Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Chick fil a vs Canes | Page 4 | Food and Drink
Started By
Message

re: Chick fil a vs Canes

Posted on 7/13/25 at 6:58 pm to
Posted by Tigers0891
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2017
7117 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 6:58 pm to
Chik fil a is starting to catch up to Canes. It’s just that it’s because they are regressing.
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
20530 posts
Posted on 7/13/25 at 11:47 pm to
quote:

I also don't understand the Canes hate. It's tasty for fast food.


Nor do I. Had Canes for lunch today after church and it was great.

I'll concede, if Canes didn't have their sauce I wouldn't go there. But they do. And it compliments their chicken really well. I find it strange that so many posters apparently struggle connecting the chicken tender with the sauce.

I mean, do diners really eat their tenders sans sauce? Popeyes spicy doesn't need sauce. The seasoning is on the inside. Canes does. But voila, it works!
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88773 posts
Posted on 7/14/25 at 7:20 am to
quote:

I mean, do diners really eat their tenders sans sauce


I don't care for Cane's sauce and still enjoy eating their food occasionally. It's just trendy on here to hate Cane's
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
86790 posts
Posted on 7/14/25 at 10:29 am to
Canes is super successful despite being only marginally different than 10 different chains identical to it, so it's fair to say most people don't hate it.

As an aside, do they have Super Chix in LA?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram