- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Two questions for pro-choice posters
Posted on 11/30/18 at 11:17 am to Joshjrn
Posted on 11/30/18 at 11:17 am to Joshjrn
Well yeah it’s part of it, but it should never be the focal point. It’s like those dumbasses who will have their point absolutely destroyed by a response, only to have the idiot completely ignore the entire point of the post because of some misspelled word due to autocorrect. It’s childish.
0
Posted on 11/30/18 at 11:32 am to oogabooga68
quote:
Do you believe in Eugenics?
I don't think the government should be involved in controlled breeding
Posted on 11/30/18 at 11:47 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Again. Retarded
To a retard everything looks retarded.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 11:50 am to oogabooga68
quote:
Agreed, anyone who makes the comparison between a blade of grass and a fetal human to make ANY kind of point is unbearably stupid.
So, the OP? Not a blade of grass, granted, but theoretical single celled organisms on Mars.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 11:55 am to WildManGoose
quote:
His premise is that pro-choice viewpoints discount a human fetus as "life". Because if it is "life", then what kind of life could it be if not "human" life?
What about a human sperm cell. Its alive just like the single celled Mars organism. What kind of life is it? Gotta be human right?
quote:
This is too subjective. What is ability to live? To simply breathe? What is the difference in viability between fetal development stages? And what is the difference between a fetus and a baby carried to term and delivered? That delivered baby still is not viable without years of capable oversight. An infant left in an alley will die.
Theres a decent point your missing. Viability changes with technology and with access to technology. Go back 300 years and viability is a lot different than it is today. Or go to Africa today and it's a lot different. If this is a moral issue technology should play no role in determining when the status "human being" is given.
This post was edited on 11/30/18 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 11/30/18 at 12:16 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
1. If NASA announced today that they’d discovered live bacteria on Mars, would you consider that this proves there is life on Mars?
2. If you answered yes to question 1, please explain to me that how a single cell bacteria on Mars is considered to be a life while an unborn fetus (which is very much multi-cell and even has a heart beat) on Earth is not also alive.
I’ll wait.
It's clear that you don't understand the pro-choice argument, do some reading and come back when you're more learned.
We'll wait.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 12:44 pm to Darth_Vader
1. Yes
2. I am pro abortion for different reasons. I am well aware of what abortion really is. Unlike pro abortion progs, I don't live in an alternate reality where I've convinced myself a human life isn't destroyed.
2. I am pro abortion for different reasons. I am well aware of what abortion really is. Unlike pro abortion progs, I don't live in an alternate reality where I've convinced myself a human life isn't destroyed.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 12:48 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Darth_Vader
You're "pro-life" but you actively advocate for conditions which will increase the number of abortions.
You're so fricked in the head.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 1:09 pm to Azkiger
quote:
What about a human sperm cell. Its alive just like the single celled Mars organism. What kind of life is it? Gotta be human right?
A sperm cell is not human life.
quote:
Theres a decent point your missing. Viability changes with technology and with access to technology. Go back 300 years and viability is a lot different than it is today. Or go to Africa today and it's a lot different. If this is a moral issue technology should play no role in determining when the status "human being" is given.
I didn't bring viability up in the conversation. Someone else used it to define the demarcation of acceptable abortion. I simply mentioned that that was too subjective, the same as you just did.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 1:10 pm to VoxDawg
quote:frick off...if you want a protected bubble then go back to the Q thread
You and about a dozen other lib posters on here make me sad that downvotes don't count for anything on this site.
Seriously, every hundred you notch should autoban you for at least 24H
Posted on 11/30/18 at 2:25 pm to Darth_Vader
Seven pages, and still looking for the first abortion rights supporter who says that a fetus is not alive.
OP, are you feeling stupid yet? Or are you so accustomed to the feeling that you no longer notice?
OP, are you feeling stupid yet? Or are you so accustomed to the feeling that you no longer notice?
Posted on 11/30/18 at 2:32 pm to Darth_Vader
Your question has nothing to do with why people are pro-choice.
Whether or not abortion is right and whether or not government is to intervene between the actor and the act are two different things.
Whether or not abortion is right and whether or not government is to intervene between the actor and the act are two different things.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 2:34 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Because moral superiority is heroin.
Why do abortion opponents repeatedly ask the same stupid-arsed questions, which intentionally attempt to misrepresent the views of abortion rights supporters regarding the status of a zygote/blastocyst/embryo/fetus?
Posted on 11/30/18 at 2:35 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Equating a human fetus and a bacterium is the central premise of the OP. Refuting that (moronic) premise is hardly a “straw man.”
I think that he was saying there is zero concern for the "life" of the fetus pertaining to abortion from a leftist's point of view.
Many abortion advocates probably view the "life" of the fetus as important as a blade of grass. Not sure who came up with that blade of grass thought.
Not that hard to figure out.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 2:37 pm to Kentucker
quote:
The relevant term regarding abortion isn’t life. It’s viability, the ability to live outside the womb.
So we can terminate premies? They ain't exactly viable.
We've been down this road before too.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 2:38 pm to Darth_Vader
What about all the trees you killed just to write this post. That’s living breathing life!
Posted on 11/30/18 at 2:40 pm to Tigerrush7
quote:
Yogurt has live bacteria, do you believe that yogurt is equal to human life? According to the dumbass OP, we should start giving yogurt SSN....
WTF are you talking about? We have a guy who thinks he can debate political and social issues in our office like you.
We make fun of him daily.
Posted on 11/30/18 at 2:41 pm to bmy
quote:
I don't think the government should be involved in controlled breeding
Govt controls every other aspect of our life. Why not this one?
Why can't I marry 3 women?
Posted on 11/30/18 at 2:49 pm to i am dan
quote:
Govt controls every other aspect of our life. Why not this one?
Why can't I marry 3 women?
You should be able to
Posted on 11/30/18 at 3:13 pm to tiger7166
Because it's her body!
She should of thought about that before she opened her legs! I just wanted to feel good and now my life is over! Let the baby live and be adopted by someone that can't have kids, but desperately wants one.
*Yes, we know rape is a touchy subject in regards to that issue, but it's still someone's life!
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News