Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us What's So Wrong With Playing Man to Man | Page 3 | Tiger Rant
Started By
Message

re: What's So Wrong With Playing Man to Man

Posted on 9/9/09 at 6:03 pm to
Posted by gxlfnut
BIG B R
Member since Oct 2005
2928 posts
Posted on 9/9/09 at 6:03 pm to
a zone can work if everyone does their job, defensive ends contain the play, defensive backs are aware of the location of the ball, the line pressure the qb
Posted by Alltheway Tigers!
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7952 posts
Posted on 9/9/09 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

I don't mind the zone play I just wish they would play tighter to the LOS.

We have PP on one he should knock the hell out of every WR he faces right off the line.



See, that is thinking and I agree with it. 15 yards off the receiver is a bit much.

All this man coverage talk leads to broken hearts, drinking problems and abused pets.

Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 9/9/09 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

Have we prevented the big play for the past two years?


we played a lot of man coverage last season, a lot more than zone
Posted by TheHat
Delusionville
Member since Feb 2007
3855 posts
Posted on 9/9/09 at 6:42 pm to
If you play man coverage in this conference you HAVE to get to the quarterback quickly. You need two shutdown corners, and defensive ends that can rush the quarterback while maintaining control of their rush. These are two things that LSU does not have in the starting lineup. I believe Peterson will develop into a great corner, but he is not there yet.
Posted by mrbayoublu
Acadiana
Member since Jan 2004
2949 posts
Posted on 9/9/09 at 7:11 pm to
This makes a lot of sense to me.
Posted by epbart
new york city
Member since Mar 2005
3269 posts
Posted on 9/9/09 at 7:11 pm to
I do agree (and based on the threads since the game so do most people) that there should be more pressure and disrupting of the opposing offense. It isn't strictly a question of man coverage vs. zone coverage though. I believe every defensive coordinator employs both at different times, and sometimes combinations. Think back to 2003 in the championship game-- Marcus Spears was in zone coverage when he intercepted that pass that he returned for the TD.

Also, the game continually evolves. Since the early 2000's, various iterations of the spread have become prevalent. What worked defensively 5 years ago may not work as well now against offenses that have become more spread oriented.

That is not to say that all is fine and dandy. The last year or two it seems LSU doesn't get to the quarterback very well, and gets nickel and dimed to death if they try. Other teams seem to do a better job of applying pressure-- whether from running man or zone based schemes, I don't know.

At times, I thought LSU's defense looked much improved this past weekend. But I was also frustrated at their inability to really stop UW. If nothing else, LSU's defense got a sh*tload of reps this past weekend, was able to get a lot of players in for meaningful reps, and should have a lot of game film to use for improvement. What I hope to see as the season unfolds is an improved ability to apply pressure with the front four, and disguising pressure and coverage better so they don't get burned as much when they blitz, etc.
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 9/9/09 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

If you play man coverage in this conference you HAVE to get to the quarterback quickly.


+100000000000000000000000
Posted by lascotty
Falls Church, VA
Member since Oct 2006
52 posts
Posted on 9/9/09 at 8:50 pm to
The biggest problems I can see with playing man to man are named Jai Eugene and Chris Hawkins. If they can do it, then I'm all for it. I just don't think they can right now.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram