- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 1/7/16 at 9:52 am to Nonetheless
Posted on 1/7/16 at 9:52 am to Nonetheless
quote:
This is not collusion.
Yes, it almost certainly is. The chances that an unfathomably bad trade happens to go from the team with worst record to a division leader is ridiculous low. Probably not a coincidence.
quote:
Last year i traded away russell westbrook for dirk and jrue. That wasnt vetoed. This shouldn't be vetoed either
You being an idiot has no bearing on whether a trade should be vetoed. Maybe that one shouldn't depending on when it happened, which owner's it was between, etc. This one is a no brainer. It's a non-fluky 29 point guy for 2 17 point guys who have overachieved and are around their ceiling. He could pick up Alonzo Gee and start him every game next to Durant and will have a higher point expectation than CJ and Barton. Picking up the best available free agent will have a 6 point higher expected value from the team getting Durant and 6 points lower for the team giving him up. So the equivalent of trading Curry for Gasol.
How about instead of pointing out that you either cheated, or were stupid last year, you explain how the team giving up Durant could possibly be benefitting outside of a kickback from the team he spread his legs to....
0
Posted on 1/7/16 at 9:53 am to Fearthehat0307
I vote to veto
Posted on 1/7/16 at 9:59 am to Fearthehat0307
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/7/16 at 10:10 am
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:01 am to BugaJesus
Y'all veto then. No sweat off my back. I expect offers if y'all do though
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:02 am to LosLobos111
quote:
I vote to veto
So do I
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:05 am to Fearthehat0307
quote:
Could they regress? Sure but I'm not winning anything and it's worth the gamble giving lack of other options
Is this a keeper league or no?
Also you could do a lot better than that offer, and I love CJ.
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:07 am to PortCityTiger24
No keeper league
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:07 am to BugaJesus
HIT EM WIT THAT VETO, Oooooooo!
This post was edited on 1/7/16 at 10:15 am
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:14 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:if you look at their point totals over the amount of games that ESPN shows records for, both of these guys are putting up near Durant levels of scoring. They can absolutely regress but Barton is top 5 at his position this year so far and cj top 10. And as far as better offers I wasn't getting any
Is this a keeper league or no?
Also you could do a lot better than that offer, and I love CJ.
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:15 am to Fearthehat0307
Also the dual position status of both of them at shallow positions adds more value also
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:17 am to BugaJesus
quote:alright. Now by the time I get off of work my inbox better be flooded with better offers
HIT EM WIT THAT VETO, Oooooooo!
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:17 am to Fearthehat0307
Top 5 according to what? Are you trying to tell me there aren't more than 4 guys that are averaging more than 17 fantasy points per game at the 2 spot?
Because I don't buy it.
Durant + waiver scrub is already better than CJ + Barton bro. Already. Then you factor in the fact that CJ and Barton are both already putting up career best numbers. They may stay the same, but they won't be better the next 2/3 of the season. If anything, they will regress.
Only way you could win this trade is if Durant got hurt tomorrow.
Because I don't buy it.
Durant + waiver scrub is already better than CJ + Barton bro. Already. Then you factor in the fact that CJ and Barton are both already putting up career best numbers. They may stay the same, but they won't be better the next 2/3 of the season. If anything, they will regress.
Only way you could win this trade is if Durant got hurt tomorrow.
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:19 am to BugaJesus
quote:according to ESPN as of yesterday morning he was number 4 in total scoring at his position. It says it on the box when you click their name
Top 5 according to what? Are you trying to tell me there aren't more than 4 guys that are averaging more than 17 fantasy points per game at the 2 spot?
Because I don't buy it.
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:22 am to Fearthehat0307
Looks like 15 to me
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:35 am to BugaJesus
Fear what's your email boss?
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:36 am to BugaJesus
Still showing ranking as 4 on his box. Maybe he is the number 4 sg/sf points guy. Can't really look at it that good. At work on my phone right now
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:36 am to BugaJesus
quote:you can email me through the league site
Fear what's your email boss?
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:43 am to Fearthehat0307
Just an FYI. I will reject all trades involving bigs unless y'all want to make it a Kevin Durant plus one of my bigs for a lot of pieces. I will require at minimum a sg and a sf. Not just one that can play both
Posted on 1/7/16 at 10:57 am to Fearthehat0307
Just noticed this part.
You've got mail.
You've got mail.
Posted on 1/7/16 at 12:07 pm to BugaJesus
You scream collusion from the rooftops then offer a worse trade lol
Page 62 of 114
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News