- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How much difference will the flat seam baseball make?
Posted on 6/24/15 at 2:37 pm to southeasttiger113
Posted on 6/24/15 at 2:37 pm to southeasttiger113
You do realize... That you were only closer to the final number by 4. You were 6 under. I was 10 over.
And all the stats point toward it being a fluke that LSU hit less than 60. Our average and doubles were way up compared to most teams. But our HRs were lower.
Look at the stats Astro posted in my thread. Other teams saw a BA increase of 7%. And doubles that low too. Yet their HRs increased by 40. If we had gone along with the national average we would have had 58 HRs. If we had gone over like we did in every other category, it would have been 65.
The numbers don't lie. 51 is the outlier. You even being as close as 6 was just luck.
And all the stats point toward it being a fluke that LSU hit less than 60. Our average and doubles were way up compared to most teams. But our HRs were lower.
Look at the stats Astro posted in my thread. Other teams saw a BA increase of 7%. And doubles that low too. Yet their HRs increased by 40. If we had gone along with the national average we would have had 58 HRs. If we had gone over like we did in every other category, it would have been 65.
The numbers don't lie. 51 is the outlier. You even being as close as 6 was just luck.
1
Posted on 6/24/15 at 2:40 pm to southeasttiger113
10% increase of 41 is 4.... Max 45... That's 6 lower than 51.
20 more than 41 is 61. We hit 51. I was off by 10.
So I was 10 over. You were 6 under.
Did I really just have to explain that all to you?
20 more than 41 is 61. We hit 51. I was off by 10.
So I was 10 over. You were 6 under.
Did I really just have to explain that all to you?
This post was edited on 6/24/15 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 6/24/15 at 2:43 pm to ell_13
yea a 40 home run increase was caused by new baseballs and new baseballs alone. Couldn't have been anything else. Gotcha. We were talking about LSU, and I was considering a lot of things when I said that we weren't going to hit 60+ home runs this year and I was right. End of story. Me being as close as 6 was because baseball was my job for 2 years and I played every day at one of the best sports academies in the world for 4 years. I actually understand the game, you don't. You're a fricking loser that played at Millsaps and you think that means that you're suddenly an expert, leave the thinking to guys that understand the game champ, go take your shitty arse physics degree elsewhere and enjoy your $30k a yearPosted on 6/24/15 at 2:47 pm to ell_13
quote:It's 4.1. You can't hit .1 home run so you round up. Aren't you a statistics expert?
0% increase of 41 is 4.... Max 45... That's 6 lower than 51.
quote:You, along with other posters, were acting like "close to 70" wasn't farfetched. You never predicted that we just sat at 60, you and everyone else were SURE that we were going to go over. Dipshit
20 more than 41 is 61. We hit 51. I was off by 10.
quote:And we only lost to Mississippi State by a touchdown this year, was it really that close? Your prediction incredibly off and mine was rational and close, you're a moron bud
So I was 10 over. You were 6 under.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 2:47 pm to southeasttiger113
I meant percent. 40%
Please. Tell me why you didn't think LSU wouldnt get to 60. What did you take into account??? I'd love to know!
All you spewed here was the bats. That's the only reason you gave. Anything else? Why didn't you give them back then? Let's hear it.
Please. Tell me why you didn't think LSU wouldnt get to 60. What did you take into account??? I'd love to know!
All you spewed here was the bats. That's the only reason you gave. Anything else? Why didn't you give them back then? Let's hear it.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 2:48 pm to southeasttiger113
Did you seriously just round 4.1 up???????? :rotflmao:
:rotflmao:Posted on 6/24/15 at 2:50 pm to southeasttiger113
We hit 2 more HRs this year and I'm as close as you. But yeah.
You are being rational. And I'm a dipshit. Yet all the other stats in the world say that 60 was never far fetched and its "off" that we only got 51.
You are being rational. And I'm a dipshit. Yet all the other stats in the world say that 60 was never far fetched and its "off" that we only got 51.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 2:52 pm to southeasttiger113
quote:
Me being as close as 6 was because baseball was my job for 2 years and I played every day at one of the best sports academies in the world for 4 years. I actually understand the game, you don't. You're a fricking loser that played at Millsaps and you think that means that you're suddenly an expert, leave the thinking to guys that understand the game champ, go take your shitty arse physics degree elsewhere and enjoy your $30k a year
You are an idiot. I feel bad for you. Posted on 6/24/15 at 2:55 pm to ell_13
Oh my god
Posted on 6/24/15 at 2:56 pm to OneMoreTime
I'm crying.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 2:56 pm to ell_13
Wow more hypotheticals...big surprise. Crawfish more stats for me so you can feel like less of a dumbass! A ball won't add 20 home runs for one team over the course of a season, you're a complete moron if you think it will. Stick to your day job bud, or better yet go to sports Academy and buy a minor league and old college baseball, put them in a bucket, whirl it around, and tell me if you can tell the difference between the two. Your thinking is flawed, sorry but I was right and you were wrong, blow me
Posted on 6/24/15 at 2:57 pm to OneMoreTime
Except I was right and everyone else was wrong? Yea I'm still an idiot
Posted on 6/24/15 at 2:59 pm to southeasttiger113
We increased by more than 10%. You were wrong, and you have no idea how math or statistics work. You are an idiot.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 3:00 pm to southeasttiger113
Whoa. You can't tell the different? The leather alone makes it obvious.
Should I pull up and find every team that increased HRs by 20 over the last year?
Are you surprised that we had a 25% increase in HRs? You said 5-10% would shock you. You should be floored at the increase!!!!!1
Should I pull up and find every team that increased HRs by 20 over the last year?
Are you surprised that we had a 25% increase in HRs? You said 5-10% would shock you. You should be floored at the increase!!!!!1
This post was edited on 6/24/15 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 6/24/15 at 3:02 pm to southeasttiger113
Please come to the unanchored thread... everyone needs to see this.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 3:02 pm to ell_13
Vanderbilt's HRs increased by 47 from last year to this year. The new ball surely didn't have any impact on them.
Posted on 6/24/15 at 3:02 pm to OneMoreTime
I never even said that we were going to hit 10% more home runs, I was referring to offensive production and I've just been going with it since I'm still closer to being right than him. My main argument was that it's fricking ridiculous to say that we hit over 60 HR's this year and I was 100% right
Posted on 6/24/15 at 3:03 pm to southeasttiger113
quote:But if we had increased our numbers by 40% like the rest of college baseball, then we would have had 58. How is that ridiculous? Do I need to look up the word for you?
My main argument was that it's fricking ridiculous to say that we hit over 60 HR's this year
This post was edited on 6/24/15 at 3:04 pm
Posted on 6/24/15 at 3:04 pm to OneMoreTime
Yep, ball is definitely the reason that they hit 47 more you people are idiots
you people are idiotsPosted on 6/24/15 at 3:05 pm to ell_13
We didn't. We didn't even come close and we even played more games. Why don't you find the average increase for the top 25 HR teams instead of clinging to some stat derived from 300 teams?
Page 10 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News