I'll agree with you there. Tannehill is young to the game (as a QB) and will get better but right now I'll put him in the "good" category as opposed to great or elite.

He's not going to cost us the game but he's not going to be a playmaker and go out and get it for us either. Sherman puts him on a pretty tight leash against better defenses too.

This post was edited on 12/9/10 at 5:03 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Louie T

Member since Dec 2006

36680 posts

Posted on 12/9/10 at 5:04 pm to back9Tiger

quote:
Wasn't Michael recruited heavily by LSU?

He was recruited but not offered

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by coldhotwings

Mississippi

Member since Jan 2008

6497 posts

Posted on 12/9/10 at 5:15 pm to TxTiger82

quote:
We wanted Ford, who we got. We also wanted Trent Richardson, who we held out for until the end. Michael's "soft offer" never became a "committable offer."

Same deal with Texas. Aggie fans just want to believe they outrecruited LSU and Texas, but this is not the case.

They should just be happy that we all missed on him. Kid is a stud.

Only Texas missed on him. Miles wanted Ford and Richardson but only got the local kid. Ford is at least as talented as Michael and still has a hard time getting plentiful carries with Ridley getting the majority and Ware getting a handful also. The congestion at runningback will only be worse next season with Hilliard, Magee, and maybe Hill coming in. The only real "miss" was Trent Richardson and that one came down to the wire.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Mike Linebacker

Texas

Member since Sep 2009

3404 posts

Posted on 12/9/10 at 5:27 pm to ShreveportTIGER318

quote:
I love how LSU is the only team that can use this excuse. That is why any team loses.

Not really. Some teams are clearly beaten. Others make mistakes. I would sound like a sore loser if I said we're better than Arky having lost to them. But if we played them 10 times, we would win at least 5 of them.

Page 1 2 3 4