- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking : Trump will sign bill, declare National Emergency
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:30 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:30 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
he cant spin it as a win. this board is a good test of his base and this board hates the bill.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:30 pm to DallasTiger11
quote:
The best part is that in his obsession to look apolitical he has made the court even more political. You are a hack if you are changing your views on the constitution based on politics or the court make up. The fact that he has started to regularly join the liberals in decisions since Kennedy retired doesn’t make him noble. It makes him a fraud.
We really need RBG to drop dead soon we can make Roberts irrelevant. He cannot be trusted to do the right thing.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:30 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/24/20 at 9:01 pm
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:30 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I do. I really don’t want President AOC or President Warren or President Dem to have this power to subvert Congress.
Are they getting elected president largely on the issue upon which you have them declaring a national emergency?
When AOC gets elected President on proposing implementation of the Green New Deal, we have much bigger problems than her potential to declare "National Emergencies."
This post was edited on 2/14/19 at 2:31 pm
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:31 pm to Jbird
quote:Trump said I can call it whatever I want.
Or a barrier Chuckie.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:31 pm to JuiceTerry
Don't you get it, he got exactly what he wanted. He got the funds to continue building the wall until the court process ends up at the USSC, where he will win and have the authority to build the rest of the wall without Congressional approval, and he doesn't have to shut down the government to do it.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:31 pm to mmcgrath
quote:Yep.
Trump said I can call it whatever I want.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:31 pm to JuiceTerry
I'd say boom, but this is a precedent that is scary to think about if a Democratic President chooses to exercise it.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:32 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
JuiceTerry
Other than because “muh trumps wants it” which is the main reason, why are you against border security?
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:33 pm to JuiceTerry
Could someone explain to me why Mo Brooks plan is not an option?
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:33 pm to DallasTiger11
quote:
It’s interesting that Mitch is supporting the emergency. Just a few days ago he was warning against it.
Because republicans making attempts to override Trump vetoing the resolution canceling the emergency is a stupid ploy that has no hope of succeeding and will only cause party infighting.
He has a responsibility as party leader and majority leader to crack the whip and prevent a futile exercise.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:33 pm to BeeFense5
Quit trying to derail the thread with your dumb shite
All I did was link a story
Thx
All I did was link a story
Thx
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:33 pm to BeeFense5
quote:Because illegal border crossings are at a 45 year low, there is no emergency, and what we are currently doing is working
Other than because “muh trumps wants it” which is the main reason, why are you against border security?
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:34 pm to Yak
And a wall would make it work even better.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:34 pm to Y.A. Tittle
I use AOC as the absolute boogeyman but you’re a fool if you think the pendulum won’t swing back to give the Dems control of the Executive and at least one chamber.
If we accept that the Edecutive can declare a national emergency when he/she doesn’t get his way and that there for triggers a supermajority to override him, that’s super dangerous territory.
If we accept that the Edecutive can declare a national emergency when he/she doesn’t get his way and that there for triggers a supermajority to override him, that’s super dangerous territory.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:34 pm to GatorReb
quote:Cool, give them your money then
And a wall would make it work even better.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:35 pm to Yak
quote:That's not how this works.
Cool, give them your money then
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:35 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:Medicare for All is a popular platform, as well as gun control. Should we just allow those via EO if the President campaigned on them?
Are they getting elected president largely on the issue upon which you have them declaring a national emergency?
When AOC gets elected President on proposing implementation of the Green New Deal, we have much bigger problems than her potential to declare "National Emergencies."
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:35 pm to CptBengal
Wait Cpt is DJT still a cuck in your eyes?
Posted on 2/14/19 at 2:35 pm to Damone
quote:
Yeah, because precedent would actually stop Democrats from doing whatever they thought necessary to accomplish an end goal.
Exactly. This argument about precedent is dumb as frick. The dems have show time and again that they will do anything to expand their power.
Popular
Back to top


0












