- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Potentially bad news about Lache
Posted on 6/23/09 at 11:51 pm to STLSU
Posted on 6/23/09 at 11:51 pm to STLSU
quote:
you're a maroon
($1 to SonnyG)
And just like Sonny G, you didnt answer the question.
Let's try again, if you were in her situation, would you have said 'yes, Lache has committed to Auburn?'
Simple yes or no answer will be suffice
Posted on 6/23/09 at 11:55 pm to CFBFAN1121
quote:
And just like Sonny G, you didnt answer the question.
Let's try again, if you were in her situation, would you have said 'yes, Lache has committed to Auburn?'
Simple yes or no answer will be suffice
once again you have displayed your lack of reading comprehension skills.
she unequivocally said no, just as sabahr did. are you saying those two situations are similar, or that no really doesn't mean no?
go back and figure out what you are trying to say and then get back to me.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 11:59 pm to STLSU
quote:
once again you have displayed your lack of reading comprehension skills
No one's reading skills has anything to do with this. I know what she said. But for the second time u didnt answeer my question. Let's try one more time and if u dont answer the question, I'll know the answer
put yourself in her shoes, are you going to say 'yes, lache has committed silently to Auburn"
yes or no dude.
Posted on 6/24/09 at 12:02 am to CFBFAN1121
once again you display that you can not read.
she said NO, he has not (in response to saying whether he has silently committed).
you stated that she ended her sentence with "not an unequivocal no." that is a lie or a fool who can not read.
if she wanted to not be unequivocal, she would not have categorically said no.
how many times do i need to reply to you before you get it???
she said NO, he has not (in response to saying whether he has silently committed).
you stated that she ended her sentence with "not an unequivocal no." that is a lie or a fool who can not read.
if she wanted to not be unequivocal, she would not have categorically said no.
how many times do i need to reply to you before you get it???
Posted on 6/24/09 at 12:10 am to STLSU
quote:
you stated that she ended her sentence with "not an unequivocal no." that is a lie or a fool who can not read.
No, i said she ended her sentence with a lot of dots be behind it , like this..........,
that usually means there's more to be said.
This is 'unequivocal "NO, HE HAS NOT!!!!!!
This is not unequivocal "No, he has not..........
But that's not even the point, the point is , she'd never admit if he was an early commit to Auburn because she's not supposed to. Would you tell the board if you were in her shoes? yes or no
Posted on 6/24/09 at 12:17 am to CFBFAN1121
I've already answered your question but you're just fishing for a fight and reframing your position. 
This post was edited on 6/24/09 at 12:22 am
Posted on 6/24/09 at 12:25 am to CFBFAN1121
Too late to try to edit it
Posted on 6/24/09 at 12:26 am to CFBFAN1121
This is some dumb shite yall are spewing
Posted on 6/24/09 at 12:27 am to CFBFAN1121
Anyway, I got your intent despite what was your exact wording. Whether you want to recognize what you are saying or not is your own problem. You are impugning the Seastrunk family and her direct words. Hope you feel proud of yourself, you are an internet warrior without a conscience.
Posted on 6/24/09 at 12:31 am to Bum
quote:
Potentially bad news about Lache
This is some dumb shite yall are spewing
If you are fine with running off a recruit's relative, then I guess it is dumb for me to respond. I on the other hand would like to make a difference and call out those who want to throw flames, dumb or not.
Posted on 6/24/09 at 12:33 am to STLSU
And the argument of the grammar falls in there where?
This post was edited on 6/24/09 at 12:35 am
Posted on 6/24/09 at 12:34 am to Bum
nothing really. just what has been posted in this thread.
Posted on 6/24/09 at 8:49 am to CFBFAN1121
I get crap started everywhere I go!
Let me rephrase:
No, Lache has not made a silent commit to anyone nor does he know where he wants to go yet.
Let me rephrase:
No, Lache has not made a silent commit to anyone nor does he know where he wants to go yet.
Posted on 6/24/09 at 9:14 am to Jen Seastrunk
Gotta be careful around here Jen. Apparently you aren't allowed to use dots.
Posted on 6/24/09 at 9:38 am to STLSU
Dude you just got owned and can't even answer a simple question. Pitiful.
Posted on 6/24/09 at 10:19 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
Potentially bad news about Lache
Dude you just got owned and can't even answer a simple question. Pitiful.
She answered the question. I doubt many people agree with you, by the way.
Posted on 6/24/09 at 10:26 am to STLSU
To answer the question AGAIN, she made an unequivocal denial. I would never do that and be a liar.
Posted on 6/24/09 at 7:26 pm to CFBFAN1121
First, you're an idiot grasping for straws, trying to start an argument.
Second, I'm not going to answer a stupid question like yours.
Third, you have been OWNED more times in this one thread I can count!
Lastly, Jen's answer was unequivocal for everyone to see TWICE!
P.S. Jen and Lach are good people and not the kind of lying trash that you are!
STLSU...thanks for covering my back.
CFBFAN1121...question for you, "How do you keep a moron in suspense?"
Second, I'm not going to answer a stupid question like yours.
Third, you have been OWNED more times in this one thread I can count!
Lastly, Jen's answer was unequivocal for everyone to see TWICE!
P.S. Jen and Lach are good people and not the kind of lying trash that you are!
STLSU...thanks for covering my back.
CFBFAN1121...question for you, "How do you keep a moron in suspense?"
This post was edited on 6/24/09 at 7:33 pm
Posted on 6/24/09 at 9:22 pm to Sonny G
quote:
Potentially bad news about Lache
First, you're an idiot grasping for straws, trying to start an argument.
Second, I'm not going to answer a stupid question like yours.
Third, you have been OWNED more times in this one thread I can count!
Lastly, Jen's answer was unequivocal for everyone to see TWICE!
P.S. Jen and Lach are good people and not the kind of lying trash that you are!
STLSU...thanks for covering my back.
CFBFAN1121...question for you, "How do you keep a moron in suspense?"
no problem man. I just don't get why those guys were saying she was lying.
What I would do is totally irrelevant....but had I denied CFB's questions, I would not lie about it after a denial. The purpose of their reframing the arguments against me was to launch personal ad hominems against an irrelevant poster such as myself.
Popular
Back to top


1




