- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Plane over Airline and Siegen
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:14 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:14 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
quote:Thanks, I'm trying to be a good person but it is frustrating dealing with so many people who are in denial.
I know yoga. It's all good.
I'm not mad or upset, not even with gray who sometimes is mean to me, but he'll debate me and does a good job of debating even when I think deep down he knows I'm right.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:14 pm to yoga girl
quote:
and since the military CARGO plane is not showing up on radar, it is doing something sketchy
And how do you know it's not showing up on radar? frick, now I'm involved.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:15 pm to yoga girl
It's a C130 doing touch and go's at BR airport. Was doing it yesterday as well.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:16 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
because flightaware and other sites put out their information based on radar......
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:17 pm to Deactived
quote:
because flightaware and other sites put out their information based on radar......
I'm no expert, and probably stand corrected, but I was under the impression that this was strictly based off flight logs.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:17 pm to Deactived
Flightaware uses squelches from transponders to locate aircraft. Military aircraft do not squelch on a public frequency hence not showing up on flightaware.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:18 pm to Deactived
quote:
because flightaware and other sites put out their information based on radar......
On point ... case closed.
And for the "touch and go" poster - they don't circle around aimlessly doing touch and go's. Yes, it may be a broad circle many miles long, but not tight "circles over the city" as the posts said.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:18 pm to yoga girl
quote:
Damn, let me explain something about radar. The radar doesn't say "ok, we'll pick up only civilian planes." It picks up ALL planes, and since the military CARGO plane is not showing up on radar, it is doing something sketchy. Why hide?
Experimenting with some cloaking device? EMF interference to the radar site? Lots of possibilities, all reasonable theories.
The websites he's referring to don't show actual radar, they're animated tracking maps. That plane has a radar signature simply by its physical shape. ATC in BR is tracking it so other planes don't hit it. The military has never allowed civilians to track their flights...ever.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:18 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
Based off of documented flight plans with the tower.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:19 pm to yoga girl
quote:
major city.
quote:
Baton Rouge
Something isn't adding up
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:20 pm to yoga girl
quote:
On point ... case closed.
And for the "touch and go" poster - they don't circle around aimlessly doing touch and go's. Yes, it may be a broad circle many miles long, but not tight "circles over the city" as the posts said.
It's not aimless. It's part of a training exercise. Just like the flights I described near me.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:20 pm to meauxjeaux2
quote:
Flightaware uses squelches from transponders to locate aircraft. Military aircraft do not squelch on a public frequency hence not showing up on flightaware.
BINGO.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:21 pm to yoga girl
Crazy arse lady. I'm at the airport and it has been doing touch and go's since yesterday. Who gives a shite if it's out doing circles away from the airport. Military does maneuver practice all the time away from airports. He more than likely got vectored out there because of incoming or outgoing commercial traffic.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:21 pm to upgrayedd
The websites he's referring to don't show actual radar, they're animated tracking maps. That plane has a radar signature simply by its physical shape. ATC in BR is tracking it so other planes don't hit it. The military has never allowed civilians to track their flights...ever.
Exactly. If you have an offshore boat with radar you could probably pick it up
Exactly. If you have an offshore boat with radar you could probably pick it up
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:21 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
The websites he's referring to don't show actual radar, they're animated tracking maps. That plane has a radar signature simply by its physical shape. ATC in BR is tracking it so other planes don't hit it. The military has never allowed civilians to track their flights...ever.
Military planes do not disappear from radar over civillian areas or they aren't supposed to FACT.
There would be collisions midair.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:22 pm to yoga girl
We are saying it shows up on a radar. Just not Flightaware, which isn't radar
This post was edited on 11/11/16 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:23 pm to meauxjeaux2
quote:
Crazy arse lady. I'm at the airport and it has been doing touch and go's since yesterday. Who gives a shite if it's out doing circles away from the airport. Military does maneuver practice all the time away from airports. He more than likely got vectored out there because of incoming or outgoing commercial traffic.
I'll assume you are telling the truth. Did you ever think the touch and go's could be a false flag? A diversion? Because it doesn't explain circling around over the city.
Posted on 11/11/16 at 1:23 pm to yoga girl
When are you going to realize that you're not looking at a real radar when you're looking at flightaware? If you went to the tower you would see real radar.
Popular
Back to top



1




