- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/16/25 at 7:49 am to DesScorp
I don’t really care about what others read, as long as it doesn’t lead to harm of others.
The End.
The End.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 7:51 am to notsince98
quote:
By the very definition, these books are porn. There is no gray area here.
Sure, but they aren't the same. This is someone's fiction come to life through paper. No humans are involved in the making other than the person writing it and editing it.
That's not the same thing as two people actually having sex on camera.
This is weird, but it does no harm to anyone. To say it does harm is to say that any sick thought that you've ever spilled into the ether is harmful. I'd hate for you to be a hypocrite here.
This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 7:53 am
Posted on 10/16/25 at 7:53 am to Odysseus32
quote:
Not endorsing the book, but that argument doesn't hold weight. Porn involves real people sometimes being heavily incentivized to degrade themselves for money. It's degrading because a lot of the women in porn are from rough upbringings or bad homes, abused, etc. and feel they have no other option.
Ok, but that's more of a them problem. If you're jacking off to beastiality fantasy and toon porn, that's more of a you problem.
I stay away from all of it, but you're splitting hairs a bit.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 7:54 am to GRTiger
quote:
I stay away from all of it, but you're splitting hairs a bit.
I couldn't disagree more.
There's no harm in indulging in fantasy when it doesn't involve anyone else. When your fantasy involves someone else having to physically perform it, that's a lot different than reading words.
I can't believe I'm even having this debate to be honest.
This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 7:55 am
Posted on 10/16/25 at 7:56 am to notsince98
quote:
ShoeOnHead is great. I love her stuff.
At least to me she’s cute as frick. Especially when she puts on the glasses.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 7:56 am to Odysseus32
You're bypassing some pretty significant issues in living out certain fantasies.
Let's just say I wouldn't look at my wife the same if I knew she pleasured herself to the idea lf sucking bull dick.
Let's just say I wouldn't look at my wife the same if I knew she pleasured herself to the idea lf sucking bull dick.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 7:57 am to wallowinit
quote:
bleeping the word “sex
demonetization from youtube AI scanning the dialog.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 7:58 am to DesScorp
Killing babies and fricking livestock. Liberal white women....
Posted on 10/16/25 at 7:58 am to Odysseus32
quote:
Sure, but they aren't the same. This is someone's fiction come to life through paper. No humans are involved in the making other than the person writing it and editing it.
That's not the same thing as two people actually having sex on camera.
This is weird, but it does no harm to anyone. To say it does harm is to say that any sick thought that you've ever spilled into the ether is harmful. I'd hate for you to be a hypocrite here.
You are really reaching out to parse things here. First define harm and who is experiencing it because there is harm from participants that is not present when it is "consenting adults" and there is harm for those who watch it. If you start getting into the harm of those who watch it, that same harm does happen to women who read porn. The male and female brains are different and reading does to women what watching does to guys. So from the consumer standpoint, the women here are every bit as bad as the men.
If you want to get into the human trafficking side of things, that is a whole different conversation.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:00 am to Odysseus32
quote:
Sure, but they aren't the same. This is someone's fiction come to life through paper. No humans are involved in the making other than the person writing it and editing it.
That's not the same thing as two people actually having sex on camera.
This is weird, but it does no harm to anyone. To say it does harm is to say that any sick thought that you've ever spilled into the ether is harmful. I'd hate for you to be a hypocrite here.
I think he originally just meant that porn and these books are both types of fantasy. You're getting into the weeds of how they are made...obviously writing words onto paper and filming people having sex aren't the same thing, but the end result is fairly similar.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:00 am to GRTiger
quote:
Let's just say I wouldn't look at my wife the same if I knew she pleasured herself to the idea lf sucking bull dick.
I think that's kind of shitty.
We all have had thoughts that are disgusting to someone else, even in fleeting moments. Some more than others. I've never had thoughts like the ones portrayed in this book, but I've had lewd thoughts about women, and I've had hateful urges. I've had thoughts that where if someone were to see them they would likely think less of me.
To love and marry someone is to love them without judgement of their human characteristics. I'm sure my wife has had thoughts she's ashamed of. If she told me, I wouldn't judge her for it. She isn't harming anyone.
I'm sad that you can't understand that.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:01 am to Odysseus32
quote:
I think that's kind of shitty.
I don't care. I married someone who would agree with me, so it's moot. This post was edited on 10/16/25 at 8:02 am
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:02 am to northshorebamaman
quote:
Milking Farm by CS Nascosta, huh. Awful. Where can you even purchase that garbage from online? I bet they even offer discrete packaging and nondescript billing so these perverts don't get outed too. Can anyone confirm?
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:02 am to GRTiger
quote:
I don't care. I married someone who would agree me me, so it's moot.
Good on you I suppose
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:02 am to Odysseus32
quote:
I think that's kind of shitty.
So is the "literature" in the OP.
Yes, its ok to judge women who read that trashy shite.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:04 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Yes, its ok to judge women who read that trashy shite.
Yeah it's okay. Of course, you can do as you please.
What I'm saying is that it's hypocritical and small-minded.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:06 am to DesScorp
Udderly disgusting
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:06 am to Odysseus32
quote:
What I'm saying is that it's hypocritical and small-minded.
You like women who fantasize about sex with 12 year olds? After all, its just a thought.
Is it small minded to criticize them?
Youre simply so accepting of basic bitches that you have no standards left.
Posted on 10/16/25 at 8:08 am to BOSCEAUX
quote:
At least to me she’s cute as frick.
Understatement of the year for me.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News