- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PANIC in DC: PACER Judicial Records System Hacked
Posted on 8/10/25 at 9:02 pm to TutHillTiger
Posted on 8/10/25 at 9:02 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
The Scope of the Intrusion and Initial Responses Investigators believe the hackers, potentially state-sponsored actors from adversaries like Russia or China, infiltrated the systems as early as mid-2024, siphoning data over months before detection.
Was anybody doing anything in the government during the Biden years or was it just selling out our country?
This post was edited on 8/10/25 at 9:04 pm
0
Posted on 8/10/25 at 9:14 pm to RCDfan1950
quote:
but he ain’t threatening to wreck our Constitutional Republic.
Not overtly. But covertly, yes, he is. And he’s largely won his opening salvoes.
Posted on 8/10/25 at 9:17 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
This happens all the time
Posted on 8/10/25 at 9:25 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
Thats what i thought
You did nothing. You can't even support your argument at close to the same scrutiny level as mine. Watch: what evidence do you have that she has more to give?
Posted on 8/10/25 at 9:48 pm to VoxDawg
You're speaking to child like minds here, they don't see the king is getting ready to go down. They're still distracted with Epstein.
Posted on 8/10/25 at 9:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:She's dead. See how fricking easy that was
You did nothing. You can't even support your argument at close to the same scrutiny level as mine. Watch: what evidence do you have that she has more to give?
Posted on 8/10/25 at 10:09 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
She's dead. See how fricking easy that was
That didn't answer the question.
Just change has to had, to avoid your gotcha attempt.
What evidence do you have that she had more to give? You're supported your claims with literally nothing.
Posted on 8/10/25 at 10:11 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
How can this not be seen as an act of war?
We would probably be shocked the volume of cyber violations we both suffer and commit any given day
Posted on 8/10/25 at 10:12 pm to NoSaint
quote:
We would probably be shocked the volume of cyber violations we both suffer and commit any given day
Correct
Posted on 8/10/25 at 10:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:yes the frick it did. the woman said I AM NOT SUICIDAL. Then she commits suicide? yeah. sure
That didn't answer the question.
Posted on 8/10/25 at 10:14 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
yes the frick it did. the woman said I AM NOT SUICIDAL.
That has nothing to do with this
quote:
What evidence do you have that she had more to give?
If she had more to give, why not post who else she had information on?
She sued and exposed the conspiracy, so "she was scared for her life" doesn't work. That was also true when she started this. Nothing happened to her. She testified multiple times. Nothing happened to her.
So "they" wait until about a decade later when she has had no worthwhile input on the situation in years to kill her...because? When they could have stopped all of this a decade ago?
Much logic
Posted on 8/10/25 at 10:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:She's dead. Your questions are dumb and devoid of any critical reasoning skills.
If she had more to give, why not post who else she had information on?
Posted on 8/10/25 at 10:39 pm to AuburnTigers
Shes dead.
yeah, but why didnt she tell us more after she died? - SFP
yeah, but why didnt she tell us more after she died? - SFP
Posted on 8/10/25 at 10:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:BECAUSE SHE WAS MURDERED. Hard to talk when you are dead, no?
f she had more to give, why not post who else she had information on?
Hard to be a witness when you are dead, no?
Posted on 8/10/25 at 10:41 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:Here SFP. I posted the answer multiple times. Maybe you can wrap your head around it now
BECAUSE SHE WAS MURDERED. Hard to talk when you are dead, no?
Hard to be a witness when you are dead, no?
Posted on 8/10/25 at 10:44 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
She's dead.
There was time between her post you referenced and her death.
Now answer the question and stop dodging as usual
Posted on 8/10/25 at 10:45 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
BECAUSE SHE WAS MURDERED. Hard to talk when you are dead, no?
Was there time between the post and death?
Posted on 8/10/25 at 10:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You are trying your hardest to create this imaginary scenario in your head where you are right about everything and its so pathetic and desperate.
Was there time between the post and death?
She had information, she posted she wasnt suicidal, then her death was ruled suicide. Length of time between posts is irrelevant. She was murdered for what she knew. Anyone with a brain would draw that conclusion.
If you think differently, then you are naive
Posted on 8/10/25 at 11:04 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
You are trying your hardest to create this imaginary scenario in your head where you are right about everything and its so pathetic and desperate.
You keep deflecting
Then I try to steer you back and you refuse again and deflect
Then you apparently think this is a rhetoric victory
quote:
She had information, she posted she wasnt suicidal, then her death was ruled suicide.
And in-between those events, OR for the decade prior, why didn't she spill the beans?
quote:
She was murdered for what she knew
And yet, not murdered prior to her much more impactful lawsuits and depositions? Why?
Posted on 8/10/25 at 11:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:projection as usual
You keep deflecting
Then I try to steer you back and you refuse again and deflect
Then you apparently think this is a rhetoric victory
quote:pivot, pivot, pivot
And in-between those events, OR for the decade prior, why didn't she spill the beans?
quote:Cant speak for her murderers. You'll have to ask them.
And yet, not murdered prior to her much more impactful lawsuits and depositions? Why?
So your defense is, She should have been murdered sooner. If she would have died sooner, then it would be believable....but because there was a length of time between her post and her death, she clearly didnt know anything and suicide was probably the cause and no foul play took place?
Pretty weak stance there Counselman.
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News