- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Warren invested in private prisons
Posted on 9/27/19 at 10:42 am to PorkSammich
Posted on 9/27/19 at 10:42 am to PorkSammich
For everyone that hates Nike, Starbucks, Proctor and Gamble, and whatever large company you hate today, if you own an S&P 500 Index Fund, you have stock in that company. Faulting Warren for that is ridiculous.
0
Posted on 9/27/19 at 10:54 am to PorkSammich
oh you got her now. It likely isn't in the top 10 holdings of her target date fund which is usually all you will ever see within the fund unless you request extra details.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 10:55 am to PorkSammich
Didnt the media pull the same shite with Romney back in the day?
Posted on 9/27/19 at 11:02 am to ShortyRob
quote:What about the reach that everyone on the left is in favor of open borders?
Actually, make better notes.
I think this type of reach is stupid and, frankly, not beneficial.
It's ok to be a hypocrite sometimes. Every parent at some point has told their children "do as I say, not as I do". Nearly everyone on this board is in favor of "fighting fire with fire". There are constant complaints about the "violent liberals", and nearly as constant calls for civil war.
All of that is hypocritical. I just ask that we be honest about it.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 11:18 am to Korkstand
quote:
What about the reach that everyone on the left is in favor of open borders?
All of your candidates are.
Nice try
quote:Most people define the word hypocrite horribly.
It's ok to be a hypocrite sometimes. Every parent at some point has told their children "do as I say, not as I do"
If a parent is CURRENTLY doing something and tells his kids not to, THAT is hypocrisy. If they USED TO do shite 10 years ago that they've figured out was stupid and tell their kids not to, THAT is NOT hypocrisy.
Hypocrisy, quite obviously, has a time component or literally no one could EVER change their minds on anything in life.
quote:When one party cheers IN ALL frickING VENUES that they were successful shutting down a campaign thru violent intimidation........it is NOT hypocritical to say, "we might have to kill these frickers".
There are constant complaints about the "violent liberals", and nearly as constant calls for civil war.
Sorry. It just ain't.
You fricking lefties are basically arguing that if you punch someone in the face, and that person gets up and punches you back, anyone supporting the return fire is a "hypocrite".
Nope
Posted on 9/27/19 at 11:21 am to Korkstand
quote:
As far as the amount of stretch from reality
So you will admit that the two are indirectly related? Correct.
Um do you see anything going on in current events that might be considered parallel hysteria?
Posted on 9/27/19 at 11:36 am to ShortyRob
quote:This is a very clear misrepresentation of reality. You are defining "open borders" however you please. This is your own hypocrisy in action.
All of your candidates are.
Nice try
quote:The example I used usually comes up when the kid actually witnesses the parent doing the hypocritical thing, but whatever.
Most people define the word hypocrite horribly.
If a parent is CURRENTLY doing something and tells his kids not to, THAT is hypocrisy. If they USED TO do shite 10 years ago that they've figured out was stupid and tell their kids not to, THAT is NOT hypocrisy.
quote:WTfrick are you talking about?
When one party cheers IN ALL frickING VENUES that they were successful shutting down a campaign thru violent intimidation....
quote:Denouncing whatever violence you're talking about, then claiming fricking murder is an appropriate way to respond, is absolutely 100% hypocritical.
it is NOT hypocritical to say, "we might have to kill these frickers".
quote:Dude, the "punch in the face" you're referencing is, as far as I can tell, probably a literal punch in the face by some fringe loons. To respond to that with calls for civil fricking war, while claiming to abhor violence, is most certainly hypocritical.
You fricking lefties are basically arguing that if you punch someone in the face, and that person gets up and punches you back, anyone supporting the return fire is a "hypocrite".
Nope
But just continue redefining terms to fit your beliefs.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 11:42 am to Korkstand
quote:False
This is a very clear misrepresentation of reality. You are defining "open borders" however you please. This is your own hypocrisy in action.
quote:Well then, that's definitely hypocritical.
The example I used usually comes up when the kid actually witnesses the parent doing the hypocritical thing, but whatever.
quote:EVERY major media outlet and EVERY prominent democrat partied like it was Mardi Gras when they "successfully" caused a Trump campaign event in Chicago to have to be cancelled due to the threat of violence. EVERY LAST ONE. Hell, this board exploded with liberal glee too. That's who your party is.
WTfrick are you talking about?
quote:Your party supports those "fringe loons".
Dude, the "punch in the face" you're referencing is, as far as I can tell, probably a literal punch in the face by some fringe loons.
Hell, your media sycophants have been running interference for them.
Hell, your party is ENCOURAGING it
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:03 pm to ShortyRob
quote:You could at least try to defend your claims. "Open borders" has a very clear definition, and you are NOT using it in that way.
False
quote:Another misrepresentation of reality. There was no legitimate threat of violence. There were just a lot of protesters, and Trump didn't want to deal with it. I don't blame him for that. But claiming it was because of a threat of violence is just dishonest. As it turns out, scuffles only broke out AFTER the rally was canceled. Who do you think was mad at that point?
EVERY major media outlet and EVERY prominent democrat partied like it was Mardi Gras when they "successfully" caused a Trump campaign event in Chicago to have to be cancelled due to the threat of violence. EVERY LAST ONE. Hell, this board exploded with liberal glee too. That's who your party is.
quote:
Your party supports those "fringe loons".
Hell, your media sycophants have been running interference for them.
Hell, your party is ENCOURAGING it
False.
(See, I can do that too)
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:08 pm to Korkstand
quote:Why would I rehash a discussion we had for multiple posts literally a few days ago. Maybe not even that long?
You could at least try to defend your claims
quote:My God. This is so brazenly dishonest, it's almost texridder class.
Another misrepresentation of reality. There was no legitimate threat of violence. There were just a lot of protesters, and Trump didn't want to deal with it.
quote:Except there are multiple videos of actual Dem politicians ENCOURAGING harassment of political opponents as well as multiple videos of them and the press actually trying to say ANTIFA isn't that bad.
False.
(See, I can do that too)
So. You can say "false". But, the videos don't lie
This post was edited on 9/27/19 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:14 pm to Korkstand
Yet I am 100% positive if OMB were in this situation you would be calling for more peach mint 
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:20 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Because you still refuse to apply the correct definition to terms. Whatever makes you feel better.
Why would I rehash a discussion we had for multiple posts literally a few days ago. Maybe not even that long?
quote:
My God. This is so brazenly dishonest, it's almost texridder class.
And you think the real reason it was canceled is because Trump didn't want anyone to get hurt? Hilarious. He makes violent suggestions all the time, talking about "handling" people and such.
The fact remains that there were NO scuffles until AFTER the rally was canceled. I ask again, who was mad at that point?
quote:I've seen people encouraging protests (it is a very American pastime), but absolutely ZERO politicians or legit media members encouraging violence. On that topic, though, are you going to claim that Trump himself hasn't encouraged violence?
Except there are multiple videos of actual Dem politicians ENCOURAGING harassment of political opponents as well as multiple videos of them and the press actually trying to say ANTIFA isn't that bad.
quote:I'm going to need a link to videos of people encouraging violence.
So. You can say "false". But, the videos don't lie
You, though, are arguing "false" to the damned dictionary.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:22 pm to PorkSammich
And Based Tulsi qualified for the next debate.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:25 pm to Korkstand
quote:
What a fricking reach.
For all the complaining about how "the media" misrepresents things that your boy does, you guys are pretty good at that shite in your own right.
frick you
The point is everybody invests in everything.
Your bitch is a money grubbing whore who will invest in anything to make a buck.
There are holier than thou "conscience" funds. Why the frick isn't she solely in them?
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:27 pm to PorkSammich
So, Warren invested in a fund that invested in a fund that held some stock in its broader portfolio in a company that runs private prisons.
OK
OK
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:28 pm to Korkstand
quote:
violent suggestions all the time
Why must you progs lie?
Posted on 9/27/19 at 5:08 pm to roadGator
quote:
Why must you progs lie?
It's in their DNA
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News