- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/6/17 at 10:46 pm to Srbtiger06
quote:
Just a massive series of "BUT BUT BUT!!!"
Thats all DS and McBro have to say when faced with facts
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:53 pm to StraightCashHomey21
I mean, it's obvious SCH ain't gonna back down.
This is the guy who is so committed to loving all things British that he thinks grime is good. He's got an iron will.
This is the guy who is so committed to loving all things British that he thinks grime is good. He's got an iron will.
This post was edited on 9/6/17 at 11:53 pm
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:54 pm to WarSlamEagle
quote:
I mean, it's obvious SCH ain't gonna back down.
This is the guy who is so committed to loving all things British that he thinks grime is good. He's got an iron will.
When did FFP become a british thing? Probably would find more support for it in Germany.
I never said grime is good, Stormzy is good a bunch of the rest is meh.
I expect better from you WSE if your going to come at me like that.
Posted on 9/7/17 at 12:05 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
When did FFP become a british thing? Probably would find more support for it in Germany.
It isn't. I didn't mean to insinuate that it was.
quote:
I never said grime is good, Stormzy is good a bunch of the rest is meh.
I was using you liking grime (which is so, so bad) as our resident British bruv to show you've gotta stay on brand. And being hardcore committed to your opinions on here is definitely part of that brand. You're not gonna go quietly into the night on this debate.
And I vaguely remember you posting something about how we needed to get on grime some time ago. You might've just mentioned Stormzy. It's all bad to me. I don't care enough to look the post up. Life is meaningless. Eat at Arby's.
quote:
I expect better from you WSE if your going to come at me like that.
Dude, it's not that serious.
And I've been hella busy. International break got me off my game.
This post was edited on 9/7/17 at 12:08 am
Posted on 9/7/17 at 7:43 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Thats all DS and McBro have to say when faced with facts
the issue is more that you seem to think your point of view is the only legitimate one.
Posted on 9/7/17 at 7:44 am to TN Bhoy
quote:
I'd just like to point out the hilarity of the disconnect between DS's posts in this thread (and other QSG threads) and his poli-board posts.
Not really, I'm the contrarian on both boards.
Posted on 9/7/17 at 8:04 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
the issue is more that you seem to think your point of view is the only legitimate one.
Well yours is basically a conspiracy theory
So it's hard to take your serious
Posted on 9/7/17 at 8:16 am to WarSlamEagle
The bruv shtick will never die
Posted on 9/7/17 at 8:20 am to StraightCashHomey21
even outside of the reasons why FFP was created a person can still disagree with the concept and mentality.
Posted on 9/7/17 at 8:32 am to Draconian Sanctions
But it's clear you feel that way bc it was put in place so clubs like yours doesn't spend way beyond its means.
It was a regulation put in place that was needed and the actions of PSG influenced that no one will deny that.
But it's not a conspiracy, it's there to make sure clubs conduct themselves like clubs. Not play things in a dick measuring contest bw Qatar and UAE.
It was a regulation put in place that was needed and the actions of PSG influenced that no one will deny that.
But it's not a conspiracy, it's there to make sure clubs conduct themselves like clubs. Not play things in a dick measuring contest bw Qatar and UAE.
This post was edited on 9/7/17 at 8:33 am
Posted on 9/7/17 at 9:00 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
But it's clear you feel that way bc it was put in place so clubs like yours doesn't spend way beyond its means.
that's part of it but I also:
quote:
it's there to make sure clubs conduct themselves like clubs.
just flat out don't agree with the traditional view of what a club is "supposed" to be run as to be relevant in 2017. Especially when the fee is paid in full in a lump sum like Neymar's was.
Nor do i think more money coming into the sport is automatically a bad thing.
This post was edited on 9/7/17 at 9:04 am
Posted on 9/7/17 at 9:01 am to StraightCashHomey21
And even if you don't want to go as far as I am in regards to the why FFP was brought in do you really believe that as it was making the rounds the big clubs didn't see it as an opportunity to prevent more Chelseas? And that maybe that influenced how the legislation was developed? Even a little bit?
This post was edited on 9/7/17 at 9:03 am
Posted on 9/7/17 at 9:20 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
just flat out don't agree with the traditional view of what a club is "supposed" to be run as to be relevant in 2017. Especially when the fee is paid in full in a lump sum like Neymar's was. Nor do i think more money coming into the sport is automatically a bad thing
Well the problem is this goes way beyond a traditional view of a club. Nation states with endless resources taking their personal fight to the football world is an issue.
Posted on 9/7/17 at 9:24 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Well the problem is this goes way beyond a traditional view of a club. Nation states with endless resources taking their personal fight to the football world is an issue.
again i just disagree that either of those statements are a problem.
#1 the "traditional view" of a club has been pretty radically changed over the last 25-30 years and goes way way way way way beyond what PSG are doing. if you want to be against modern football that's completely fine but you seem to be hyperfocused on 1 or 2 clubs when in reality it's a dramatically bigger thing than that.
#2 Again I just don't agree that a lot of outside money coming into the sport is automatically a bad thing.
Posted on 9/7/17 at 2:58 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Nation states with endless resources taking their personal fight to the football world is an issue.
What have any of these nation states done that Abromavich, Kroenke/Usmanov, Mittal, Mateschitz, Ortega, or any multi-billionaire couldn't do if they wanted to?
Posted on 9/7/17 at 3:27 pm to theOG
quote:
What have any of these nation states done that Abromavich, Kroenke/Usmanov, Mittal, Mateschitz, Ortega, or any multi-billionaire couldn't do if they wanted to?
not a thing and regardless of what you think about it, QIA did create commercial sponsorship contracts for the club, which is more than just opening up the pocket book when needed. Believe it or not, PSG does have a budget.
This post was edited on 9/7/17 at 4:12 pm
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News