Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Saquon Barkley trade | Fantasy Sports
Started By
Message
locked post

Saquon Barkley trade

Posted on 10/17/18 at 6:25 pm
Posted by hollywoodhead
Member since Aug 2017
870 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 6:25 pm
10 team Standard. Currently 3-3, 6th in Pts

Sent: Barkley & Josh Gordon
Received: D. Johnson, T. Coleman, K. Allen

My team:

QB - Brees, Mayfield
RB - DJ, Coleman, McCoy, Powell, Ito, Henry
WR - M. Thomas, K. Allen, S. Diggs, Lockett, Nelson
TE - Ebron, Burton
D - Broncos
K - Tucker


Thoughts?
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
105949 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 6:29 pm to
Personally, I would have kept Saquon and Gordon.
Posted by gatordmb89
Member since Dec 2009
30814 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 6:42 pm to
Would rather have Barkley and Gordon.
Posted by Nonetheless
MAGA
Member since Jan 2012
34393 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 6:44 pm to
No
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
58751 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 6:50 pm to
why get rid of Saquon?
Posted by TigerMan327
Elsewhere
Member since Feb 2011
6113 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 7:04 pm to
You lost by a lot
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34922 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 7:56 pm to
Yea man, I don’t think this was a good trade for you at all
Posted by Jizzamo311
Member since Dec 2008
6484 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 9:01 pm to
You should have asked the board before accepting.

Have you not been watching Barkley? That offense is atrocious but it literally runs through him and he’s a freak of nature. He is pretty untouchable as far as I’m concerned
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
17009 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 9:31 pm to
Sorry but Barkley is just not tradable at this point unless they give up the house. He is a league winner IMO.

I don't think your starting lineup got an upgrade at all.
Posted by JinFL
Duuuval
Member since Oct 2004
4403 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 11:27 pm to
Awful trade, the other guy won.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59879 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 11:34 pm to
The only time you should trade where you get more guys than you give is when you are in big trouble. Should be a desperation move. 2-4 or worse at this part of the season. You should always be trying to trade two of yours for one to upgrade that optimal staring lineup. 3-3 is not the time for it imo.
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
58751 posts
Posted on 10/17/18 at 11:40 pm to
quote:

The only time you should trade where you get more guys than you give is when you are in big trouble. Should be a desperation move. 2-4 or worse at this part of the season. You should always be trying to trade two of yours for one to upgrade that optimal staring lineup. 3-3 is not the time for it imo.



This
Posted by SetTheMood
The Red Stick
Member since Jul 2012
3182 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 11:45 am to
You gave up the best player in the trade for three (3) under-performing players. If DJ and Allen begin to play like their draft positions, you'll be OK. But there's been no indication that it's coming...
Posted by Tigereye10005
New York, NY
Member since Sep 2016
1592 posts
Posted on 10/18/18 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

The only time you should trade where you get more guys than you give is when you are in big trouble. Should be a desperation move. 2-4 or worse at this part of the season. You should always be trying to trade two of yours for one to upgrade that optimal staring lineup. 3-3 is not the time for it imo.

Yea I agree. If you were 1-5 or 2-4 and floundering, maybe this is worth the risk, but at 3-3 you're still completely in the mix, not worth giving up that value. But hey, hope it works out for you.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram