Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Another one... Pit Bull Kills 3-year-old | Page 11 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: Another one... Pit Bull Kills 3-year-old

Posted on 4/1/14 at 1:49 pm to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72798 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

There's another story of a sudden attack of a toddler in Texas yesterday by a pit bull. The mother took the child into the bathroom and called the police. It should be no surprise that the police were more than happy to shoot the dog.


Wouldn't you be "more than happy" to shoot a dog that had just tried to kill a 2 year old child?
Posted by ATXTiger1
Austin
Member since Feb 2009
3296 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

I never said my children are unsupervised around my dog.


I was agreeing with you and building off of your post.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84395 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 1:50 pm to
Oh. My apologies. Carry on.
Posted by PapiGogo
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since May 2012
382 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

or just maybe some people are responsible dog owners that get their dogs fixed, don't breed them to fight where they end up riddled with inbreeding, they socialize the dogs, they don't keep them on chains..... Just maybe some people take some responsibility for once. Maybe some people understand before getting the breed that there may need to be special precautions taken because of the strength of the dog and also because of the preconceived notions that some have about the dog.


I believe there is enough empirical and anecdotal evidence to prove that these dogs are prone to act independent of their ownership. They have a predisposition to attack, and physically are capable of causing great bodily harm (which is what separates them from the chihuahua).

Genetic predispositions are a strange thing. Water dogs swim. Retrieving dogs retrieve. Guard dogs guard. Fighting dogs fight. Most breeds display these characteristics when they're only weeks old. Nature is independent of ownership.

There is a reason we don't have Golden Retriever dog fighting rings (although that would probably be adorable with all of the tail wagging and licking).



This post was edited on 4/1/14 at 2:35 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72798 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

I believe there is enough empirical and anecdotal evidence to prove that these dogs are prone to act independent of their ownership. They have a predisposition to attack, and physically are capable of causing great bodily harm (which is what separates them from the chihuahua).

Genetic predispositions are a strange thing. Water dogs swim. Retrieving dogs retrieve. Guard dogs guard. Fighting dogs fight. Most breeds display these characteristics when they're only weeks old. Nature is independent of ownership.





No... only poor trashy pits attack the poor trashy kids and elderly people who breed them to fight.



Posted by 3rdRowTailgater
Tulsa
Member since Jul 2006
18860 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

I believe there is enough empirical and anecdotal evidence to prove that these dogs are prone to act independent of their ownership. They have a predisposition to attack,

Let's just ignore the ASPCA and American Veterinarian Medical Association who have actually done studies on the breed and found that pit bulls are not any more genetically predisposed or likely to attack than other breeds. Instead let's react to sensationalized news stories that usually only make headlines if the dog involved is a pit bull.
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
23576 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Instead let's react to sensationalized news stories that usually only make headlines if the dog involved is a pit bull.



And, there it is.
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61451 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

Let's just ignore the ASPCA and American Veterinarian Medical Association who have actually done studies on the breed and found that pit bulls are not any more genetically predisposed or likely to attack than other breeds. Instead let's react to sensationalized news stories that usually only make headlines if the dog involved is a pit bull.


I could see that as being true


But you have to admit that a pitbull attack =/= a golden retriever attack
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
23576 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

But you have to admit that a pitbull attack =/= a golden retriever attack



The pit bull attacks get reported because their attacks are more likely to kill than most others. Yes, I realize other dogs can kill too. But I'll take my chances against a golden retriever over a pit bull any day.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72798 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Let's just ignore the ASPCA and American Veterinarian Medical Association who have actually done studies on the breed and found that pit bulls are not any more genetically predisposed or likely to attack than other breeds. Instead let's react to sensationalized news stories that usually only make headlines if the dog involved is a pit bull.


So we should just ignore the fact that year after year Pits account for usually about 70% of all fatal dog attacks, far more than all other breeds combined, and usually the victims are small children? Gotcha.

Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61451 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 2:49 pm to
I'm not disagreeing


Which is why I am dumbfounded that people are willing to own potentially deadly animals, and raise kids around them
Posted by 3rdRowTailgater
Tulsa
Member since Jul 2006
18860 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

But you have to admit that a pitbull attack =/= a golden retriever attack


That's quite possibly true, but if trashy people started buying up goldens and treated them like shite and didn't properly care or train them we'd surely see an increase in golden attacks. This pit bull phenomenon didn't start until the mid to late 1990's. We've seen this before with Rottweilers, German Shepherds and Dobermans in the past.
Posted by 3rdRowTailgater
Tulsa
Member since Jul 2006
18860 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

So we should just ignore the fact that year after year Pits account for usually about 70% of all fatal dog attacks, far more than all other breeds combined, and usually the victims are small children? Gotcha.


Let's just outlaw all big dogs that could possibly cause harm to children.
Posted by ATXTiger1
Austin
Member since Feb 2009
3296 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

sensationalized news stories that usually only make headlines if the dog involved is a pit bull


LINK

Here is an article where a lab killed a woman. Notice how they say 'dog' in the headlines instead of listing the breed, and the breed is only mentioned at the end of the article. It was even reported as being a pit bull at first because the media just assumed it was a pit bull since it killed someone. I mean we all know labs and goldens are perfect dogs, right?
Posted by GEAUXmedic
Premium Member
Member since Nov 2011
42051 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

Let's just outlaw all big dogs that could possibly cause harm to children.



Why not. They already outlaw having big cats in your home.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72798 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Which is why I am dumbfounded that people are willing to own potentially deadly animals, and raise kids around them



Why stop of Pitbulls? I'm sure Hyenas make great family pets....



And they're great with kids....



Look a that cwuet wittle baby....
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72798 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

the media just assumed it was a pit bull since it killed someone.


Seeing how they are responsible for the vast majority of all fatal dog attacks, I can understand how they jumped to that conclusion.
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
23576 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 3:02 pm to
quote:


Let's just outlaw all big dogs that could possibly cause harm to children.


It is my belief that over the years and years of pet ownership, there is an understanding of what breeds have aggressive tendencies. They are trouble. These, along with pits, shouldn't be in households with children. You, I, or anyone, cannot pretend that a nip/bite from a smaller, less aggressive dog, is the same as a mauling. I understand you love your dog, you love the breed, and your belief is such. But it is blind ignorance to believe these bigger, aggressive dogs aren't a huge problem and aren't more deadly.
This post was edited on 4/1/14 at 3:04 pm
Posted by Ole War Skule
North Shore
Member since Sep 2003
3409 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 3:05 pm to
anyone who cannot plainly see that the breed was been to be violent and is extremely dangerous is frankly an idiot...yes, even some pit bulls can be raised to be a gentle dog, but it is coded in their genetics to attack and kill..how anyone bothers to argue that indisputable fact must be a genetic creation of Isuzu Joe and Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf..
Posted by ATXTiger1
Austin
Member since Feb 2009
3296 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

it is coded in their genetics to attack and kill


Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram