- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Number 2 seed might not be all that bad
Posted on 11/11/13 at 2:13 pm to ffhouston
Posted on 11/11/13 at 2:13 pm to ffhouston
quote:
Do you really thing Carolina is not going to make the playoffs over an Aaron Rodgers-less Packers team, just to pick one, or is this just a massive oversight on your part?
didnt realy think of carolina, so yes they are a wildcard threat as well. (so used to them being irrelevant) The point that i was making was that the 4 seed is so shitty this year that a wildcard team (which would be way better than the 4th seed) will be more likely to play seattle and they will have a better chance to beat them, giving us a chance at homefield NFC championship with the 2 seed. and i would rather play the 3rd seed than play a wildcard team that didnt get a top seed only because the way that playoff rules work (ex 2010 when we were a wildcard and we we played a higher seeded 7-9 seattle)
would you rather play the 3lions or the 5niners in the seccond round?
Posted on 11/11/13 at 2:33 pm to tigersint
quote:
Number 2 seed might not be all that bad
It is better that a #3 seed but not as good as a #1 seed.
I read a lot.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 4:01 pm to goatmilker
Let's just worry about the panthers first. Then we can talk seeding.
Popular
Back to top

0





