- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:06 am to SquatchDawg
quote:Eurocat
slimy and dishonest
Yep. Checks out.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:32 am to Eurocat
quote:
I can only imagine
quote:you are.
I could be wrong
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:33 am to Eurocat
You are almost always wrong. Every fricking time. 
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:39 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
If someone is asking you why you now hold position X when you used to hold position Y and your response is that you "were paid for your opinions" when you held position Y, the obvious implication is that you were paid to hold position Y.
That’s certainly one possible implication. On the other hand, if position X, or merely the passage of time, has made available facts to someone that were not previously known and which bear on those opinions, then there is a non-“I was paid to have a specific opinion” explanation for the statement. Does he strike you as someone who would casually admit to being paid to have a specific opinion, especially to a hostile question?
In the absence of a clarifying statement, I suppose everyone can just purport to read the man’s mind based on their own presumptions.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:43 am to Eurocat
One thing is for sure, he will not get an easy ride now. He be hit hard with real issues of substance and his responses will determine whether he remains a credible source of information and opinion. He has a hard row to hoe.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 10:58 am to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
On the other hand, if position X, or merely the passage of time, has made available facts to someone that were not previously known and which bear on those opinions, then there is a non-“I was paid to have a specific opinion” explanation for the statement.
Absolutely.
The problem is that isn't what Bongino said when asked. He chose to say "I was paid for my opinions".
It would be odd to try to infer what he meant by substituting what he could have said for what he actually said.
Popular
Back to top


0






