- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/24/08 at 9:51 pm to jlc05
yes it is.. i am faulting the league
this league is so screwed up when it comes to enforcing rules... sometimes they apply sometimes they dont
this league is so screwed up when it comes to enforcing rules... sometimes they apply sometimes they dont
Posted on 11/24/08 at 9:51 pm to The Eric
quote:
if they are a performance enhancer then its still not fair to the other team...
Again its not a performance enhancer.
Posted on 11/24/08 at 9:52 pm to The Eric
it's used as a mask for substances... and the way the professional leagues has become i would have to assume they are trying to mask something greater. if its against the rules, then it is cheating.
ethics 101
ethics 101
Posted on 11/24/08 at 9:53 pm to The Eric
It wasnt a performance enhancer moron
Posted on 11/24/08 at 9:53 pm to The Eric
Did someone piss in your Cheerios when you were a kid, so now anything involving urine should involve jailtime?
Posted on 11/24/08 at 9:54 pm to Icansee4miles
if something is against the rules then it is cheating
Posted on 11/24/08 at 9:54 pm to Choctaw
The manufacturer didnt inform the players that there was a banned substance like they are obligated to.
Posted on 11/24/08 at 9:54 pm to The Eric
maybe you should educate yourself on the appeal. They are appealing because they called the NFL and the NFL said that product was ok and then they tested positive for a banned substance that the product contained. So they are appealing because the NFL said it was ok but then banned them.
Do you get it now or do you still want to call them "cheaters"?
Do you get it now or do you still want to call them "cheaters"?
Posted on 11/24/08 at 9:56 pm to nino2469
if the NFL said it was ok and then renigged then i see the point... but is there hard evidence that the NFL said it was ok or was it just heresay
Posted on 11/24/08 at 10:00 pm to The Eric
according to a lawyer on the case the person that testified for the NFL said the NFL knew the product contained a banned substance but never put it on the list.
Posted on 11/24/08 at 10:01 pm to nino2469
thank you... for not being a douche... i will now say that i dont see a problem with them playing
Posted on 11/24/08 at 10:02 pm to The Eric
quote:
it just heresay
They have not been accused of trying to get the NFL to change religions have they?
Posted on 11/24/08 at 10:04 pm to The Eric
What????
Posted on 11/24/08 at 10:04 pm to Icansee4miles
now having said that I think the case is still leaning in the 4 game suspension direction. The only thing I have seen about it was the day of the hearing and nothing since then
Posted on 11/24/08 at 10:06 pm to nino2469
but can you agree that if you were a green bay fan and your team was getting man handled, and a protest was in the air for players who possibly cheated, you would be angry with the NFL for allowing them to play.
Posted on 11/24/08 at 10:10 pm to The Eric
quote:
but can you agree that if you were a green bay fan and your team was getting man handled, and a protest was in the air for players who possibly cheated, you would be angry with the NFL for allowing them to play.
depends on the case.. not everything is the same situation.
the fact it was so many players from one team proves they felt the pills were okay. look at the size of deuce this year. he is smaller than EVER. he could use some performance pills if anything.
rodney harrison/shawn merrimean now those guys deserved suspensions.
Posted on 11/24/08 at 10:13 pm to Icansee4miles
quote:
i love the saints, and i want to win, but i dont understand the logic in letting players play when they tested positive for substances, even if they are protesting it... if they are a performance enhancer then its still not fair to the other team...
Go suck on your mamma's tit you pansy arse little bitch. You think nobody on Green Bay has taken some sort of substance? Besides, nothing was proven. It wasn't on the list of banned substances anyway.Posted on 11/24/08 at 10:16 pm to adavis
you act like your shite doesnt stink
Posted on 11/24/08 at 10:18 pm to The Eric
Did so Did not Did so 
Dude, get over yourself. Excuse me, I need to go piss again...
Dude, get over yourself. Excuse me, I need to go piss again...
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News