- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: My Pillow Guy Talk
Posted on 8/6/21 at 6:28 pm to BillRose
Posted on 8/6/21 at 6:28 pm to BillRose
quote:Pretty much, yeah. Why would it have value if it can't be verified?
So data that cannot be proven false has no value?
quote:
If it cannot be proven false it is true.
Wow! Conservative mentality in a nutshell right there.
quote:Then Lindell should bring evidence that he can prove instead of presenting unfalsifiable data and making a big show of it.
If it s true it is easily prove true.
quote:I do. The question you should ask yourself is why do you support a method which absolutely cannot do that?
Why wouldn't you support any method of proving who won the election?
quote:
As for the invitations they are for qualified professionals
Right. Qualified professionals will not attend because they see what's going on. Cherry-picked politicians will attend, and they will bring their own "qualified professionals".
2
Posted on 8/6/21 at 6:33 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Then Lindell should bring evidence that he can prove instead of presenting unfalsifiable data and making a big show of it.
You have no clue what he has.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 6:34 pm to davyjones
quote:Duh.
Lemme guess, "they didn't vote for Biden, they voted against Trump"?
quote:Yeah. You lived through 2020, right? And you know how unlikable Hillary is, right? Also something like 15 million people reached voting age in the meantime. You are so blinded by your infatuation with Trump that you can't see the obviousness of it all.
Which would be super crazy because Trump himself increased his 2016 vote count by like 13 million, and the Democratic candidate showed about 20 million more votes in 2020 than in 2016. So that rascal Donald Trump roused 35 or so million more people to vote in 2020 than did in 2016.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 6:40 pm to Korkstand
quote:
You are so blinded by your hatred of Trump that you can't see the obviousness of it all.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 6:40 pm to Korkstand
quote:
And you know how unlikable Hillary is, right?
Strongly disagree and deem that a convenient cop out. Any unpopularity Hillary Clinton suffered (and any resulting loss of voter interest) was made up in whole, most especially at that particular point in woke American history, by the fact that before the Democratic voters lay the mystical "first female American President". That alone maxed out all Democratic voter support on election day. First viable female candidate for President versus the monster womanizer Donale Trump. Naw, Trump would have beat any possible Democratic candidate on that date.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 6:42 pm to mightyMick
quote:I'm not afraid of any audits. Audit whatever you want. I would like to see a system that is 100% accurate and fraud-proof.
Easy way to resolve this. Conduct the forensic audits in the swing states, better yet, all states. You want the truth don't you? I'll accept the results, will you, or will your brain not allow it? Stop the bullshite. Have the audits. If this was the most secure election ever, then what are you morons afraid of? Are you afraid of the facts and reality? Sure looks that way.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 6:43 pm to mightyMick
quote:Well according to him he has data packets. I know what those are, and I know how easy they are to fake, and I know that there is no way to prove that they are faked (if done well).
You have no clue what he has.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 6:47 pm to mightyMick
quote:
You have no clue what he has.
I can assure you he does not have anything that’s not available to the general public, this is all a circus sideshow
Posted on 8/6/21 at 6:47 pm to davyjones
quote:Most dems thought it was in the bag for all the reasons you've laid out. That suppressed the turnout.
Strongly disagree and deem that a convenient cop out. Any unpopularity Hillary Clinton suffered (and any resulting loss of voter interest) was made up in whole, most especially at that particular point in woke American history, by the fact that before the Democratic voters lay the mystical "first female American President". That alone maxed out all Democratic voter support on election day. First viable female candidate for President versus the monster womanizer Donale Trump.
quote:Yet he still didn't get more votes than she did.
Naw, Trump would have beat any possible Democratic candidate on that date.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 6:50 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Yet he still didn't get more votes than she did.
He likely did. The Dems just didn’t know how much they would have to cheat. They didn’t make that mistake again.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 6:53 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Most dems thought it was in the bag for all the reasons you've laid out. That suppressed the turnout.
I mean c'mon, we could just say that for Trump as well.
quote:
Yet he still didn't get more votes than she did.
All the more reason for his victory being even more impressive. Deck stacked against him, and he outmaneuvered her in earning the right electoral votes in the right places.
JMO of course. I ain't trying to be insulting or dismissive. I know you have a vastly differing opinion. Me, you....just our opinion.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 6:53 pm to hubertcumberdale
quote:Yeah think about it, he's claiming to have something that can only be acquired via illegal means.
I can assure you he does not have anything that’s not available to the general public, this is all a circus sideshow
Posted on 8/6/21 at 6:59 pm to Korkstand
If something cannot be proven false why is the data without value? You make no sense, the essence of science is proving your theory is wrong and if you can't do that then continue as if it were proven true. The leftard mentality is the absence of truth or reality, nice to see you are right in there. How do you know his data is unfalsifiable (not a word leftard)? How do you know his method cannot prove election fraud? Why don't you believe he will have qualified professionals there? You are still in denial and refuse to see. It is called the head up @ss syndrome.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:07 pm to BillRose
quote:Literally the only requirements for a valid hypothesis is that it must be falsifiable and testable.
If something cannot be proven false why is the data without value? You make no sense, the essence of science is proving your theory is wrong and if you can't do that then continue as if it were proven true.
quote:It is a word, it means not falsifiable. And it is not falsifiable because it cannot be tested for accuracy (as long as they didn't completely frick it up).
How do you know his data is unfalsifiable (not a word leftard)?
quote:Because I know a few things about this.
How do you know his method cannot prove election fraud?
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:09 pm to Korkstand
quote:
I know what those are, and I know how easy they are to fake, and I know that there is no way to prove that they are faked (if done well).
Well, then it sounds like either a bunch of neckbeards from Silicon Valley who are invited to the Symposium are going to be 5 million dollars richer, or people are going to scream at the sky saying that there was no way to win the challenge. Let's see what happens, shall we?
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:12 pm to hubertcumberdale
quote:
assure you he does not have anything that’s not available to the general public, this is all a circus sideshow
Fantastic! Will you please share with the class where that real-time IP traffic inbound from foreign sources generated on the map from his absolute proof documentary came from?
I know a group of people who have been working tirelessly since that absolute proof documentary was published who would like to get their hands on that data
When can I tell them that you will produce this information?
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:14 pm to dawgfan24348
Why not, he is the only guy trying to find out WTF happened.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:18 pm to VoxDawg
Third choice, his data proves China committed election fraud. What kind of picture is that going to look like?
I could see why many would like to keep that hidden. Possible war thing. Biden declaring martial law, who knows. I'm sure Lindell knows how serious this is.
I could see why many would like to keep that hidden. Possible war thing. Biden declaring martial law, who knows. I'm sure Lindell knows how serious this is.
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:24 pm to Korkstand
I know whatit means leftard. How do you know what his method for finding truth is? I know it can be proven through packet captures. What is your hypothesis for why it can't? Are you saying the material has been compromised? How would you know that?Or are you saying that since MSNBC didn't come up with it there is no way it is true? What makes you think Lindell is lying or is not credible?
Posted on 8/6/21 at 7:32 pm to Korkstand
quote:
I'm not afraid of any audits. Audit whatever you want. I would like to see a system that is 100% accurate and fraud-proof.
Like our elections?
Page 9 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News