- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:41 pm to Sophandros
quote:
I should be happy, as he may get a chance to rehabilitate his image in New Orleans for the 2011 season...
yeah, he would take the Tulane job
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:41 pm to bomber77
quote:
You must be on location there.
I have friends who are Texas Tech alumni.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:41 pm to wrlakers
quote:
They were going into that hearing today to allow a judge who went to Baylor to decide whether Leach was going to coach on Saturday. Any time you walk into court, it's a crap shoot. The way to eliminate the risk for Tech and to make sure that the judge didn't decide who their coach was--fire Leach. I'll bet Leach and his lawyer didn't see that coming when they filed the suit.
Good point, hadn't thought of this angle.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:42 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
yeah, he would take the Tulane job
You never know...
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:42 pm to bomber77
I thought it was just an injunction to allow him to coach the game, not a full-on lawsuit against the university?
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:43 pm to MStreetTiger
quote:I'm actually pretty sure that Mike Leach's retarded brother is on this site.
It proves nothing because no one on this messageboard knows what happened.
And I mean that guy is a goddamn retard. I was on another board five years ago, and he was pimping the shite out of Mike to get hired by LSU. He threatened to sue me when I said that Leach was basically 5% better than Hal Mumme.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:44 pm to RedPop4
quote:That's true...so far. By firing him TT raised the stakes.
I thought it was just an injunction to allow him to coach the game, not a full-on lawsuit against the university?
And Leach and his lawyer absolutely knew the firing was coming. That's why they went before the judge - they had nothing to lose.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:45 pm to RedPop4
quote:There is no such thing as just an injunction. I know this because this is the kind of law I practice. You must have a lawsuit against the person you are asking the court to enter an injunction against. I guess I'll walk down the hall and read the petition myself. Back in minute.
I thought it was just an injunction to allow him to coach the game, not a full-on lawsuit against the university?
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:46 pm to xiv
quote:Leach's all time percentage -- 66.1%. Mumme's all time winning percentage -- 37.7%.
And I mean that guy is a goddamn retard. I was on another board five years ago, and he was pimping the shite out of Mike to get hired by LSU. He threatened to sue me when I said that Leach was basically 5% better than Hal Mumme.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:46 pm to Cold Cous Cous
quote:Yeah but should I be sued for it?
Leach's all time percentage -- 66.1%. Mumme's all time winning percentage -- 37.7%.
frick you, Tim Leach. You're retarded.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:47 pm to wrlakers
quote:
There is no such thing as just an injunction. I know this because this is the kind of law I practice. You must have a lawsuit against the person you are asking the court to enter an injunction against.
What he means is that Leach was simply asking for the injunction, and no monetary damages as of yet. But now he will be asking for $$$
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:48 pm to Cold Cous Cous
Actually I was asking both, I appreciate the knowledge.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:51 pm to RedPop4
quote:
The way to eliminate the risk for Tech and to make sure that the judge didn't decide who their coach was--fire Leach.
Basically this. Leach fricked up by going to the courts and over the head of the AD and the school president. They can basically spin this as "Coach Leach refused to adhere to the administration's decision regarding the suspension, so he was terminated for insubordination."
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:52 pm to lpgreat1
Does Florida need a coach?
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:55 pm to lpgreat1
quote:
Basically this. Leach fricked up by going to the courts and over the head of the AD and the school president. They can basically spin this as "Coach Leach refused to adhere to the administration's decision regarding the suspension, so he was terminated for insubordination."
Apparently Leach's contract allowed him to be fired without cause, so it's not like they had to show insubordination. If they did have to show good cause, an employee exercising his lawful right to resolve a dispute in court is probably not going to qualify as "insubordination." The AD seems to believe he's king shite of f mountain here, but even he has to follow the law.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:56 pm to Sophandros
quote:
Then again, I should be happy, as he may get a chance to rehabilitate his image in New Orleans for the 2011 season...
He had a guest role on an episode of Friday Night Lights this season. IMO if coaching doesn't work out, he could always go the acting route.... or weatherman.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:57 pm to wrlakers
quote:Well, the dude who has it is in a deposition, so I can't get it right now. He's a Tech grad and used to work for the judge. I don't know what the cause of action was. Seems like it would have to be a breach of contract because a violation of due process is normally what is called a "1983 claim," and I don't think that fits this case.
I'll walk down the hall and read the petition myself. Back in minute.
Posted on 12/30/09 at 12:59 pm to wrlakers
Posted on 12/30/09 at 1:01 pm to lpgreat1
quote:
Basically this. Leach fricked up by going to the courts and over the head of the AD and the school president.
what choice did he have?
yall are acting like he would not have been fired if he hadn't gone to court.
Popular
Back to top


2



