- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Coach Mainieri's comments after the game
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:52 pm to JustSmokin
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:52 pm to JustSmokin
quote:
So I gambled and we came up snake eyes. I was hoping that we could end up with a big inning out of it
kind of troubling. all we needed was a run. we didnt need a "big inning"
unless a big inning is just implying that we tie the game at the least
0
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:52 pm to roscoe mike
quote:
I'm not doubting some of our fans are retarded...but the highest chance of scoring one run in that situation is bunting the runner to second with less than two outs. That's baseball 101.
Exactly. The strategy should have been to move the runner via the bunt.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:53 pm to Holden Caulfield
quote:
bullshite you asswipe. Nothing changed.
You don't understand the difference between an 0-0 count to your 5 hole hitter, and a 2-0 count to your 5 hole hitter? Um, ok.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:54 pm to Holden Caulfield
quote:
OK, so nothing changed other than the count and the "guy had to throw a strike".
Priceless
Yeah, you still don't understand that a lot changes as the count changes. You are so incredibly stupid.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:55 pm to bayoujd
quote:
You don't understand the difference between an 0-0 count to your 5 hole hitter, and a 2-0 count to your 5 hole hitter? Um, ok.
Not in the bottom of the 9th and you're one run down. No, my friend nothing changed. The bunt was still the best option at that time.
Its all situational in baseball. That's what many here fail to understand.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:55 pm to Holden Caulfield
quote:This is actually incorrect. You have 2% greater chance of scoring with a man on first with no outs then with a runner on 2nd with 1 out. So when you sac bunt you actually purposefully lower your chances
I'm not doubting some of our fans are retarded...but the highest chance of scoring one run in that situation is bunting the runner to second with less than two out
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:55 pm to Holden Caulfield
quote:
Exactly. The strategy should have been to move the runner via the bunt.
How effective has Raph been at bunting this year?
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:56 pm to bayoujd
quote:
You don't understand the difference between an 0-0 count to your 5 hole hitter, and a 2-0 count to your 5 hole hitter? Um, ok.
No, apparently everything stays the same. Nothing changes as the count changes. Pitch selection has absolutely nothing to do with anything.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:56 pm to Holden Caulfield
quote:
Its all situational in baseball. That's what many here fail to understand.
How good of a bunter is Rhymes? Serious question.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:56 pm to PurpleAndGold86
quote:
Yeah, you still don't understand that a lot changes as the count changes.
Bottom of the ninth. One run down. Need one run to tie.
Those are the controlling factors at play. Not the freaking count.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:57 pm to Holden Caulfield
quote:
ts all situational in baseball.
You have clearly shown us all that you have absolutely no clue what this even means, speaking of failing to understand.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:57 pm to bayoujd
quote:
How good of a bunter is Rhymes? Serious question.
Probably not very good but CPM thought he could make the play initially.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:57 pm to bayoujd
quote:
How good of a bunter is Rhymes? Serious question.
we will never know
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:58 pm to Holden Caulfield
quote:
Those are the controlling factors at play. Not the freaking count.
So you're saying if the count is 2-2 you would still bunt b/c the count is not a factor?
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:58 pm to bayoujd
quote:
How good of a bunter is Rhymes? Serious question.
Outside of practice, I'm not sure he's ever bunted.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:58 pm to bayoujd
quote:
How effective has Raph been at bunting this year
How effective has Raph been with a runner on firts and 0 outs when not bunting this year?
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:59 pm to PurpleAndGold86
quote:
You have clearly shown us all that you have absolutely no clue what this even means, speaking of failing to understand.
There's a reason why everyone laughs at you on this board. Stating that you don't understand how situations dictate strategy is more than likely a contributing factor.
Posted on 6/17/13 at 1:59 pm to swamie
quote:
Nice fake Polo BTW! Is that a freaking whale? - GDI post of the year
lol, nice
Posted on 6/17/13 at 2:00 pm to lsupride87
quote:
This is actually incorrect. You have 2% greater chance of scoring with a man on first with no outs then with a runner on 2nd with 1 out. So when you sac bunt you actually purposefully lower your chances
99.9% of managers at any level of baseball bunt the runner to second in that situation...
Posted on 6/17/13 at 2:00 pm to Holden Caulfield
quote:
There's a reason why everyone laughs at you on this board. Stating that you don't understand how situations dictate strategy is more than likely a contributing factor.
Right.
Page 8 of 27
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News