- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: YouTube took down that 27 minute video
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:36 pm to ole man
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:36 pm to ole man
quote:
Your a idiot. I love people Ike you because y’all always show your ignorance when you talk. If you believe that short frick spewing all his shite is not on the take your an idiot. I believe every frickin thing she said
If you call someone an idiot, do it correctly. Let me help you.
quote:
You’re an idiot. I love people Ike you because y’all always show your ignorance when you talk. If you believe that short frick spewing all his shite is not on the take you’re an idiot. I believe every frickin thing she said
You want to believe someone who’s discredited and disgraced, go ahead.
1
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:38 pm to Revelator
quote:
I heard the entire video before thank you. In what context should vaccines ever be mentioned in regards to population control?
Did you read my post at all?
Vaccine make less sick. Less sick make less die. Less die make mama and dada wanna make less baby. Population don't go big up.
Did you understand that?
Edit: Nice edit, lol, good thing I quoted you. I guess you actually read my post. So you watched the whole video before, but you weren't listening to it.
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 7:40 pm
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:41 pm to Microtiger
quote:
Did you understand that?
You do know that Bill Gates is proudly into eugenics and his father headed Planned Parenthood at one time right.
Just coincidences I guess?
If you take Gates history into context and listen to the things he says, it doesn’t take a genius to understand his end goals.
LINK
quote:
In a lengthy interview with Bill Moyers released today, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates reveals the inspiration for his funding of pro-abortion population control measures. Responding to a question by Moyers on how he came to fund “reproductive issues” Gates answered, “When I was growing up, my parents were always involved in various volunteer things. My dad was head of Planned Parenthood. And it was very controversial to be involved with that. And so it’s fascinating. At the dinner table my parents are very good at sharing the things that they were doing. And almost treating us like adults, talking about that.” In the interview Gates says he is moved by measurable progress and on “safe birth reproductive family planning issues” he says.
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:52 pm to Revelator
quote:
You do know that Bill Gates is proudly into eugenics and his father headed Planned Parenthood at one time right. Just coincidences I guess? If you take Gates history into context and listen to the things he says, it doesn’t take a genius to understand his end goals.
So Planned Parenthood equals...third world genocide, eugenics, and population control? There is also no credible non-conspiracy link for Gates to eugenics.
The closest link for Planned Parenthood is Margaret Sanger and eugenics, but to pretend that makes the organization today a eugenics organization is absurd. Eugenics was an (unfortunately) widely accepted idea at the time.
If you weren't already biased, you would read the Snopes page on this with an open mind, and instead of immediately replying with "lol Snopes is a liberal fake site" you would actually read into each of the source they cite in the article. But conspiracy theories are contagious and you will refuse evidence against it no matter how plainly it's laid out or told to you, and you'll only do "research" that confirms your views of what is real.
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:53 pm to Microtiger
quote:
you would read the Snopes page
My mistake. I thought I was talking to someone who was serious!
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:54 pm to Revelator
quote:
My mistake. I thought I was talking to someone who was serious!
I didn't edit it in time, but right after I posted I added "If you weren't already biased, you would read the Snopes page on this with an open mind, and instead of immediately replying with "lol Snopes is a liberal fake site" you would actually read into each of the source they cite in the article."
But you did exactly what I expected. Immediately.
Instead of looking into anything at all, you reacted emotionally and defensively, because for you, this incorrect position has become part of your identity and something you take personally.
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 5/6/20 at 7:57 pm to Microtiger
You probably think that Snopes is dedicated to revealing the truth and Planned Parenthood is about a woman’s health!
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 7:59 pm
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:01 pm to Revelator
quote:
You probably think that Snopes is dedicated to revealing the truth and Planned Parenthood is about woman’s health!
Snopes debunks "liberal" conspiracies, sides with conservatives, and sides against liberals all the time. You, and others, reach the opinion that it's a liberal website with an agenda because you repeatedly get sent links from it that argue reality against your conspiracy theories. So of course it seems like the website only disagrees with your bad, uninformed opinions. Do you want to know something funny? Liberals complain about Snopes, too. For the same, but opposite, reason.
I will agree that Planned Parenthood being about women's health is a joke and a deflection tbh - abortion is clearly a big part of their thing.
I predict that next you're going to say "show me one article Snopes debunked that was a liberal conspiracy!" because of course the goalposts will never stop changing. When I link them, you'll say "those don't count because X, they only posted those to make it look like they're balanced!"
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:08 pm to Microtiger
quote:
You, and others, reach the opinion that it's a liberal website with an agenda because you repeatedly get sent links from it that argue reality against your conspiracy theories.
I think Snopes is liberal because they are. This is a pointless argument. It would be like you telling me the MSM has no liberal biases.
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:09 pm to RuLSU
quote:
discredited and disgraced
Isn't that the first thing The powers that be do to people who leave the plantation ? They own the media , they can put whatever the frick they want to discredit anyone at anytime . I figured after what bs fake news weve witnessed in the last 3 years you fricks would get this by now . Guess not . Kavanaugh? Hello! General Flynn ? Hello! Popa D ? Hello ! Your mutha frickin president DJT . Hello? She literally tells you in the video its happened to her . Cant believe you people are here defending Faushitzi. That Jersey Fuc has been wrong about everything hes said . Doctors around the country calling bullshite on him . His ties to deep state fuks like Bill Gates. Software guru turned vaccine expert . Like Greta Thurnberg is a climate change expert .Right ? George frickin Soros? Nah , thats no big deal . Really ? Shes calling bs on him but muh she been discredited ? Critical thinking is lacking in our society .
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 8:39 pm
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:17 pm to Revelator
quote:Well that’s just patently untrue.
I have no idea what percentage of vaccines are contaminated and neither do you
If you had said neither of us have perfect understanding of the number of vaccines that are contaminated, then yea, you’d have a point. But to say we have NO idea is just flat out dumb. We have an EXTREMELY good idea that of the some 300,000,000 vaccines administered in the US each year, significantly fewer than 30% are contaminated.
Do I know that with absolute, 100% certainty? Of course not. Do I have a pretty damn good idea? Yea. fricking duh.
quote:And she came up with that number by studying samples and finding contamination in 30% of them. That contamination was self inflicted, indicating that the true number of contamination’s was obviously below 30%. Again, fricking duh.
I have no idea where she came up with that number
quote:No, it’s not a stretch to say that some scientists are on the take. Yes, it is a stretch to say that all scientists are on the take. And the fact that not a single scientist could replicate this woman’s results is nearly irrefutable evidence that her conclusion was just simply wrong.
but it’s not a stretch to assert that pharmaceutical companies are in the business to make money, and some scientists and doctors are on the take.
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:25 pm to DreauxB2015
Sometimes higher powers discredit threats. Sometimes shitheads discredit themselves. That so many people seem fundamentally unable to acknowledge that both realities exist simultaneously is astonishing.
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:31 pm to Revelator
quote:
I think Snopes is liberal because they are.
Damn you got me, that's a perfectly assembled line of evidence. I'm stumped!
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:36 pm to funnystuff
what makes her a discredited shithead ? A now discredited media ? Seems logical ? Unless you personal know her or can present evidence other than a media article from the now discredited media . Just stfu already . I tend to believe her rather than a Jersey deep state schmuck that's been wrong about everything and slaps dick with the likes of George Soros and Bill Gates . No way those guys are in for the money . Right? Whats she in it for anyways ? WTF does she have to gain by doing this ? Death ? 
This post was edited on 5/6/20 at 8:51 pm
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:51 pm to DreauxB2015
She was discredited when the entirety of the scientific community, including her own lab, were unable to replicate the results of the biggest study of her career where she claimed that 30% of vaccines were contaminated with retrovirus. It turns out, that contamination came from her. But she still pushes the 30% number to try to make a name for herself and uses the entire ordeal to feign victimhood.
She’s not a scientist that tries to be taken seriously any longer. She just tries to get famous sell books (the latest of which was just released 3 weeks ago; shocking timing I know InsertEyeRoll)
She’s not a scientist that tries to be taken seriously any longer. She just tries to get famous sell books (the latest of which was just released 3 weeks ago; shocking timing I know InsertEyeRoll)
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:52 pm to Microtiger
quote:
I'm stumped!
To put it mildly
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:54 pm to funnystuff
quote:
But she still pushes the 30% number to try to make a name for herself and uses the entire ordeal to feign victimhood.
Almost how the MSM and the fake scientists are pushing false Covid death numbers to suit their agenda, huh?
Posted on 5/6/20 at 8:55 pm to MileHighDraw
Posted on 5/6/20 at 9:03 pm to funnystuff
quote:
entirety of the scientific community,
How did you learn of this ? Media ? .How are people treated who come out against vaccines today. Do you think they would be treated fairly if they found something wrong with vaccines knowing what you know today ? Did that "Scientific Commuity" included the guy , you know . Thats been wrong about everything hes said so far about Covid-19? Probably her boss at the time right? Think fricker , what does she have to gain right now to come out against Faushitzi? Is death on her bucket list?
Posted on 5/6/20 at 9:03 pm to Revelator
Deflect, shift, avoid, and dismiss and then do it all over again. Tried and true playbook for avoiding any need to ever engage with a conflicting position. Well done.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News