- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Keiland Problems?
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
oh damn that's what this is all about?
what a moron
bilj was dogging maximumtiger at the end of the meachem thread so apparently thats what how bout Favre's cowboys was thinking of when he popped off.
0
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:38 pm to Louie T
quote:
06 schedule > 07 schedule
You see, that would be you attempting to downplay LSU's 2007 NC.
Oh, forgot one of the main points you need to learn to be a top shelf Club C.J. member. You must never under any circumstances craitize Lord Saban or ANY of his 16 losses at LSU. You can't admit Arnsparger was a better Defensive coach by a country mile. You must continue Saban as "Bob the Builder" fantasy, forgetting the fact that LSU had well over 600 wins before he arrived. And under NO circumstances should you mention Saban winning 10 or more games just 2 times in 12 years of college coaching.
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:38 pm to tubucoco
you think maximus is maximum tiger?
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:39 pm to tubucoco
quote:
take your Commodores punk arse away from boy, before stuff feathers up your arse
i think you left out a couple words there, bud
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:39 pm to Sammich
quote:
You see, that would be you attempting to downplay LSU's 2007 NC.
no, i'm stating facts
or are you going to claim that we had a harder road in 2007?
quote:
You must never under any circumstances craitize Lord Saban or ANY of his 16 losses at LSU.
was saban our coach in 2006?
quote:
And under NO circumstances should you mention Saban winning 10 or more games just 2 times in 12 years of college coaching.
how many years has saban coached with the 12-game regular season schedule?
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:40 pm to Sammich
quote:How am I attempting to downplay the schedule you stupid bastard? The 06 schedule was one of the toughest schedules ever. Saying the 07 season isn't as good isn't knocking the 06 schedule.
You see, that would be you attempting to downplay LSU's 2007 NC.
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
don't matter, back to the topic at hand, don't want people to think I'm serious. 
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:41 pm to Sammich
quote:What does any of this have to do with Saban? He didn't coach here in 06?
You see, that would be you attempting to downplay LSU's 2007 NC.
Oh, forgot one of the main points you need to learn to be a top shelf Club C.J. member. You must never under any circumstances craitize Lord Saban or ANY of his 16 losses at LSU. You can't admit Arnsparger was a better Defensive coach by a country mile. You must continue Saban as "Bob the Builder" fantasy, forgetting the fact that LSU had well over 600 wins before he arrived. And under NO circumstances should you mention Saban winning 10 or more games just 2 times in 12 years of college coaching.
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:41 pm to Sammich
quote:
You must never under any circumstances craitize Lord Saban or ANY of his 16 losses at LSU
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:42 pm to Louie T
yeah, but it was Saban's talent
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:43 pm to Sammich
quote:
You see, that would be you attempting to downplay LSU's 2007 NC.
not really, its more of a pattern
2003 schedule is easier than 2004 schedule
2005 schedule is easier than 2006
2007 schedule will be easier than 2008 probably
playing Florida and Auburn on the road sucks and then Arkansas only had 0 sec losses going into their final regular season game in 2006
This post was edited on 8/9/08 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:44 pm to tubucoco
quote:Max, I think he just admitted he was wrong. He's also really sorry for the confusion.
don't matter, back to the topic at hand, don't want people to think I'm serious.
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:44 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
playing Florida and Auburn on the road sucks.
and in 2006 UF was the #1 team and AU was a top 10 team
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
but to rarely give keiland the benefit of the doubt. i really don't get it, especially with the auburn game example
there is less than a handful of fans on here who don't think that KW is a phenomenal talent and can't wait to see him carry the ball more. And we didn't lose the Auburn game, so you're not going to get quite the some reaction.
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:44 pm to Sammich
quote:
You must never under any circumstances craitize Lord Saban or ANY of his 16 losses at LSU.
btw, i've defended miles a ton on this board and was one of the few doing it after arkansas
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
OSU
VT
UT
UF
AU
according to the AP
South Carolina & Kentucky were both ranked when we played them. Too bad they blew up later. Also, the 2007 team actaully played the #1 ranked team by both the AP & Coaches polls. The 2003 did not.
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:46 pm to Louie T
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:47 pm to Sammich
look, 2006 is only the 2nd team in NCAA history to play 4 top 10 teams on the road. The schedule sucked, and we still made a bcs bowl with it
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:47 pm to Sammich
quote:What does that have to do with 06? We played the eventual #1 team in the Coaches, AP, and BCS in 06.
Also, the 2007 team actaully played the #1 ranked team by both the AP & Coaches polls. The 2003 did not.
Posted on 8/9/08 at 4:47 pm to Sammich
quote:
South Carolina & Kentucky were both ranked when we played them.
south carolina finished 6-6 and didn't go to a bowl
quote:
Too bad they blew up later.
no. they were just never that good
quote:
Also, the 2007 team actaully played the #1 ranked team by both the AP & Coaches polls. The 2003 did not.
who is talking about 2003? it's 2006 schedule v 2007 schedule. 2006 wins EASILY
Page 19 of 37
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News