/8/16 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 11/8/16 at 5:59 pm to Prominentwon
Posted on 11/8/16 at 5:59 pm to Prominentwon
as much as multiple methods of voting sucks, imagine the power the one agency controlling the voting would have.
Then imagine if someone like Lynch or Comey was in charge of it
Then imagine if someone like Lynch or Comey was in charge of it
Posted on 11/8/16 at 5:59 pm to Kankles
George Soros already makes them
Posted on 11/8/16 at 6:00 pm to Prominentwon
quote:nothing thats digital is secure. nothing.
digital, secure voting machines
Posted on 11/8/16 at 6:02 pm to Prominentwon
The technology is there.
We could do encrypted computerized voting with fingerprint ID that would be nearly tamper-proof.
I say nearly tamper-proof because there's no telling what Soros and the dummocrats would cook up.
We could do encrypted computerized voting with fingerprint ID that would be nearly tamper-proof.
I say nearly tamper-proof because there's no telling what Soros and the dummocrats would cook up.
Posted on 11/8/16 at 6:03 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
digital, secure
Oxymoron
Posted on 11/8/16 at 6:19 pm to CtotheVrzrbck
Even if you could do that, the data still has to go somewhere. Who would own those servers? Who would own the data lines sending the info?
What encryption would you use? Would it be so secure as to be "unhackable"? What if there is a recount? How do we determine what the actual data was supposed to be if we can never decrypt it? If we can decrypt it, then someone else can too. If that's the case, then anyone worldwide could throw off any election they chose to (I don't literally means anyone, but you get the drift).
No technology is fool proof and for something this critical on this grand of a scale, we are still a bit aways from a completely safe and untamperable system.
What encryption would you use? Would it be so secure as to be "unhackable"? What if there is a recount? How do we determine what the actual data was supposed to be if we can never decrypt it? If we can decrypt it, then someone else can too. If that's the case, then anyone worldwide could throw off any election they chose to (I don't literally means anyone, but you get the drift).
No technology is fool proof and for something this critical on this grand of a scale, we are still a bit aways from a completely safe and untamperable system.
Posted on 11/8/16 at 6:21 pm to Prominentwon
Mine was scantron
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News