Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Dual threat Quarterback vs Pass first QB | Page 3 | Tiger Rant
Started By
Message

re: Dual threat Quarterback vs Pass first QB

Posted on 12/4/14 at 8:05 am to
Posted by baccsc
Texas
Member since Dec 2011
110 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 8:05 am to
Connor Cook, Michigan State

Evaluators are keeping a close eye on Cook after the Michigan State standout put together a pair of impressive performances in the Big Ten Championship Game and Rose Bowl. He displayed the poise, moxie and resiliency to make big plays in a high-pressure environment with the game on the line in those contests. Additionally, Cook showcased the pocket-passing skills and arm strength to thrive in an offense that places the burden on the quarterback to create plays in the passing game. With Michigan State expected to open it up in 2014, Cook could make a major move up the charts this season.
Posted by justustm2
Member since Sep 2005
4158 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Marcus Mariota, Oregon

There's a faction of NFL scouts that believed Mariota would have been the top quarterback in the 2014 class if he decided to jump to the pros following a spectacular sophomore campaign. However, the 6-foot-4, 212-pound playmaker elected to return to Eugene to continue to refine his footwork and fundamentals in the pocket. More importantly, Mariota is on a mission to lead the Ducks to the College Football Playoff, which would showcase his exceptional leadership skills and poise as a potential franchise quarterback. With a rare combination of skills as an athletic pocket passer, Mariota is a new-school quarterback capable of taking the NFL by storm in a few years.


Are you claiming Mariota is a pocket passer rathern than dual threat like you did with Blake Sims?
Posted by justustm2
Member since Sep 2005
4158 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 9:56 am to
You have listed Blake Sime ( a DT) Marioto (DT) Conner Cook (PP) and Bryce Petty (PP). So when coming up with the great PPs you are arguing for you come up with 2 PPs and two DTs.

The top ten rated playoff contenders and their type QBs are as follows:

1. Bama - DT
2. Oregon - DT
3. TCU - DT
4. Fla St. - DT
5. Ohio St. - DT
6. Baylor - PP
7. Arizona - DT
8. Mich St. - PP
9. Kansas St. - DT
10. Miss. St. - DT

I can see your argument that a pocket passer is much better than having a dual threat for success in college football. Oh, by the way, of the last 7 Heisman Trophy winning QBs, 6 were dual threats (Winston, Manziel. RGIII, Newton, Tebow, Troy Smith) and only one a pocket passer (Bradford).

Can we forever dispense with this insane notion that somehow a dual threat QB is a bad thing. There is no factual basis to support that clearly biased position. Having a bad QB is a bad thing, regardless of whether he is a DT or PP. The goal should be having a great QB, not a type of QB. Anyone who would pass on the above 7 Heisman winning QBs or the 8 QBs of the top 10 playoff teams because they are DTs is a nutjob with some type of wierd agenda.
Posted by DandyD
Pensacola, Fl
Member since Jan 2005
1252 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 10:10 am to
Can you tell me about Rivers? We never saw him play, as well as I can remember. Did he graduate or transfer. Was he a pure passer?
Posted by RedTigerRulz
BFE
Member since Oct 2013
15317 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Seems like most want the dual threat to start.


you would be correct sir!
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40128 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Can you tell me about Rivers?

Transferred to Vandy. They went 0-8 and he played quite poorly in what little he did play. That should give you an idea.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram