- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So is "controlling women's bodies" the preferred term over "killing innocent babies"?
Posted on 5/30/19 at 1:10 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 5/30/19 at 1:10 am to AggieHank86
quote:sigh.
what are the elements of this purported test? Number them.
1. size
2. level of development
3. environment
4. degree of dependency
quote:sigh. it only takes one mr. technicality. and you are failing. you haven't even addressed the point. go figure. in fact, you've argued that you shouldn't even have to bother acknowledging it because you're a closet nazi.
the "sled test" will not be applicable to my analysis, given that three of the four "elements" of the S.L.E.D. mnemonic are completely absent from that analysis.
quote:wow. no, it fails because you are justifying murder merely because the baby differs in level of development from other humans. that is NOT a valid reason to kill someone. that opens the slippery slope for all sorts of murder and you have failed to acknowledge the slippery slope but insist on telling me i need to debunk the sled test myself or that you shouldn't have to bother with it or what is it again?
does it "fail" the test because it IS an analysis that is based largely upon the developmental level of the fetus? If the latter, your position simply categorizes my argument. It does NOT apply any objective test to that argument.
quote:if you can't tell that your position has been challenged, i can't help you. i refuted your brain activity assertion, your species comparison, your rights assertions, everything. otoh, i have asked you to substantiate your positions and you haven't. all you have done is to repeat them when faced with resistance or misuse terms you just googled.
Dude, you have not "refuted" anything.
quote:give me one example. name one question i have failed to answer. quote it.
You dance around, and you dodge questions.
quote:he says after he ran away from the challenge thread.
This post gives you a chance to man-up and remedy all of that.
quote:my word i have already refuted this statement but you keep wasting everyone's time. those are PRIVILEGES, not RIGHTS. they are CONTINGENT upon the right to LIVE. you are talking about something that is downstream.
My 9-year-old daughter is clearly a person, and she is denied the right to vote. My cousin is 28 years old and is denied the right to run for President for the next seven years.
quote:not the right to live. and that right does not get conferred because of a certain level of development. it is inherent at the moment of conception. if you disagree, prove it. prove that there is a time when a baby does not deserve the liberty of life. brain activity, heartbeat, mother's convenience, level of development all don't work. you've already tried them and they all failed.
Different rights vest at different developmental points
Posted on 5/30/19 at 2:30 am to stout
Another term for it is LSU vs Bama no longer on prime time TV. Great job guys. Y’all taught the liberal media a lesson
Popular
Back to top

0




