- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Laura Loomer - An Telling Tweet Saga
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:45 pm to Jjdoc
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:45 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
It's not disingenuous. It's straight up lying. He was in the other thread where the link to her not being a part of Trump campaign was posted.
Is she being paid through any of the pacs to act as a social media influencer?
JoJo from Jerz, The Krassenbots, Brooklyn Dad and those two screaming wimpy boys aren't part of the Joe Biden campaign directly but they're funneled money to be Twitter inflamers. Almost certainly the case here with Looney Toon and Alex B.
They're not doing this act genuinely. It's why multiple times they've stepped on rakes with attack tweets that are contrary to previous tweets or their own actions.
This post was edited on 5/24/23 at 3:47 pm
1
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:46 pm to Pettifogger
Notice this tweeter
Don't notice Jeb Bush
God I can't wait til some fed made up wing of the KKK endorses Trump
This is such a new and bold strategy
Don't notice Jeb Bush
God I can't wait til some fed made up wing of the KKK endorses Trump
This is such a new and bold strategy
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:46 pm to Pettifogger
She posts a lot of despicable stuff and spends every waking moment doing it.
It’s obvious she’s in a plausible deniability role.
It’s obvious she’s in a plausible deniability role.
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:46 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
The idea that we shouldn't talk about people who garner millions of impressions a day on behalf of political candidates is stupid.
No it absolutely is not. We should revile, attack, and ostracize anyone giving those fricking retards a platform. The solution is not leaning into the “useless internet loser” problem. The solution is rejecting it.
quote:
They're a huge factor in modern politics
No, they really aren’t.
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:47 pm to Gaggle
quote:
Don't notice Jeb Bush
Notice what?
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:47 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
It’s a legitimate question. I cannot figure out how or why adults pay attention to these people, or constantly monitor their useless and irrelevant opinions.
Because they're extremely influential in American politics. Nobody asks these questions about sycophants for candidates that go on the cable news shows, and these folks are probably far more influential than those people at this point.
I genuinely understand where you're coming from. But they're going to be influential whether we discuss their stupidity or not. It's how modern campaigns are run, we can't just wish it away.
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:48 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
The idea that we shouldn't talk about people who garner millions of impressions a day on behalf of political candidates is stupid.
Jjdoc is genuinely upset that we’re not discussing his carefully crafted messaging. After all, he spends so much time on it.
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:48 pm to Lsuhoohoo
quote:
JoJo from Jerz, The Krassenbots, Brooklyn Dad and those two screaming wimpy boys aren't part of the Joe Biden campaign directly but they're funneled money to be Twitter inflamers. Almost certainly the case here with Looney Toon and Alex B.
They're not doing this act genuinely. It's why multiple times they've stepped on rakes with attack tweets that are contrary to previous tweets or their own actions.
100%.
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:49 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
No, they really aren’t.
They're more influential than talking heads on cable news and talk radio combined.
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:49 pm to Gaggle
quote:
Notice this tweeter
She’s not just a tweeter. She’s a paid influencer being used by the Trump campaign to maintain his base.
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:49 pm to Fun Bunch
He gave support for DeSantis, was gonna officially endorse and vie for a spot on the campaign. But then there was intense backlash, aides leaking shite, and he backed down and released a denial. You know how it goes
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:50 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Because they're extremely influential in American politics.
Based on what? And don’t give me number of followers as the answer.
quote:
Nobody asks these questions about sycophants for candidates that go on the cable news shows
I do.
quote:
But they're going to be influential whether we discuss their stupidity or not.
This is where I disagree. The retards who follow these internet losers CAN be shamed into coming back to reality.
quote:
It's how modern campaigns are run, we can't just wish it away.
It can be rejected. Playing along with it is a total losing strategy for anyone to the right of Karl Marx.
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:50 pm to keakar
quote:
you are closer to being rons campaign manager than she is of being in any way affiliated with the trump campaign
Well she was formally considered for a role on the Trump Campaign so I don't think that's true, sport
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:51 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
They're more influential than talking heads on cable news and talk radio combined.
And guess what? None of those people are truly influential either. All three categories only serve to divide, make money for themselves, and stir pointless shite up.
The vast majority of the voting population doesn’t consume cable news, talk radio, or internet loser opinions.
This post was edited on 5/24/23 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:52 pm to Indefatigable
I respect your position I just think it's a little ostrich like
Especially in a thread about how dumb and useless one of the worst offenders of this class is
Especially in a thread about how dumb and useless one of the worst offenders of this class is
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:54 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I respect your position I just think it's a little ostrich like
It isn’t burying my head in the sand to say that these people need to be rejected. Outwardly rejected.
Not ignored. Rejected. Castigated. Insulted. Ostracized. Constantly told how useless and pointless everything they say or do is because they are inherently irrelevant, and only propped up by the faux-legitimacy of “followers”.
Laying down for it isn’t the answer. Republicans cannot win the internet game.
This post was edited on 5/24/23 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:55 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
The vast majority of the voting population doesn’t consume cable news, talk radio, or internet loser opinions.
Explain Trump winning 2016 then. You seem to think Twitter and the internet had no impact, so tell me how he won.
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:56 pm to Indefatigable
How can we castigate them by ignoring them. Their idiocy needs a bright light. You seem to disagree and that’s not unusual. 
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:57 pm to Indefatigable
I'm not really understanding what you want here. You don't want us to ignore them but we can't point out when they make fools of themselves?
Posted on 5/24/23 at 3:58 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
quote:
Explain Trump winning 2016 then.
What is there to explain? Donald Trump won because his opponent was the most unlikeable POTUS candidate in recorded history, and because Jill Stein siphoned votes from that unpopular candidate in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.
Donald Trump did not win because of memes or Twitter, despite how much fun the Great Meme War was.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News