- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Real Estate Bubble Numbers
Posted on 12/2/11 at 10:35 am to Tiger JJ
Posted on 12/2/11 at 10:35 am to Tiger JJ
Another fun fact, referencing Fannie/Freddie/FHA:
LINK
quote:
The collapse of the market for mortgage-backed securities has made them even more crucial to the current functioning of the housing market. The pair and the Federal Housing Administration together now guarantee about 90 percent of all new mortgages, far above their historic level.
LINK
Posted on 12/2/11 at 10:38 am to LSU0358
In my everyday professional life, we typically say "borrowers" instead of "owners".
Posted on 12/2/11 at 11:02 am to 90proofprofessional
Not that it affects what you posted specifically (although indirectly I guess, with the "collapse of the market for mortgage-backed securities bit"), I'm always skeptical of articles that have seemingly large oversights. Fannie Mae's combined portfolio alone is (according to Q3), 2.8 trillion. The article says the combined FNM/FRE is 1.5T. Just another comment about half assed finance journalism.
Popular
Back to top


1




