- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/18/20 at 10:35 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
I don’t have a side bro but the hypocrisy is astounding 
Posted on 9/18/20 at 10:37 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Or I’m just paying attention
PA has tightened a bit, which is probably Biden’s most important state to win as of now. FL is probably going red, which is a must win for Trump.
The other key states have Biden doing pretty damn good.
I don't see that Trump has lost any significant amount of supporters. Even if he has lost some, he has still gained more former democrat supporters that have gotten fed up with the new hard left turn.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 10:42 pm to whoa
quote:
Which is complete and utter horseshite.
We will not vote until after the election part 1
We will not vote part 2
The way it works is the executive has a constitutional duty to nominate a person to fill federal judicial vacancies. Each nominee is subject to advice and consent of the senate.
When Obama nominated Merrick Garland Obama fulfilled his constitutional duty.
McConnell responded with his constitutional duty and advised against it. Merrick Garland simply did not have the votes.
Now with the current vacancy Trump has a constitutional duty to nominate a replacement.
McConnell then has a constitutional duty to provide consent or not.
The constitutional top line is really not that complicated. However it gets slightly more complicated when the senate parliamentary procedures are introduced. But thanks to Harry Reid changing senate rules right before his retirement senate parliamentary procedures have become very simple. The nominee just needs a simple majority or 50 +VP to consent to an executive nominee.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 10:44 pm to munchman
quote:
Bet old Harry Reid is rolling over in his grave.
Harry Reid is still alive. He's 80.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 10:44 pm to whoa
quote:
I don’t have a side bro but the hypocrisy is astounding
There is no hypocrisy if you know the law.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 10:46 pm to GumboPot
Oh ok
Posted on 9/18/20 at 10:48 pm to whoa
quote:
I don’t have a side bro but the hypocrisy is astounding
what’s the altitude like floating so high above the fray?
Posted on 9/18/20 at 10:48 pm to munchman
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/31/21 at 9:11 am
Posted on 9/18/20 at 10:49 pm to whoa
quote:
Oh ok
You think Merrick Garland would have had the votes to get confirmed by at Republican senate?
The answer is a obvious no.
Schummer and a Democrat senate would have done the same exact thing to a Republican president.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 10:50 pm to whoa
You’re a clown, bro.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 10:50 pm to djangochained
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/31/21 at 9:11 am
Posted on 9/18/20 at 10:51 pm to Chuck Barris
quote:
You mean like blocking a vote on a Supreme Court nominee because it's a presidential election year and then openly stating that you won't apply the same standard when the president is a member of your own party?
Again, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate. It wasn't going to get done no matter what. You've bought the media narrative there was some sort of "special agreement" . An utterly laughable characterization knowing the true nature of the democratic party.
If the Democrats had the majority Merrick Garland would be on the supreme court.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 10:52 pm to whoa
quote:
Oh ok
Not sure what you’re laughing at. You’re wrong.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 10:54 pm to Sao
quote:
With 237 days left in a Presidency no less lol.
McConnell. True Patriotism.
McConnell gave the dems a chance to win back the Senate. Garland would not have been put on the SC had a vote occurred prior to the election. Anyone who acts like the Democrats voluntarily refrained from putting their guy- on the bench is being ignorant. Learn the facts.
This post was edited on 9/18/20 at 10:54 pm
Posted on 9/18/20 at 10:55 pm to GumboPot
quote:
There is no hypocrisy if you know the law.
Spineless 2020
Posted on 9/18/20 at 11:03 pm to HogWalloper
quote:
frick that bitch.
Very Christian of you
Posted on 9/18/20 at 11:05 pm to REG861
The left is pathetic.
What a comeback you fricking loser
What a comeback you fricking loser
Posted on 9/18/20 at 11:07 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
Mountain douch. Bring some substance to a thread for once.
Posted on 9/18/20 at 11:08 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
Just when you thought this election couldn't get any more polarized...
Just when you thought TD couldn't get any more polarizing.
Page 15 of 28
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News