Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Without Reggie Bush | Page 4 | Saints Talk
Started By
Message

re: Without Reggie Bush

Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:52 pm to
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
79769 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

who did we keep spreading out and calling plays for?


reggie had 2 rushes and 3 passes go his way in the first half...so yea, you dont know wtf youre talking about

its not like he was the focal point of the offense and thats why we struggled so bad

we struggled so bad because of penalties and terrible offensive line play

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471479 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

its not like he was the focal point of the offense and thats why we struggled so bad

bell had 0 rushes in the first half, right?
how many rushes did pierre have? couldn't have been many

quote:

we struggled so bad because of penalties and terrible offensive line play

bush was also somewhat responsible for being a horrible blocker on 3 sacks
Posted by DollaChoppa
I Simp for ACC
Member since May 2008
84774 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:54 pm to
plus he takes up space in the backfield and gets in his own teammates way
Posted by fightingtiger2335
heh?
Member since Aug 2007
61157 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

how many rushes did pierre have? couldn't have been many



Bush doesn't make the play calls...we couldn't establish the run the 1st half no matter who was running because our O-Line was getting blown up

Posted by s-man
Benton
Member since Jan 2005
1436 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:54 pm to
DBG sucks.
Posted by s-man
Benton
Member since Jan 2005
1436 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

Bush doesn't make the play calls...we couldn't establish the run the 1st half no matter who was running because our O-Line was getting blown up


Not true, we didn't even commit to the run.
Posted by fightingtiger2335
heh?
Member since Aug 2007
61157 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:56 pm to
What's not true? Bush makes the play calls? Or that our O line was steady just Bush screwed them?
Posted by Charles Bronson
WINNING CHAMPIONSHIPS
Member since Nov 2007
11677 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

SP loves to tinker with reggie. always has. when he relies on reggie as "the man," our offense sucks. always has
QFE.

Payton tries to be too unconventional with Bush (ex: the double reverse in the redzone). The offense is much better with Bush on the sideline.
Posted by thejudge
Westlake, LA
Member since Sep 2009
15132 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

IMO if you are anti Reggie you are anti Saints.


IMO your a fricking idiot...
Posted by el tigre
your heart
Member since Sep 2003
49712 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:56 pm to
quote:


we struggled so bad because of penalties and terrible offensive line play


and not using our power back (Bell) that perfectly compliments the passing game. he got zero carries in the first half. More Bell and less Bush is a good thing.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471479 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:56 pm to
by my count pierre had 4 carries

bush was targe ted more than pierre and bell COMBINED in the first half
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
79769 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:57 pm to
thomas had 3 carries in the first half

quote:

bush was also somewhat responsible for being a horrible blocker on 3 sacks


actually, just one...and thomas got owned by porter later in the game on an identical play
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471479 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

we couldn't establish the run the 1st half no matter who was running because our O-Line was getting blown up

pierre rushed 4 times for 20 yards in the first half

that's 5.0 ypc
Posted by el tigre
your heart
Member since Sep 2003
49712 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

we couldn't establish the run the 1st half no matter who was running because our O-Line was getting blown up


bullshite...it's b/c we were being cute, and not going with traditional power runs where Bell, and the line, can do very well.
Posted by thejudge
Westlake, LA
Member since Sep 2009
15132 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 8:00 pm to
quote:


without reggie we run the ball with bell/thomas to start and we never get in the hole


the freaking truth...

he is in there we feel we HAVE to get it to him and it screws up the rythm. they know were going to pass cause he can't run for shite. When we run the ball playaction is open and make for big plays in the passing game...

we started running the ball in the giants game and that sit went swimmingly.
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77512 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

IMO your a fricking idiot...


quote:

thejudge




OVER RULED!


Posted by s-man
Benton
Member since Jan 2005
1436 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 8:02 pm to
I vote Rondo is an idiot.
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
79769 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 8:02 pm to
bush actually averaged more per touch than thomas today, fwiw
Posted by fightingtiger2335
heh?
Member since Aug 2007
61157 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

he can't run for shite.


4 yard per carry is terrible...I agree.
Posted by thejudge
Westlake, LA
Member since Sep 2009
15132 posts
Posted on 10/25/09 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

quote:
IMO your a fricking idiot...



quote:
thejudge





OVER RULED!


overruled?

umm the name is from the GTO package that came out in '69...
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram