- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mueller To Make Statement At 11:00 ET
Posted on 5/29/19 at 1:50 pm to MrLarson
Posted on 5/29/19 at 1:50 pm to MrLarson
The two most important things said were at the beginning of his speech.
1) He is closing the investigation
2) He is resigning from the Justice Department
The rest is just open-ended statements and subtle jabs.
1) He is closing the investigation
2) He is resigning from the Justice Department
The rest is just open-ended statements and subtle jabs.
1
Posted on 5/29/19 at 1:59 pm to Racist Tomato
Look for Bob Mueller to "commit suicide" in the coming days. Can't have him testifying before Congress anymore.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 2:06 pm to NC_Tigah
and that was all a stupid show. Just like this is a stupid show.
Going after Presidents for process crimes is stupid when the underlying crimes (if any) were not proven. It's just a flex by the House, now and then.
On the other hand, Presidents should know this is the way it works.
ETA -- I am not talking about FISA abuse here. That's a different matter.
Going after Presidents for process crimes is stupid when the underlying crimes (if any) were not proven. It's just a flex by the House, now and then.
On the other hand, Presidents should know this is the way it works.
ETA -- I am not talking about FISA abuse here. That's a different matter.
This post was edited on 5/29/19 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 5/29/19 at 2:10 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
It's all in the Mueller report. When Trump leaves office, assuming it's still within the legal time limitation, a federal prosecutor will use this as a guide for a prosecution decision.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 2:24 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:i never said this. i said at no point has he definitively stated trump is guilty and he has had every opportunity to do so. moreover, he agreed with barr's summary. moreover, you didn't answer the question. go figure
If Mueller's opinion on the matter doesn't matter
Posted on 5/29/19 at 2:27 pm to bfniii
There is a new thread where NBC went to the Mueller office and the SC stated he did not contradict Barr.
"He [Mueller] did not contradict. We went back to the Special Counsel’s Office today and said, “Did you contradict what the Attorney General said when he said that ‘if it had not been for that opinion, you would have charged’?” NBC News' Julia Ainsley said on MSNBC.
"And they said, 'We’re not contradicting, but we’re providing more context that' — It’s not even point. They didn’t even make a decision because they didn’t look at this like a prosecution. They didn’t walk down that road because they stopped because of this opinion,"
"He [Mueller] did not contradict. We went back to the Special Counsel’s Office today and said, “Did you contradict what the Attorney General said when he said that ‘if it had not been for that opinion, you would have charged’?” NBC News' Julia Ainsley said on MSNBC.
"And they said, 'We’re not contradicting, but we’re providing more context that' — It’s not even point. They didn’t even make a decision because they didn’t look at this like a prosecution. They didn’t walk down that road because they stopped because of this opinion,"
Posted on 5/29/19 at 2:29 pm to Jjdoc
which of course highlights mueller's duplicity. either barr was accurate or trump is guilty. if barr is accurate, there is no need to make any statements about the possibility of obstruction. he's talking out of both sides of his mouth which should make any reasonable person question his motives. why don't any libs here acknowledge the political makeup of the sc team?
Posted on 5/29/19 at 2:33 pm to bfniii
quote:
why don't any libs here acknowledge the political makeup of the sc team?
Because they loved it
Posted on 5/29/19 at 2:37 pm to MrLarson
quote:
why don't any libs here acknowledge the political makeup of the sc team?
Because they loved it
Yeah, we loved having it run by a life long republican
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:40 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Yeah, we loved having it run by a life long republican
Who obviously is a fan of our president.
While not mentioning the rest of the angry democrats.
Can't wait to investigate the next dem president for bullshite with a team of Republicans. It's going to be wonderful.
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:41 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Yeah, we loved having it run by a life long republican
Yet all the attorneys hired were Democrat supporters....
Posted on 5/29/19 at 5:56 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Yeah, we loved having it run by a life long republican
Like McCain, Romney and Flake?
Dipshit
Page 16 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News