Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us All the talk on Roe V. Wade | Page 12 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: All the talk on Roe V. Wade

Posted on 7/16/18 at 11:45 am to
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 11:45 am to
quote:

We are discussing a legal standard and I am positing that deviation from a scientific basis for this standard would necessarily be arbitrary.


Wrong.

quote:

Our DNA sequence is what makes us individual and unique.


That is what I replied to. Then you jumped in. If you want to alter the discussion, you need to be more clear when making your points.

quote:

When, in your opinion, does personhood get bestowed and why?


Between conception and birth. It isn't a simple answer and would be best served by a separate discussion.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Dems are just trying to fire up their base.


Correct, and the emotionally charged pushback makes their job even easier.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
46302 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Roe v Wade isn’t going anywhere. No chance.
Possibly but the possibility of it being overturned is greater now than it has been in a long time.

quote:

Even if it did abortion would still be legal in like 48 states.
That would be an improvement. Also, it would allow other states to limit abortions further, ultimately (hopefully) lowering the overall number of legal abortions performed.
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Between conception and birth. It isn't a simple answer and would be best served by a separate discussion.



You clearly haven't read the rest of the thread and I have no interest in leading you by the nose through a 10 page discussion.

ETA: In fact your response to the quote you started with directly opens the conversation to the question of personhood:

quote:

OK, but your DNA sequence doesn't make you a person.


honestly at this point you're just ducking the issue and we can only speculate as to why
This post was edited on 7/16/18 at 11:56 am
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

You clearly haven't read the rest of the thread


I have, but that isn't relevant. You jumped in the middle of a separate conversation. When I answered your questions, you fell back to juvenile behavior because I hurt your feelings.

quote:

In fact your response to the quote you started with directly opens the conversation to the question of personhood


Dude, stay on track here. Your complaint was that you were trying to discuss things from a legal viewpoint. I pointed something out for you. fricking pay attention...
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

honestly at this point you're just ducking the issue and we can only speculate as to why


I'm simply not allowing you to drive the discussion, especially when you act like a child when you don't get your way.
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

I have, but that isn't relevant.


this doesn't speak highly of your reading comprehension.

quote:

Dude, stay on track here


I am definitely not the one having difficulty following the conversation.

"The question of personhood would be better served in a separate conversation, also I have read the entire thread"

Like I said, I have no interest in leading you by the nose through a 10 page thread. When you're all caught up, my positions are out there for you to refute if you wish. I won't be holding my breath.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

I am definitely not the one having difficulty following the conversation.


Yes, you are. I don't have time right now, but if you ask politely, I'm more than happy to clarify everything that happened for you later.

quote:

When you're all caught up, my positions are out there for you to refute if you wish. 


I don't care about your positions right now. That should be apparent since I never asked about them. We're still working on helping you understand the discussion. If you can't follow something this simple, I have no interest in your positions on anything.
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 12:18 pm to
your replies have been one long string of "I know you are, but what am I"

weak

You mentioned earlier that I "would not enjoy" engaging in a conversation with you. So far that's the only correct thing you've said in this thread.
This post was edited on 7/16/18 at 12:19 pm
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
46302 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 12:21 pm to
Don't waste your energy. There are others here who are willing to have a discussion about the substance of the issue.

I'll be happy when RvW gets overturned and the states can take a more active role in limiting the massacre that happens in this country on a daily basis.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 12:22 pm to
When you are unable to follow a conversation or admit that you are wrong, this is exactly what you'll get.

Next time you jump in to something, figure out what's going on first.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
26110 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

I got a question for anyone. How do I react to a female that had no qualms about telling me she had an abortion and seemed a little proud of the fact and then about a year or so later she was seeking sympathy for a miscarriage?


Since this person obviously has some emotional connection to you, you react with compassion and sympathy. Share the gospel with her.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
46302 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Since this person obviously has some emotional connection to you, you react with compassion and sympathy. Share the gospel with her.
This is the correct answer.
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 12:53 pm to
This is your first post in the thread:

quote:

your DNA sequence doesn't make you a person.


At this point the question of personhood was well trod already, so I have no idea how you got the impression that it would be off-topic. Furthermore you comically accuse me of attempting to direct the conversation. You brought up the question of personhood with your very first post in this thread! ... regardless within 5 or 6 posts, you were ready to pull the ripcord:

quote:

quote:

When, in your opinion, does personhood get bestowed and why?
Between conception and birth. It isn't a simple answer and would be best served by a separate discussion.


Honestly man, your shtick is weak, be better.

I mean ffs:

quote:

Just for the sake of understanding, what is your definition of personhood?


quote:

According to google: the quality or condition of being an individual person. That was precisely my point. Our DNA sequence is what makes us individual and unique.


Buckeye:
quote:

but your DNA sequence doesn't make you a person.


quote:

It makes you human, and that's the same thing, isn't it?


quote:

quote:

When, in your opinion, does personhood get bestowed and why?
Buckeye:Between conception and birth. It isn't a simple answer and would be best served by a separate discussion.


Buckeye:
quote:

I'm simply not allowing you to drive the discussion, especially when you act like a child when you don't get your way.


This post was edited on 7/16/18 at 1:05 pm
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

This is your first post in the thread


Good work. Now take a look at the post that I replied to, and work your way through the conversation you decided to join. I'm here if it gets confusing.

Everything you posted after that is irrelevant.
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Now take a look at the post that I replied to, and work your way through the conversation you decided to join. I'm here if it gets confusing.


Yep already did that, in fact I edited my post to include the entire string of quotes leading up to your first post. Maybe you would like to read the thread and stop showing your arse now?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Yep already did that


No you didn't. You couldn't even get the replies in the right order.

Like I said, ask questions if you you need to.
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 1:09 pm to
Are you serious clark?

Do you not know how to follow replies on TD?

I did skip out the bickering between us, but everything is in the correct order, starting at "ffs:"
This post was edited on 7/16/18 at 1:11 pm
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

Do you not know how to follow replies on TD?


Obviously. I can help you with that as well.
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 7/16/18 at 1:11 pm to
which ones are out of order
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram