- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Charlie Kirk assassinated in Utah
Posted on 10/1/25 at 11:28 am to White Tiger
Posted on 10/1/25 at 11:28 am to White Tiger
quote:
Has an autopsy been performed? Why no news about it?
Yes, one was done per Utah state law. The audio floating around stating one was not done has been proven to be incorrect.
Grok Summary
Posted on 10/1/25 at 3:14 pm to Hog on the Hill
Highly unusual to say the least. Without it how can the official narrative be confirmed especially without the projectile. Very little about this story makes sense. He assembled then disassembled then reassembled the weapon? There was no bipod or other support for the weapon to stabilize it for firing. No reason to believe he was a marksman who kept his skills honed.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 3:19 pm to Hog on the Hill
Also, no discussion of acoustical data which doubtless exists. This could easily localize the firing source within a few meters. Where are those data?
Posted on 10/2/25 at 3:39 am to Hog on the Hill
You had confidence in the FBI?
Posted on 10/2/25 at 9:06 pm to White Tiger
Lots of blood gushing for no exit wound
I call bs
I call bs
Posted on 10/3/25 at 10:23 am to djmed
The narrative makes no sense.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 11:42 am to White Tiger
I just watched both videos linked below and are very compelling.
The first one is more technical to explain his conclusions of the type of gun and where the shot came from.
The 2nd includes video of who could be the assassin(s).
Watching these 2 videos have me quite convinced now that the bullet came from behind Kirk.
Youtube: Video Blows up Official Account
Youtube: Video of Possible Assassins
Its baffling the crime scene was not secured so that any forensics could be completed to even support the FBI current narrative.
The first one is more technical to explain his conclusions of the type of gun and where the shot came from.
The 2nd includes video of who could be the assassin(s).
Watching these 2 videos have me quite convinced now that the bullet came from behind Kirk.
Youtube: Video Blows up Official Account
Youtube: Video of Possible Assassins
Its baffling the crime scene was not secured so that any forensics could be completed to even support the FBI current narrative.
This post was edited on 10/3/25 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 10/3/25 at 11:44 am to Zephyrius
Why is there no discussion of acoustic data? With AI it is difficult to know what the videos demonstrate. But, the narrative on its face is nonsense.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 11:52 am to White Tiger
quote:
Why is there no discussion of acoustic data?
Because it doesn't support the "government" fabricated conclusion.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 12:44 pm to Zephyrius
SIAP but this is by far the best video I've seen on Charlie's murder.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 12:52 pm to Hognutz
Now watch this video. Its the 2nd link in my post above.- I'm blown away and the FBI is purposely fricking up this investigation.
ETA: was having trouble imbedding this video-- up now
ETA: watch how the guy in white flinches but the camera guy doesn't. WTF is going on??!!??
ETA: was having trouble imbedding this video-- up now
ETA: watch how the guy in white flinches but the camera guy doesn't. WTF is going on??!!??
This post was edited on 10/3/25 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 10/3/25 at 12:53 pm to Zephyrius
Very likely. There is no reasonable doubt that an abundance of such data exists, but it is being completely ignored.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 1:17 pm to Zephyrius
Yeah, saw that the other day and it sounds plausible but the guest on with Jimmy shows the problem with the camera gun theory.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 2:06 pm to Hognutz
Some interesting video to assist of the timeline of Tyler Robinson's location at 12:44pm. Doesn't mean he isn't the guy but doesn't help the FBI timeline.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 10/3/25 at 9:02 pm to Hog on the Hill
quote:
it's possible to be shot with a .30-06 and not have the bullet exit. However, in Kirk's case, that is impossible
It certainly is not impossible
Posted on 10/6/25 at 2:48 pm to Zephyrius
quote:
Some interesting video to assist of the timeline of Tyler Robinson's location at 12:44pm. Doesn't mean he isn't the guy but doesn't help the FBI timeline.
What is this video supposed to show? It says they have footage of him entering a parking lot 20 minutes after the shooting. They have distance footage of a challenger with no proof it's his car.
But even if it is.. How is this going against the FBI timeline?
Posted on 10/6/25 at 4:54 pm to TigerMan327
quote:
They have distance footage of a challenger with no proof it's his car.
Tyler Robinson's phone pinged that area and the reason the FBI showed up there. Tyler Robinson's car is a Challenger.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 9:44 am to Zephyrius
quote:
Tyler Robinson's phone pinged that area and the reason the FBI showed up there. Tyler Robinson's car is a Challenger.
So, the FBI pinged his phone there and therefore it's part of the FBI timeline that he was there?
How is this new controversial information?
Posted on 10/7/25 at 11:08 am to TigerMan327
I have never seen a reported timeline from the FBI that Robinson was sitting in a parking lot 22min after the assassination 5 - 7min away from UVU campus. Not saying its impossible that he was able to do that but makes the timing itself very tight to accomplish.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:04 pm to Zephyrius
quote:
I have never seen a reported timeline from the FBI that Robinson was sitting in a parking lot 22min after the assassination 5 - 7min away from UVU campus. Not saying its impossible that he was able to do that but makes the timing itself very tight to accomplish.
I see. Is there any timeline released at all between the killing and him returning home that night? He lived like 4 hours away didnt he?
I remember someone posted a picture of him at dairy queen but i was reported as fake?
Popular
Back to top



0



