- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Guy asks protesters if they'll help shelter refugees at their house
Posted on 2/7/17 at 6:12 pm to dcrews
Posted on 2/7/17 at 6:12 pm to dcrews
quote:
emotional argument based on "feelings"
That isn't my problem. My arguments are not based on "feelings." I only ask that y'all don't answer their stupidity with stupidity.
quote:
It's like talking all kinds of smack about helping the homeless dude on the corner, and damning those who don't want to give him money, yet you won't help himself yourself either. How much do actually care at that point?
Cool, and this stupid argument says if you don't let him bunk with your kids you should shut your mouth about all homeless people.
1
Posted on 2/7/17 at 6:13 pm to Grim
Do you really know how many couples want to adopt and can't? Try another bullshite argument.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 7:01 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
That isn't my problem. My arguments are not based on "feelings." I only ask that y'all don't answer their stupidity with stupidity.
I didn't mean you personally, just people in general who make the argument solely on saving the women and children, like they actually care.
quote:
Cool, and this stupid argument says if you don't let him bunk with your kids you should shut your mouth about all homeless people.
No, it's pointing out the hypocrisy that people want something to be done, but want it done at someone else's expense.
Refugees will be living next to someone. Why, if you don't want to risk your family's safety, do you think it's okay to risk someone else's safety?
They cannot be properly vetted, therefore they should not be allowed entrance to the country until we can establish a proper vetting process. Those arguing against this, are only doing so to feel morally superior. But when the rubber meets the road, they aren't offering to help anyone. They aren't offering assistance. They are simply hastag warriors who don't give a damn, but want to look like they give a frick when they really don't.
I ask again also, why must they come here? It makes no geographical sense, and I can't imagine it's less expensive than if we were to be more of a financial assistant in all of this than a host.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 7:22 pm to PrimeTime Money
Guess what they say?
Lol. I dont even want most of my friends to live with me. You guys are failing to make any real point
This post was edited on 2/7/17 at 7:24 pm
Posted on 2/7/17 at 7:24 pm to JetsetNuggs
quote:
surprise, surprise, hypocrisy at its finest
Not at all. Not wanting a ban or letting someone in your house are two very different things. You guys are reaching hard
Posted on 2/7/17 at 7:28 pm to dcrews
quote:
Why, if you don't want to risk your family's safety, do you think it's okay to risk someone else's safety?
It has zero to do with safety. I wouldn't let anyone live with me because I just don't like people. I'm still fine with people coming to my country.
A strong vetting process and no automatic dependency are the right arguments, not the derp in this thread.
quote:
I ask again also, why must they come here?
They don't all come here.
Posted on 2/7/17 at 7:34 pm to dcrews
quote:
, it's pointing out the hypocrisy that people want something to be done, but want it done at someone else's expense.
Wut? Why is it at any more expense than anyone else moving in. You're assuming imminent danger.
quote:
They cannot be properly vetted, therefore they should not be allowed entrance to the country until we can establish a proper vetting process. Those arguing against this, are only doing so to feel morally superior. But when the rubber meets the road, they aren't offering to help anyone. They aren't offering assistance. They are simply hastag warriors who don't give a damn, but want to look like they give a frick when they really don't.
You're backwards. We just dont believe its right to stop people, which makes your point about us not helping a non sequitur. No one is argiung to help, they’re arguing against a ban. Pretty straight forward
Btw, our vetting process is stronger than Europe for sure
Posted on 2/8/17 at 11:46 am to TSLG
quote:
I really like that movie.
me too
Posted on 2/8/17 at 11:55 am to PrimeTime Money
quote:
Guy asks protesters if they'll help shelter refugees at their house
I remember reading something about someone asking celebs if they would sponsor Mexicans since Hollywood is so liberal......the universal answer was NO
Posted on 2/8/17 at 12:40 pm to PrimeTime Money
Kind of like when the guy asked some snowflakes in favor or redistribution of wealth if they also supported redistribution of GPA's.
Of course, they all said not part of my GPA. Why should I give part of my GPA to someone else?
Of course, they all said not part of my GPA. Why should I give part of my GPA to someone else?
Posted on 2/8/17 at 1:00 pm to Grim
Adopting not the same as hosting
Posted on 2/8/17 at 1:18 pm to Grim
Multitudes of people do this every day all across the country.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 1:22 pm to Ebbandflow
quote:
they’re arguing against a ban.
What ban?
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News