- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/3/10 at 10:39 am to Nuts4LSU
Yea already seen that, I still stand by my statement
Posted on 3/3/10 at 10:40 am to chowell21
quote:
I do think that LSU is a great program and has been for a long time,
Then why did you say: "We've only been good for a few years"?
Posted on 3/3/10 at 10:47 am to Nuts4LSU
I was referring to an elite status of the program, didn't mean to put just good, satisfied?
Posted on 3/3/10 at 10:56 am to TheDoc
quote:
"mastermind"...
first thing I think of when I think of crowton
Yes, sort of like in word association exercises, when people think "left" when they hear "right" or "down" when they hear "up". Diametrical opposites often remind people of each other.
Posted on 3/3/10 at 10:58 am to chowell21
quote:
LSU is good and storied yes, but elite not quite
Sure I'm not the first and won't be the last to say you're WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 3/3/10 at 10:58 am to Choctaw
quote:
I think you may be confusing elite with historic.
It appears Princeton is the elite of the elite.
I don't know how two NC in the last 6-7 years would not put a school into the elite status'
How many programs have two NC since the BCS was started? Seems hard to me to deny any that due of their elite status, but each to our own.
Posted on 3/3/10 at 11:03 am to RANDY44
quote:
WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
historically elite not quite
Posted on 3/3/10 at 11:04 am to Lonnie4LSU
read post above
Posted on 3/3/10 at 11:09 am to TheDoc
Anyone care to opine what the offense would have looked like had a RSFR and SO not been starting the past two years?
This is it for Crowton, IMO. JJ has had 3 years in the system.
This is it for Crowton, IMO. JJ has had 3 years in the system.
Posted on 3/3/10 at 11:10 am to TigerRagAndrew
quote:
This is it for Crowton, IMO
God be willing
Posted on 3/3/10 at 11:11 am to chowell21
Read the post above and pay special attention to the last phrase:
I understand you are speaking bout all time. I just don't think that says LSU could never be seen as elite.
quote:
It appears Princeton is the elite of the elite.
I don't know how two NC in the last 6-7 years would not put a school into the elite status'
How many programs have two NC since the BCS was started? Seems hard to me to deny any that due of their elite status, but each to our own.
I understand you are speaking bout all time. I just don't think that says LSU could never be seen as elite.
Posted on 3/3/10 at 11:14 am to Lonnie4LSU
First off I'm confused on what above post you mean 
but I also agree that one day LSU can be an Historically elite program, but we're just not there yet, and probally won't be with GC as the OC IMO
but I also agree that one day LSU can be an Historically elite program, but we're just not there yet, and probally won't be with GC as the OC IMOPosted on 3/3/10 at 11:23 am to TheDoc
The Wizard
Crowton is starting to remind me of the "Professor"
If he and Miles got extensions this year the AD needs to get fired.
Crowton is starting to remind me of the "Professor"
If he and Miles got extensions this year the AD needs to get fired.
Posted on 3/3/10 at 11:47 am to chowell21
When somebody does that, that means they agree with the statement
Posted on 3/3/10 at 11:48 am to TIGRLEE
?
Posted on 3/3/10 at 11:49 am to chowell21
You said nice original thought earlier
Posted on 3/3/10 at 11:51 am to TIGRLEE
dang dude that was a long time ago, and still unoriginal
Posted on 3/3/10 at 11:59 am to TigerRagAndrew
quote:
Anyone care to opine what the offense would have looked like had a RSFR and SO not been starting the past two years?
It probably would have looked better because it obviously would have been better coached. A coach good enough to spend 2008 actually developing a QB for 2009 not only would have had a better QB than we did in 2009, but also probably knows what he's doing a lot more than our coaches do.
2008's offensive problems would have been excusable if our coaches had spent that year developing someone for 2009. But they wasted 2008 not developing anybody, so they were right back in the same position in 2009. Barring a miracle turnaround by Jefferson in 2010, it looks like they wasted 2009, too.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News