- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lee did well
Posted on 9/4/11 at 12:06 am to bayoubengals88
Posted on 9/4/11 at 12:06 am to bayoubengals88
Overall he played well. Had a few bad passes, a few drops, one or two bad scrambles. But he did make some good, key throws, got a nice TD, and didn't give the game away. He'll build on this game and only get better.
Posted on 9/4/11 at 12:06 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:at the quarterback position dumbass...
coming off a 40-27 win against the #3 team in the nation??? You are an idiot. Stop posting. Never come back, fgt.
context is a clue. use it.
eta: same for lsuzealot. we have become accustomed to mediocre qb play to the point where people are posting "lee did great" when in fact he did not. THATS ALL im saying.
The team as a whole is very good.
This post was edited on 9/4/11 at 12:09 am
Posted on 9/4/11 at 12:07 am to TigerNutwhack
Why is everyone upset over so-so QB play, it's been said time and again that in order for LSU to do well they just need a QB that can manage the football game, that's exactly what Lee did tonight.
Posted on 9/4/11 at 12:07 am to gotygers
quote:
Lee did well
Compared to last years opening victory against a team with half the team suspended and only scoring 30 points.
A Lee lead offense scored 40 on the #3 ranked team in the country and put up the same type of numbers as Jordan (except in said opening victory where he had one of his best games)!
Lee could have played better...and he will play better!
Big "Victory for LSU"!
Posted on 9/4/11 at 12:09 am to bayoubengals88
quote:
context is a clue. use it.
So you don't take the dropped passes, or the limited playcalling into context? Really dude...you are a terrible poster. The sad thing is that you are not alone.
Posted on 9/4/11 at 12:11 am to PortCityTiger24
quote:
He just needs to get into a rythem.
That pretty much sums it up.
Lee was super conservative, which was a good game plan.
On the other hand, he was totally out of sync with his receivers on routes. The timing was just awful, but I suppose that's what happens when you have receivers who spent the last year getting their timing down with Jefferson, who's timing on throws is day-and-night different than Lee's.
There were a lot of "almost" big plays, and optimistically, I think that Lee and the receivers just need to get more used to each other in game situations.
And although the timing on routes was worse than I had anticipated, Lee's abilities to play safe and minimize mistakes was better than I had anticipated.
So going forward, I think it will be a great passing year for the Tigers, and given that we scored 40 points against #3 Oregon, a great offensive scoring year too.
Posted on 9/4/11 at 12:12 am to PortCityTiger24
i look at a qb that still looks extremely scared at the first sign of collapsing pocket and consistently throws off his back foot. If you are excited about that, Im happy for you.
Posted on 9/4/11 at 12:12 am to bayoubengals88
quote:You must have hated Flynn and Mauck, loved Russell, Hated Tyler
2,800 yards
65% accuracy
25 tds
less than 10 ints.
Posted on 9/4/11 at 12:16 am to bayoubengals88
No but he played well in the 2nd half. He can build on this!
Posted on 9/4/11 at 12:16 am to tduecen
I liked Mauck...he threw for 28 tds and i think about 2800 yds.
Flynn was certainly good enough.
Jamarcus had an incredible year in 06
I would take herb tyler any day because of the option he ran so well.
Flynn was certainly good enough.
Jamarcus had an incredible year in 06
I would take herb tyler any day because of the option he ran so well.
Posted on 9/4/11 at 12:20 am to bayoubengals88
quote:14 interceptions and less than 65%
Mauck...he threw for 28 tds and i think about 2800 yds.
quote:56%, less than 2500 yards, 11 interceptions and 21 touchdowns, did not reach 1 of your criteria
Flynn was certainly good enough.
quote:Where his season high of rushing in any season was 279 yards on 96 attempts?
I would take herb tyler any day because of the option he ran so well.
Posted on 9/4/11 at 12:21 am to bayoubengals88
good job, Lee!
Rec's need to do catch those..offense will be better.
Rec's need to do catch those..offense will be better.
Posted on 9/4/11 at 12:39 am to bayoubengals88
40 points came with 4 turnovers. How many points would we have scored with 275 yards total office without our D?! Not 40 - we need to keep improving
We won, that's what counts.
We won, that's what counts.
Posted on 9/4/11 at 12:40 am to bayoubengals88
quote:
2,800 yards
65% accuracy
25 tds
less than 10 ints.
those are very close to heisman stats, bro.
This post was edited on 9/4/11 at 12:41 am
Popular
Back to top


1









