- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Political debates: No longer needed?
Posted on 8/20/23 at 7:37 pm to oldhickory1812
Posted on 8/20/23 at 7:37 pm to oldhickory1812
quote:
there is not an answer that fits every situation, you have to adapt to every particular circumstance.
so C?
0
Posted on 8/20/23 at 7:42 pm to BugAC
Loved watching Biden debate . What a clown. Hid in basement and got over 81 millonn votes. 
Posted on 8/20/23 at 8:15 pm to Madking
quote:
Same thin arguments that don’t hold up past simple scrutiny. Same regurgitation of propaganda, same dishonest half statements and false statement spin, same shameless hypocrisy and double standards, same inverse perception of reality.
yup
Posted on 8/21/23 at 6:17 am to Adam Banks
quote:
The general public has no knowledge of the issues or the governing process.
This statement is gross
Posted on 8/21/23 at 6:19 am to Wednesday
quote:
This statement is gross
But not inaccurate.
Hell, hardcore political fans have issues discussing the issues. I'm still waiting on a precise, operative definition of "globalism/globalist"...going on 8 years now.
Or, if you want another great example, count the number of times ignorants call Ron Destansis "Establishment".
Hell, just this weekend I had people who claim to be fighting Socialists promoting socialist policies (tariffs to redistribute wealth from productive to unproductive citizens so that government can choose economic winners and losers directly).
This post was edited on 8/21/23 at 6:21 am
Posted on 8/21/23 at 6:24 am to BugAC
Should be required to be the nominee.
Posted on 8/21/23 at 6:29 am to BugAC
quote:
D
None of the above.
Posted on 8/21/23 at 6:35 am to BugAC
D) not needed when you're leading by 50+
Posted on 8/21/23 at 8:07 am to BugAC
the usual formats are not debates.
candidate spews bs.
you need to break it down and address each element.
then you get candidate to address your reply.
irl theres no time for indepth on anything.
candidate spews bs.
you need to break it down and address each element.
then you get candidate to address your reply.
irl theres no time for indepth on anything.
Posted on 8/21/23 at 8:11 am to BugAC
Debates are shows for political junkies. Who's gonna make a gaffe? Who's gonna get caught cheating? Who's gonna look good or bad on camera? It's all a show. We have a vegetable in the White House. That's all you need to know about the value of debates.
Posted on 8/21/23 at 8:16 am to BugAC
Loaded question, not deserving of an honest response.
Re debates...there should be no Moderator, and no censorship at all. None of that 'fact checker' bs. And it should be done just like the NCAA Championship series. Lower ranked teams fight it out and move up to get a shot at the top candidate.
Re debates...there should be no Moderator, and no censorship at all. None of that 'fact checker' bs. And it should be done just like the NCAA Championship series. Lower ranked teams fight it out and move up to get a shot at the top candidate.
Posted on 8/21/23 at 8:21 am to BugAC
quote:
A) Don’t need them anymore
They are traps. Primary candidates should never debate in a primary race, when they will be challenging an incumbent in the main election. Podcasts are the future of politicians getting their message out.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News