- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official Pillow Guy Symposium: only flat-earthers remain excited
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:20 pm to YankeeBama
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:20 pm to YankeeBama
You guys have to understand, our evidence isn't as air tight at the Russian Hooker Dossier.
The Jr G men forensics team want solid evidence.
The Jr G men forensics team want solid evidence.
0
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:20 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I’ve never understood how Lindell was going to get this stuff magically in front of SCOTUS to begin with. There are lots of steps before that.
Paxton is still Texas' A.G., and our Solicitor General (Hawkins) who wouldn't sign off on Texas' last election foray to the Supreme Court decamped for more reputable parts in January.
Our new S.G. (Stone) was Ted Cruz' Chief Counsel, so presumably he won't be as recalcitrant as our former Supreme Court advocate. If the entire Lindell team is willing to attest as previously stated, it's about as strong as our last Bill of Complaint.
This post was edited on 8/13/21 at 2:41 am
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:21 pm to Langland
quote:OMG! You are still watching?
Wanna know how I know you're not watching?
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:21 pm to Langland
quote:
You have selective hearing and are disingenuous.
i'm multi tasking with work at the moment. YankeeBama has been here most of the time , i'm asking him to find out if i missed context. similar to all those earlier that logged on and said they were showing proof as they aired the mock election. people mishear and misinterpret things it happens chill out.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:24 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
OMG! You are still watching?
how could you not? with the quality work done here i mean..... i started out liberal and i'm like 3 theories away from biting the mypillow and buying in .....
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:25 pm to oklahogjr
This presentation has been really good.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:27 pm to Poohbear8487
quote:
This presentation has been really good.
I agree.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:32 pm to GhostOfFreedom
Anyone have a link to David Clements presentation, I need to share it with others!!!!!
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:34 pm to GhostOfFreedom
One of the best
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:35 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
started out liberal and i'm like 3 theories away from biting the mypillow and buying in .....
If you are so convinced if was a free, fair, secure election why are you still here?
Why don’t you start your own thread with ALL the evidence of the most secure election in our history for the MOST popular president in our history.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:37 pm to Poohbear8487
yeah this guy has been a good presenter. better than mike and Franks for sure.
with that said i have the same struggle of not knowing what is supposition and what is actually factual.
with that said i have the same struggle of not knowing what is supposition and what is actually factual.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:38 pm to Langland
quote:
You have selective hearing and are disingenuous.
Trolling ops often include concern trolls.
quote:
A concern troll is a false-flag pseudonym created by a user whose actual point of view is opposed to the one that the troll claims to hold. The concern troll posts in web forums devoted to its declared point of view and attempts to sway the group's actions or opinions while claiming to share their goals, but with professed "concerns". The goal is to sow fear, uncertainty, and doubt within the group often by appealing to outrage culture.[63] This is a particular case of sockpuppeting and safe-baiting
Psychological profile:
quote:
Trolling correlates positively with sadism,[20][21][22][23] trait psychopathy,[20][21][22][23] and Machiavellianism[61] (see Dark triad). Trolls take pleasure from causing pain and emotional suffering.[20][22][23] Their ability to upset or harm gives them a feeling of power.[61] Psychological researches conducted in the fields of personality psychology and cyberpsychology report that trolling behaviour qualifies as an anti-social behaviour and is strongly correlated to sadistic personality disorder (SPD).[20][22][23] Researches have shown that men, compared with women, are more likely to perpetrate trolling behaviour; these gender differences in online anti-social behaviour may be a reflection of gender stereotypes, where agentic characteristics such as competitiveness and dominance are encouraged in men.[23] The results corroborated that gender (male) is a significant predictor of trolling behaviour, alongside trait psychopathy and sadism to be significant positive predictors.[23] Moreover, these studies have shown that people who enjoy trolling online tend to also enjoy hurting other people in everyday life, therefore corroborating a longstanding and persistent pattern of psychopathological sadism.[22]
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:39 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
yeah this guy has been a good presenter. better than mike and Franks for sure.
with that said i have the same struggle of not knowing what is supposition and what is actually factual.
Makes sense. Difference is a lot of the information he presented has been known for months by some of us so it’s nice to see someone put it together. If this was my first time seeing a lot of it, would probably be skeptical as well
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:43 pm to Tigers2010a
If I had my druthers, the lion's share of this event would've been Keshel, Clements and Waldron.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:44 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
david clements is avoiding the subject of absolute proof and bitching about bernie.
This is my favorite photo of you:
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:44 pm to Poohbear8487
quote:
This presentation has been really good.
I was telling people here the first day, that on day 3 you will have your best sum up presentations to leave a lasting impression. Looks like I was onto something
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:45 pm to VoxDawg
When Mike is on it sounds/feels like an old episode of The PTL Club with Jim and Tammy Faye.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:49 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
quote:
The Russia Collusion is pretty damned clear to me!
=========
Excellent this is easy then
Who committed the the crime?(please provide named individuals)
What specifically did they do to influence the election? And when did they do it?
What law does it violate?
What evidence to you have to confirm your statement?
Go ahead - apply your own approach to all political issues -
the floor is yours.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 3:50 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
oklahogjr
Not watching but if it's shown that a given state's election mechanisms COULD have been compromised, then the burden of proof now falls on that State's SoS to demonstrate the fidelity of their election.
It's one thing to stitch together a cogent narrative of fraud in a legal arena. Maybe that hasn't been done.
But the flip side now has to be done, i.e., PROVE in the face of compromised mechanisms that your election has fidelity. THAT hasn't been done either.
Page 100 of 106
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News