- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Top Level NFL Ownership statement:
Posted on 7/22/25 at 7:50 am to Corinthians420
Posted on 7/22/25 at 7:50 am to Corinthians420
quote:
You guys keep using arrest as the example but the contract says anything the team feels like isnt good.
Ok. So don’t do anything stupid.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:30 am to Wildcat98USA
Mike Brown is pretty horrible but I agree with him 100% on this.
Stay out of trouble, get paid.
Stay out of trouble, get paid.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 9:50 am to TackySweater
quote:Like wearing a Trump hat to an interview?
Ok. So don’t do anything stupid.
With this clause in the contract Bosa could have been cut for just that in San Fran
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:01 am to lsupride87
quote:
Like wearing a Trump hat to an interview?
Sure. Don’t get political if your employer doesn’t want that.
quote:
With this clause in the contract Bosa could have been cut for just that in San Fran
It wasn’t in his contract though.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:10 am to Corinthians420
quote:
if Player makes any public comment, including but not limited to the newspaper, magazines, television, radio, social media or internet that breaches Player's obligation of loyalty to Club and/or undermines the public's respect for the Club, Club coaches, or Club management (provided that upon the first such comment Player shall receive a written warning and upon the second and any other subsequent comment, Player shall be in default of this Guarantee
That's pretty bad
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:15 am to TackySweater
quote:so you understand why no player who isn’t a fricking idiot would sign this now? Good. You were confused at first
It wasn’t in his contract though
quote:signing that is asinine
if Player makes any public comment, including but not limited to the newspaper, magazines, television, radio, social media or internet that breaches Player's obligation of loyalty to Club and/or undermines the public's respect for the Club, Club coaches, or Club management (provided that upon the first such comment Player shall receive a written warning and upon the second and any other subsequent comment, Player shall be in default of this Guarantee
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:20 am to lsupride87
Obligation of loyalty
The nfl is so evil
The nfl is so evil
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:22 am to lsupride87
quote:
You were confused at first
Except I wasn’t lol.
quote:
so you understand why no player who isn’t a fricking idiot would sign this now?
If this is what the league is moving towards, then that’s what it’s moving towards. It happens in business on a daily basis.
quote:
signing that is asinine
You can argue that the owners have been asinine up until now not making it a part of contracts. Looks like they are trying to fix that.
This post was edited on 7/22/25 at 10:23 am
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:22 am to TackySweater
quote:you are confused again
If this is what the league is moving towards
This is only the bengals doing it
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:22 am to TackySweater
quote:
You can argue that the owners have been asinine up until now not making it a part of contracts
Please try to make that argument
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:23 am to lsupride87
quote:
This is only the bengals doing it
Someone has to start it.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:24 am to DBG
quote:
Please try to make that argument
It’s smart to just guarantee money to someone with no provisions about not doing dumb shite?
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:27 am to TackySweater
Buddy, no agent on earth is ever letting their client sign this:
quote:
if Player makes any public comment, including but not limited to the newspaper, magazines, television, radio, social media or internet that breaches Player's obligation of loyalty to Club and/or undermines the public's respect for the Club, Club coaches, or Club management (provided that upon the first such comment Player shall receive a written warning and upon the second and any other subsequent comment, Player shall be in default of this Guarantee
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:28 am to TackySweater
Nope, don’t twist it. Not “doing stupid shite”, specifically making critical comments about the organization. Make that argument.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:30 am to DBG
By the way, apparently the bengals have been doing this for 25 years:
What a sensitive crybaby failson Mike Brown is
quote:
In the agent community, the stipulation is known as the "Pickens Clause," nicknamed for former Cincinnati wide receiver Carl Pickens, who public lambasting of the franchise was a source of consternation to owner Mike Brown and other team officials. The team began to include the clause in rookie contracts in 2000 and, in several instances, it was a major sticking point in negotiations and led to a few lengthy holdouts.
What a sensitive crybaby failson Mike Brown is
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:31 am to DBG
Damn that means that many agents let their clients sign that.
Wild
Wild
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:32 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Buddy, no agent on earth is ever letting their client sign this:
I haven’t been keeping up with this story. Is this the 1st year they have included this?
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:35 am to dj30
Apparently they have been doing that since 2000 which is wild. I have never heard of anything like that and can't believe any agent of a 1st or 2nd round pick, or major FA let them sign that clause
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:36 am to Wildcat98USA
I believe that fully guaranteed contracts are out of control, especially if they are more than two years.
I also believe that the language “conduct detrimental to football” is too vague and could easily be used by the team inappropriately. However, when that language is used ONLY in describing the “guaranteed” part of the contract, I’m more likely to ultimately agree with its inclusion.
I also believe that the language “conduct detrimental to football” is too vague and could easily be used by the team inappropriately. However, when that language is used ONLY in describing the “guaranteed” part of the contract, I’m more likely to ultimately agree with its inclusion.
Posted on 7/22/25 at 10:40 am to Fun Bunch
The first round slotting alleviated most of the holdouts, but prior to 2012, they had a crazy history of hold outs:
2001 Justin Smith- missed all of camp, signed Saturday before week 1
2002 Levi Jones- signed 1 day before camp
2003 Carson Palmer- signed before draft
2004 Chris Perry- 11 day holdout
2005 David Pollack- 17 day holdout
2006 Jonathan Joseph- signed day 1 of camp
2007 Leon Hall- 1 day holdout
2008 Keith Rivers- 10 day holdout
2009 Andre Smith- 30 day holdout
2010 Jermaine Gresham- 10 day holdout
Impossible to know how many go the clause waived. Clearly Mike Brown is running a steady ship up there
2001 Justin Smith- missed all of camp, signed Saturday before week 1
2002 Levi Jones- signed 1 day before camp
2003 Carson Palmer- signed before draft
2004 Chris Perry- 11 day holdout
2005 David Pollack- 17 day holdout
2006 Jonathan Joseph- signed day 1 of camp
2007 Leon Hall- 1 day holdout
2008 Keith Rivers- 10 day holdout
2009 Andre Smith- 30 day holdout
2010 Jermaine Gresham- 10 day holdout
Impossible to know how many go the clause waived. Clearly Mike Brown is running a steady ship up there
Popular
Back to top


1





