Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Kerch Straight Bridge in Crimea has been destroyed | Page 6 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Kerch Straight Bridge in Crimea has been destroyed

Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:31 am to
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
26788 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Zelensky has miscalculated, badly, because none of the internationalist players involved in propping up Kiev actually care about Ukraine. If they truly did care about Ukraine,


You misunderstand. Zelensky didn't miscalculate anything. He IS one of the players involved that doesn't give a shite about Ukraine.

These fricks... all of them are after a one world govt. NONE of them care about people or their assigned country.
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:33 am to
quote:

They also RA TF out of you and try and get you banned for letting them know EXACTLY who they really are

It also appears they are manning the downvotes with real commitment.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471589 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:34 am to
quote:

You really think he’s going to give up Crimea?

That depends entirely on how fast he can regroup or response post-winter.

quote:

The nukes will fly before Putin allows that to happen.

Then Putin is going to launch nukes regardless. That's what you don't get. You keep trying to spin this as an issue for anyone other than Putin/Russia, when it's 100% on them. If they have resigned themselves to nukes, then they will (or at least try to ) launch nukes.

The only other option is permanent appeasement to Russia for anything. Literally.

quote:

Russia has the grain and the fuel to last through winter. Ukraine and Europe do not. Y



quote:

You’re already thinking another six months out when now winter is here.

I imagine Russia is going to regroup during winter, like Ukraine. That's why Ukraine has been so aggro lately. They want Kherson ASAP due to winter being on their doorstep.

quote:

Key word

Russia can throw more troops at Ukraine but they've spent a large part of their load on tanks, aircraft, etc. And if Ukraine is given time to regroup over winter, they will have a much better defensive position/strategy when Russia can mobilize those troops.
Posted by HVAU
Up over here
Member since Sep 2010
5165 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Ones that have not told me Fauci is the hero of the Republic. That’s who you’re listening to.


What the frick does Fauci have to do with this?

I’d recommend, in the future you listen to your OAN, Fox, Newsmax, and Infowars, then listen to your CNN, NBC, ABC, and try to glean real information to ascertain what is real. If your criteria for a good news source is simply “the one that didn’t tell me what I didn’t want to hear” you’re going to be woefully uninformed.
Posted by THog
Member since Dec 2021
2282 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:36 am to
Russia will not quit until NATO removes itself from Ukraine, including biolabs. Imagine how America would react if Russia put weapons near the USA border, somewhere like Cuba? What would we do?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471589 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:43 am to
quote:

What the frick does Fauci have to do with this?

At least he didn't bring up the border, which is my favorite non sequitur in this discussion
Posted by LookSquirrel
Old Millville
Member since Oct 2019
7655 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:45 am to
Russia has no reason to use nukes, right now. Their use of nukes is spelled out in official doctrine as defensive. We, the "US" however do not have that limitation.

Keep hearing "tactical nukes" thrown around. Why? There are plenty of "conventional" weapons that can be used without crossing any nuclear threshold.
Posted by MilwaukeeKosherDills
Member since Aug 2021
487 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:47 am to
Damned shame. That was a nice bridge. A major engineering feat. I can see the military necessity from the Ukrainian point of view, but it's too bad it came to this.

This war may go down as one of the most stupid in all history. The two countries could have been close friends. Not as close as the US and Canada but close enough to benefit each other.

Now for generations they will see each other as enemies. The Ukrainians call the Russian Orcs and the Russians reciprocate by calling the Ukrainians cockroaches. When there is that level of dehumanization they will have a very difficult time negotiating any kind of peace deal.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471589 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Keep hearing "tactical nukes" thrown around. Why?

Fear mongering. You see how effective it is on this very board, with a solid % of posters legitimately convinced this is Russia's next step.

quote:

There are plenty of "conventional" weapons that can be used without crossing any nuclear threshold.

I agree, and I think Russia FAFO'd in this initial offensive and will regroup over winter and think about what to do in response, while Ukraine regroups and establishes defensive positions.
Posted by Shut Up Mulllet
Member since Apr 2021
990 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:48 am to
Nobody is nuking anybody. Not going to happen. Just another proxy war to add to the history books. Everyone will have forgotten this event in a couple months.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471589 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:49 am to
quote:

The two countries could have been close friends.

This was never an option.

Ukraine could be a puppet of Russia or an enemy of Russia via EU integration. Russia doesn't do diplomacy any other way.
Posted by HVAU
Up over here
Member since Sep 2010
5165 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Europe will not quit until Russia removes itself from Ukraine

Fixed for you

Has NATO invaded its neighbors, or any European or European adjacent country in recent history? No.

Has Russia invaded any of its neighbors, or any European or European adjacent country in recent history? Ukraine, Georgia and Chechnya.

NATO and Europe have as much to be concerned about with Russia and Russian weapons at their border, as Russia does conversely. The rationales that suggest to appease Putin in the matter are flimsy at best.
This post was edited on 10/8/22 at 10:52 am
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:49 am to
quote:

What the frick does Fauci have to do with this?


Because I’m trying to lift the wool from your eyes. You people in that thread talk no differently, think no differently, and act no differently than Covidiots. It’s verbatim how you act.

Any information you don’t like, you flip your shite and label it Russian disinformation. Anyone who questions the authorities in this war, you tell them to shut the frick up and do as you’re fricking told. If anyone suspects we’re being fed propaganda from the West, we’re told to stop thinking and listen to the experts. If anyone says what we’re currently doing may get more people killed in the end and that the cure may be worse than the disease/war itself, you’re called a Putin cocksucker. If we suspect they’re intentionally prolonging the conflict to line the pockets of organizations and special interest groups and consolidate power, you’re called a crazy person. If you’re not for printing endless pallets of cash and have questions where that money is going, then you want people to die.

Again no fricking difference between you and a Fauci acolyte whatsoever. It’s the exact same line of reasoning, the exact same insults, the exact same bullying tactics, and the exact same lemming mentality. And here’s the thing: you probably agree with me on Fauci since he’s the most hated person in America, but you just can’t see this.

quote:

I’d recommend, in the future you listen to your OAN, Fox, Newsmax, and Infowars, then listen to your CNN, NBC, ABC, and try to glean real information to ascertain what is real. If your criteria for a good news source is simply “the one that didn’t tell me what I didn’t want to hear” you’re going to be woefully uninformed.


Don’t listen to literally any of these. Guessing you’re Gen X or a Boomer, but no I listen to individuals and not organizations. Individuals who have earned my trust and not lied to me. All of these organizations are fricking liars and are not to be taken seriously.
This post was edited on 10/8/22 at 1:08 pm
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
96319 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:50 am to
quote:

legitimately convinced this is Russia's next step.



The person you voted for just said this was a possibikity

So does the media daily. The ones that you rely on for your up to date info of this war
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Has NATO invaded its neighbors, or any European or European adjacent country in recent history? No.


Has NATO been invaded? No. So therefore I’m not interested in a war with Russia, proxy or otherwise.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Nobody is nuking anybody. Not going to happen. Just another proxy war to add to the history books. Everyone will have forgotten this event in a couple months.


Oh the arrogance. The international equivalent of “Hold My Beer”.
Posted by Stidham8
Member since Aug 2018
10003 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:51 am to
The attack on the bridge is something Russia can and will use effectively to further push towards all out war.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471589 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:53 am to
quote:

The person you voted for just said this was a possibikity

No the person I voted for is in trouble for wearing a "White Lives Matter" t-shirt.
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Fear mongering. You see how effective it is on this very board, with a solid % of posters legitimately convinced this is Russia's next step.

This is not happening. Your war mongering aside
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Has NATO invaded its neighbors, or any European or European adjacent country in recent history? No.
The obama biden nuland CIA presence can be characterized as belligerent action.

In fact it is textbook definition in the Great-Powers philosophies of 'invasion', 'adventuring'
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram