- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LOST "LAX" S6.E1/2.
Posted on 2/3/10 at 5:20 pm to coloradoBengal
Posted on 2/3/10 at 5:20 pm to coloradoBengal
quote:
Who was it that the monster tried to take into the ground? It didn't kill this person, it tried to take them down in the ground but they got away somehow. I can't remember
Locke
Posted on 2/3/10 at 5:31 pm to Decatur
quote:
Didn't the pilot say he could make contact with help by using the plane's radio? If I remember correctly, I think he got a signal right before Smokey snatched him away.
The pilot could have ruined Smokey/MIB's plan from the get-go.
This is still a theory in progress.
Just rewatched that clip: The survivors were at the cockpit to get the transceiver, and the Monster would probably know this. Once there the Pilot points out where the transceiver is and he can't get a signal. The Monster then grabs the Pilot. The transceiver is the same one they used to pick up the Rousseau's signal. The Monster knew that having the transceiver would do nothing, and it just allowed him to make the survivors fearful of him.
Posted on 2/3/10 at 5:39 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
The Monster knew that having the transceiver would do nothing, and it just allowed him to make the survivors fearful of him.
But the Monster killing someone simply at the will of the MIB, doesn't fit with the Monster being a "judge".
Posted on 2/3/10 at 5:41 pm to coloradoBengal
quote:
But the Monster killing someone simply at the will of the MIB, doesn't fit with the Monster being a "judge".
You've watched LA X right? The Monster and MIB are one in the same. I'm saying that the Pilot was dead when the plane crashed, and the monster manifested itself into the Pilot. He didn't kill the Pilot in an other words.
Posted on 2/3/10 at 5:49 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
You've watched LA X right? The Monster and MIB are one in the same. I'm saying that the Pilot was dead when the plane crashed, and the monster manifested itself into the Pilot. He didn't kill the Pilot in an other words.
No offense... but that's pretty weak.
Edit: and The MIB/Monster relationship is complex I think. I posted a bunch of questions on that earlier. The cabin, the ash ring, Christian on and off the island, etc. I don't know. And MIB contends that he is a man, not a monster.
This post was edited on 2/3/10 at 5:51 pm
Posted on 2/3/10 at 5:59 pm to AtlBrett
quote:
I'd like to hear you guys' thoughts on the MIB saying to the crowd outside the statue "I'm very disappointed in you" when he knocked Richard out and began to walk off....I thought that was an odd statement.
He was their slave for years. Recall that they could "summon" the smoke monster to be their judge and jury as long as he was trapped in the mythical cabin. The real question remains: Where was Jacob. It seems he may have inhabited the body of Christian for a while (the white shoed version) to help the Losties.
The black shoed version of Christian was smokie and we see him in several places. In fact, it was the dark Christian who told Locke to move the island. After this, we see smokie is freed. Perhaps the island jumped to a time where someone loyal to him broke the ash, i.e. himself.
Posted on 2/3/10 at 6:04 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
(the white shoed version)
The black shoed version
frick. I didn't notice there were different shoes... is this for real??
Posted on 2/3/10 at 6:09 pm to coloradoBengal
quote:
I didn't notice there were different shoes... is this for real??
Yes, the color of Christian's shoes are a BIG deal.
My Tennis Shoes Theory
Posted on 2/3/10 at 6:56 pm to theunknownknight
So what are the rules of killing black?
why don't they just walk up to him and sprinkle ash around him....if he can't cross ash.
post not to anyone, just questions I'm throwing out.
why don't they just walk up to him and sprinkle ash around him....if he can't cross ash.
post not to anyone, just questions I'm throwing out.
Posted on 2/3/10 at 7:00 pm to Iona Fan Man
quote:I don't know what all the rules are, but after last night, two things are apparent...
why don't they just walk up to him and sprinkle ash around him....if he can't cross ash.
1. Ash appears to be nothing more than a slight inconvenience to the Monster if its not used properly
2. If you try to "kill" MIB, he gets really gets annoyed and kills everyone involved.
Posted on 2/3/10 at 7:20 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Once there the Pilot points out where the transceiver is and he can't get a signal.
I must have been thinking of the signal that Boone got when he was in Yemi's plane. He did get a response, didn't he?
Posted on 2/3/10 at 7:36 pm to Decatur
quote:
I must have been thinking of the signal that Boone got when he was in Yemi's plane. He did get a response, didn't he?
Yeah he did, but it was Bernard on the other line. He had a radio and very coincidentally turned it on at the exact time Boone did.
Posted on 2/3/10 at 8:22 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Something tells me the Monster can't harm any person it perceives as morally righteous
then explain to me why he killed Eko? did the "monster" not see Eko as morally righteous because of all the killing? even though he esentially repented and was a follower of God/the island?
Posted on 2/3/10 at 8:26 pm to norman handshake
just finished the re-watch -love the line in the airport when Locke thanks Jack, but "there's nothing anybody can do...."
".......nothing's irreversible" - Jack
".......nothing's irreversible" - Jack
Posted on 2/3/10 at 8:28 pm to norman handshake
Not that I buy this either way yet, but Eko basically said he wasn't sorry for all that he had done because he did his best with what life had given him. Goes kind of with the Catholic notion that a priest can't give absolution unless the person is repentant.
This post was edited on 2/3/10 at 8:28 pm
Posted on 2/3/10 at 8:49 pm to norman handshake
The conversation between Locke & Shephard in the airport was pretty deep.
"Nothing is irreversible."
didn't see that Stu posted something about this...my bad
"Nothing is irreversible."
didn't see that Stu posted something about this...my bad
This post was edited on 2/3/10 at 8:50 pm
Posted on 2/3/10 at 8:51 pm to norman handshake
quote:
then explain to me why he killed Eko? did the "monster" not see Eko as morally righteous because of all the killing? even though he esentially repented and was a follower of God/the island?
I explained it earlier. He felt no remorse for the sins he committed and did not repent for them. If he had repented, I think the Monster would have spared Eko.
Posted on 2/3/10 at 9:01 pm to OMLandshark
Popular
Back to top



0




