- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saints are a solid long-term destination for a new coach
Posted on 1/31/25 at 8:17 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/31/25 at 8:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How have we been doing the past 4 years?
quote:
You know, when you supported signing Carr
So we’ve had Carr for 4 years now??
fricking imbecile LOL.
Karens on the rampage.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 8:21 am to P bean
quote:
Arguing semantics,
Semantics or the literal quote?
quote:
Find HOF coach and sign HOF QB in FA
Explain the semantics there.
quote:
clearly the coach/qb combo cannnot be hall of famers until post career,
This is also irrelevant to the discussion. We can use hindsight bias to analyze how common it is, historically.
Acquiring a HOF HC and QB (even if we permit your dishonest pivot) is rare. It does not happen "all the time," as you said.
quote:
Which has absolutely nothing to do whether the Saints are an attractive job that K Moore wants to take.
Which has nothing to do with your absurdly incorrect point that this acquisition happens "all the time"
Your second attempt at pivoting from being incorrect is also noted.
quote:
But keep changing the subject
Your tone deaf irony is also noted.

Posted on 1/31/25 at 8:22 am to P bean
quote:
So we’ve had Carr for 4 years now??
We've had him for half of that time.
All the arguments made about why it was a bad decision (by people like me) were shown to be correct.
All the cope and shitty arguments about why it was a good decision (by people like you) were shown to be laughably incorrect.
Popular
Back to top

1





