- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2 km deep cylindrical shock pillars found below pyramids
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:53 pm to Crimson Wraith
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:53 pm to Crimson Wraith
quote:
what is in Antarctica?
Just penguins. Nothing to see there.
And then there's Admiral Byrd's testimony that there lies 5,000,000 square miles of wealth, including boundless mineral deposits. (And just maybe, a bunch of hidden fortresses, underground cities, ancient pyramids and buildings, surprising greenery and lakes, and just a few old German settlements and military bases.)
0
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:58 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
What are you talking about? The Russians have claimed to have dug a hole 8 miles deep.
Oh, you're just a troll.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 4:07 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
Pathetic.
Oh, you really think the Russians dug down 8 miles 4,000 years ago?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 4:13 pm to Azkiger
YOU:
Did you mean antiquities OR "throughout history"?
The Russian 8 mile hole is also "history."
quote:
We can look throughout human history, see what's the furthest we can see that humans have dug down into the ground, see that it's not even close to whatever is being claimed with this pyramid story...
Did you mean antiquities OR "throughout history"?
The Russian 8 mile hole is also "history."
Posted on 3/24/25 at 4:14 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
“If you want to know the secrets of the Universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.“
Holy shite, that's String Theory in a nutshell.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 4:27 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
Oh, you're one of those Evo-3.5 billion year old earth-ers, huh?
It's 4.5. And backed up by science. But you don't want to hear that.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 4:36 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
It's 4.5. And backed up by science.
quote:
But you don't want to hear that.
Sure, I'd LOVE to hear it.
Tell me how "Science" factually backs this thesis up.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 4:41 pm to EphesianArmor
Zircon dating, a radiometric dating technique, determines the age of rocks by analyzing the uranium-lead decay within zircon crystals, which naturally incorporate uranium but reject lead during their formation.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Zircon's Unique Properties:
Zircon crystals are known for their ability to incorporate uranium but not lead during their formation. This makes them ideal for radiometric dating because any lead found within a zircon crystal must have originated from the radioactive decay of uranium.
Radioactive Decay:
Uranium, like other radioactive elements, decays at a known, consistent rate, transforming into lead over time.
Measuring Uranium and Lead:
Scientists measure the amount of uranium and lead present in a zircon crystal using mass spectrometry.
Calculating Age:
By comparing the ratio of uranium to lead, scientists can calculate how long the uranium has been decaying, and therefore determine the age of the zircon crystal and, by extension, the rock it was part of.
Oh you know. Just science.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Zircon's Unique Properties:
Zircon crystals are known for their ability to incorporate uranium but not lead during their formation. This makes them ideal for radiometric dating because any lead found within a zircon crystal must have originated from the radioactive decay of uranium.
Radioactive Decay:
Uranium, like other radioactive elements, decays at a known, consistent rate, transforming into lead over time.
Measuring Uranium and Lead:
Scientists measure the amount of uranium and lead present in a zircon crystal using mass spectrometry.
Calculating Age:
By comparing the ratio of uranium to lead, scientists can calculate how long the uranium has been decaying, and therefore determine the age of the zircon crystal and, by extension, the rock it was part of.
Oh you know. Just science.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 4:59 pm to BayouBlitz
Obsolete and in-applicable and not provable.
Zircon cannot even be proven to exist pre-Flood.
"Fundamental Assumption" in Zircon Dating Called into Question"
(Radioactive Decay) Was Uranium existing re-Flood? We don't know. IF it has existed, the Radiometric Dating have falsely assumed rates are constant.
In other words, in either case, the pre-Flood world oxygen levels, barometric pressure and rates of decay were actually much different. Ergo, the rates of "decay" don't even apply. Not only that, life was silicon-cased rather than carbon-based.
"Science" can't prove ANY "dating" methodology works other than (ironically) "Carbon-Dating." "The Science" keeps on wish-casting their way into oblivion -- whether the age of the earth, universe, "evolution", dating methodology, archaeology, geology, virology -- you name it.
"SCIENTISM is a Religion.
Is this world, this earth 4.5 BILLION years old? It's not even 4.5 million years old. Not close and there is no evidence -- just more "scientific" theories.
Zircon cannot even be proven to exist pre-Flood.
"Fundamental Assumption" in Zircon Dating Called into Question"
(Radioactive Decay) Was Uranium existing re-Flood? We don't know. IF it has existed, the Radiometric Dating have falsely assumed rates are constant.
In other words, in either case, the pre-Flood world oxygen levels, barometric pressure and rates of decay were actually much different. Ergo, the rates of "decay" don't even apply. Not only that, life was silicon-cased rather than carbon-based.
"Science" can't prove ANY "dating" methodology works other than (ironically) "Carbon-Dating." "The Science" keeps on wish-casting their way into oblivion -- whether the age of the earth, universe, "evolution", dating methodology, archaeology, geology, virology -- you name it.
"SCIENTISM is a Religion.
Is this world, this earth 4.5 BILLION years old? It's not even 4.5 million years old. Not close and there is no evidence -- just more "scientific" theories.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 5:22 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
Zircon cannot even be proven to exist pre-Flood.
You are absolutely correct.
...but only because there was no "Flood".
Posted on 3/24/25 at 5:41 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
Was Uranium existing re-Flood? We don't know. IF it has existed, the Radiometric Dating have falsely assumed rates are constant.
Lol. What? The flood that has not one scientific artifact?
quote:
rates of decay were actually much different.
Lol. What??? That makes no sense.
Nevermind. I'm not wasting any more time with you.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 5:47 pm to Harry Boutte
quote:
there was no "Flood".
What about all those sea shells found at the top of Mt Everest?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 5:55 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
What about all those sea shells found at the top of Mt Everest?
Mt. Everest wasn't always that tall.
But sure, 6k years ago a flood covered the entire planet. The water came from outer space and just disappeared.
I still want to hear how decay suddenly changed.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 5:59 pm to BayouBlitz
(rates of decay were actually much different.)
Well, if you disbelieve the Noah's Flood account but rely on regurgitated lessons from teachers along with Wiki for "science" then no amount of new data, evidence and logic to the contrary will make sense.
You've cited two dating methodologies as your "proof" of a 4.5 billion year old earth (Zircon and Radiological.) Those are "scientific" theories that aren't close to proven and never were. I'm just the messenger.
What IF the Noah's Flood account is real?
Have it your way, but, maybe a good idea not to take "Science" at their word about anything (esp since Covid and the bio-weapon shot that was NOT a "vax" as "The Science" swore.)
quote:
Lol. What??? That makes no sense.
Well, if you disbelieve the Noah's Flood account but rely on regurgitated lessons from teachers along with Wiki for "science" then no amount of new data, evidence and logic to the contrary will make sense.
You've cited two dating methodologies as your "proof" of a 4.5 billion year old earth (Zircon and Radiological.) Those are "scientific" theories that aren't close to proven and never were. I'm just the messenger.
What IF the Noah's Flood account is real?
quote:
I'm not wasting any more time with you.
Have it your way, but, maybe a good idea not to take "Science" at their word about anything (esp since Covid and the bio-weapon shot that was NOT a "vax" as "The Science" swore.)
Posted on 3/24/25 at 6:03 pm to BayouBlitz
There was a great flood. 12-15K ago maybe?
Anyway what can one say. It's not static and never will be. There is a frozen in time green continent at the SP. Anything is possible.
Anyway what can one say. It's not static and never will be. There is a frozen in time green continent at the SP. Anything is possible.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 6:11 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
Mt. Everest wasn't always that tall.
How tall was it originally? (SEA level?) Then just how did it rise almost 6 miles in the air?
quote:
But sure, 6k years ago a flood covered the entire planet. The water came from outer space and just disappeared.
You're half right.
Some of it poured through the "Gates of Heaven"; the rest from "the Great Founts of the Deep." (Below us -- even beneath the seas themselves still lie great oceans. "Science" hasn't taught us that either.) Both Flood facilitators are described in Genesis if you're interested.
quote:
I still want to hear how decay suddenly changed.
Via Divine fiat and prerogative the "Laws of Physics" changed drastically. By Divine Fiat the earth was created, and everything else.
Why does "The Science" and their church members always believe they are entitled to know how the great mysteries and secrets of God work? (The First Book of Enoch reveals some cool stuff btw.)
Posted on 3/24/25 at 6:32 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
They why bother disregarding ANY theory at all?
Building it before the flood is a moronic theory
This post was edited on 3/25/25 at 8:56 am
Posted on 3/24/25 at 6:50 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
Via Divine fiat and prerogative the "Laws of Physics" changed drastically. By Divine Fiat the earth was created, and everything else.
Annd there it is.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:08 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
Did you mean antiquities OR "throughout history"?
The Russian 8 mile hole is also "history."
What do you think is best for this comparison?
Page 17 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News