Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Blackrock takes the lead for Fed Chair | Page 2 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Blackrock takes the lead for Fed Chair

Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:14 am to
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
96420 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:14 am to
Why dont you tell us?
Posted by CrazyCadillac
Member since Oct 2011
2112 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:15 am to
Another terrible pick by Trump. Shocker
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
96420 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:16 am to
Why is it terrible and he hasnt been picked yet
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
12867 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:16 am to
quote:

chief investment officer for global fixed income


=\=

quote:

chief investment officer for global fixed income


He very well may be a globalist, but just because he works for the firm does not make him a puppet for the firm. How many in here work for companies whose politics they completely agree with? Bueller?

Part of being an economist is understanding how policy will shift things like yield curves and inflation, and adjusting the portfolio to it. It has nothing to do with policy beliefs or policy decisions
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471822 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:18 am to
quote:

Why dont you tell us?

I'm not the one who tried to minimize his point by posting a bad stat, friend.

I'm explaining why your response was logically and rhetorically insufficient, and I gave you advice on how to be more productive and direct.

I don't personally care about that, but Trump has come out against it

quote:

Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Stops Wall Street from Competing with Main Street Homebuyers


quote:

Today, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order to protect the American Dream by making sure that large institutional investors do not buy single-family homes that could otherwise be purchased by families.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
96420 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:19 am to
Yeah I figured

Just sit this one out
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471822 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:21 am to
Naw if you make more bad arguments and I see it, I'll point them out so the people who don't like this move can make you make an honest point.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
96420 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:24 am to
You cant even tell us what is bad about my argument and cant explain why the pick would be bad

Its just more TDS from you. So its better for you to sit this one out
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
156777 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:26 am to
quote:

Naw if you make more bad arguments


You consider any of that an actual argument?

That’s beyond generous. What argument did she present?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471822 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:32 am to
quote:

You consider any of that an actual argument?

Well he did use a number so it was close, at least.

But, as I showed, it was dishonest and misleading.

quote:

What argument did she present?

Tried to dishonestly describe the impact on SFH by saying they make up only "3% of all transactions"

Using barely relevant framing to make the number smaller is the dishonesty.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471822 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:34 am to
quote:

You cant even tell us what is bad about my argument


You couldn't figure it out based on this?

quote:

What is their % of corporate building/buying? Clearly including their subsidiaries as well.


quote:

and cant explain why the pick would be bad

I didn't even make a comment, here. Again, stop being dishonest (making stuff up)

quote:

Its just more TDS from you

My only reference to Trump ITT was posting content from whitehouse.gov
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
96420 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:34 am to
quote:

But, as I showed, it was dishonest and misleading.



How is you post trump.wanting to ban them from buying SFRs mean the facts are misleading

What is the percentage?

And why would Reider be a bad pick?

quote:

Classification Scheme for Institutionally Owned Single-
Family Holdings
Our analysis is based on data from a national property records database. Because institutional owners
often use multiple legal entities as the named owner of the property, we have aggregated all legal
entities of the parent company. As of June 2022, we estimate that large institutional investors own
roughly 574,000 single-family homes. We have defined an institutional investor as an entity that owns
at least 100 single-family homes. To put this in perspective, there are 15.1 million one-unit rental
properties nationwide.
1 This would suggest that the total institutional ownership share is 3.8 percent;
the vast majority of owners in the SFR market are small and medium investors who own less than 100
properties. There are 46.6 million total rental properties, so one-unit properties make up 32.4 percent
of the total rental stock.


You were right its 3.8% i was wrong
This post was edited on 1/27/26 at 7:40 am
Posted by KLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2003
11080 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Blackrock takes the lead for Fed Chair


If this happens I will question everything I thought I knew and liked about Trump..
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
96420 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:48 am to
Why would he be a bad hire?

Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
14809 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Yeah, the guy who helped create that problem by mass buying housing as investment and turning family residence into rentals is going to fix the housing problem?

Foxes are excellent guards for a henhouse too, apparently.


Black Rock doesn't own residential real estate.

It's Blackstone that does.
Posted by KLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2003
11080 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 8:02 am to
Just what America needs the CIO of Blackrock with that job in this administration.


Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
96420 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 8:11 am to
So you cant explain why its a bad hire

Got it
Posted by theCrusher
Slidell
Member since Nov 2007
1674 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 8:49 am to
This would be stupid. Paulson protected Goldman during the financial collapse.

Reider would do the same thing for Blackrock.
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
11574 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Why would he be a bad hire?


I'm sure you were just fine with Powell as well until you weren't. You will praise anyone Trump hires until Trump turns on them and then like a parrot you act like you never agreed with the hire. Trump has a track record of absolutely awful hires/appointments going all the way back to his first term.

You have TWS perhaps the worst case of it on here.
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
19842 posts
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:09 am to
quote:

If you can explain how its a disaster im all ears

I doubt you will provide a coherent answer


I'll take a shot at Blackrock in general:

“Too big to fail” but not regulated like a bank
BlackRock acts like an unelected financial arm of governments.
Helping cause—or profit from—2008 financial crises
Role in housing crisis
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram